911 1964- to current Porsche 911, from the air-cooled days to the current 997

1985-86 3.2 Carrera vs. 89 3.2 Targa

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-09-2008, 05:05 PM
asifallasleep's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: new york
Posts: 110
Rep Power: 22
asifallasleep is infamous around these parts
1985-86 3.2 Carrera vs. 89 3.2 Targa

hi guys, does the G50 transmission make that much of a difference. I've had an 83' 944, 2000 Boxster and 03' 996 (horrible car, littany of issues and 7K in repairs in 7 months after ownership and then gearbox/synchro issues). Looking at the 3.2's because the BMW's i've driven since i got rid of my 996 just don't cut it. Test drove a real nice 85 3.2 today and am now looking at an 89 3.2 later this week for 4k more. Any opinions. I don't like the look of the 964's at all.
 
  #2  
Old 11-11-2008, 02:38 PM
rickster's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 0
rickster is infamous around these parts
Not that big a difference for me...cable clutch vs hydraulic....this 915 gearbox is decent. I have an 86 and love it...great car and it makes what porsche is building now..look like total crap as far as build quality. I think nothing compares to the classic lines of this era of Porsche
 
  #3  
Old 11-14-2008, 10:18 PM
racerbvd's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Down the street from Hooters in Sunny FL.
Age: 59
Posts: 2,269
Rep Power: 141
racerbvd has a reputation beyond reputeracerbvd has a reputation beyond reputeracerbvd has a reputation beyond reputeracerbvd has a reputation beyond reputeracerbvd has a reputation beyond reputeracerbvd has a reputation beyond reputeracerbvd has a reputation beyond reputeracerbvd has a reputation beyond reputeracerbvd has a reputation beyond reputeracerbvd has a reputation beyond reputeracerbvd has a reputation beyond repute
Well, I have a 71 track car (restoration) 78SC,83SC cab & a 88 Targa, the G50 does make a difference, and $4K isn't really out of line.
 
  #4  
Old 11-17-2008, 08:03 PM
Pipes's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxford, Maryland
Age: 83
Posts: 286
Rep Power: 29
Pipes is infamous around these parts
The G50 tranny is superior to the 915....I have 220K miles on my G50 in my 87 Carrerra and it's never given me a problem...the case of the transmission has never been opened. I've had problems with the hydraulic clutch on a couple of occasions, but then it needed to be serviced given the miles I put on it.
 
  #5  
Old 11-17-2008, 10:25 PM
heeltoe914's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: La cresenta
Posts: 159
Rep Power: 25
heeltoe914 has a spectacular aura aboutheeltoe914 has a spectacular aura aboutheeltoe914 has a spectacular aura about
Originally Posted by rickster
Not that big a difference for me...cable clutch vs hydraulic....this 915 gearbox is decent. I have an 86 and love it...great car and it makes what porsche is building now..look like total crap as far as build quality. I think nothing compares to the classic lines of this era of Porsche

+1 on what he said I have had mine for 10 years shift great and no problems 86 widebody For sale
 
Attached Images  
  #6  
Old 11-18-2008, 01:28 PM
Vintage Racer's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 17 Year member in GA
Posts: 301
Rep Power: 31
Vintage Racer is infamous around these partsVintage Racer is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by heeltoe914
widebody For sale
Link?
 
  #7  
Old 11-18-2008, 09:44 PM
speedwerks's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 21
speedwerks is infamous around these partsspeedwerks is infamous around these parts
Big difference between the G50 and the 915. All new synchronizer technology, built for a lot more power (higher safety margin), and a 15-year leap in technology and design. The 89 also has a better motor (compare HP ratings) and a better HVAC system ('86+).
 
  #8  
Old 11-25-2008, 09:54 PM
cibergypsy's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 578
Rep Power: 42
cibergypsy is a jewel in the roughcibergypsy is a jewel in the roughcibergypsy is a jewel in the rough
Definitely go for a G50 equipped 911 3.2. I've had a 1984 Targa, a 1985 Coupé and now a 1987 Coupé. The G50 makes a HUGE difference and don't doubt that! Just drive both a 915 and a G50 car and you'll know. Also, 1986 and newer cars have a better A/C system (not that it cools any better) that has much bigger vents on the dashboard. If you can spare the cash, get the Griffiths system with 2 condensers on the rear left wheel well and you'll have an A/C as cold as the new 997s. I can tell you that from experience, as I have both a 2006 Carrera S Coupé and the 1987 3.2 Carrera with the Griffiths AC. By the way, while it is true that a G50 car has about 10 hp more than a 915 car, the G50 car is little heavier due to the transmission amongst other details but the performance of both in a straight line is identical. I have taken both the 1985 Coupé and the 1987 Coupé on a straight line from a rolling start to a speed that is fast enough and both were head to head all the way.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cdrik915
New Member Introductions
6
05-14-2019 11:15 AM
twlai
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
3
10-05-2015 08:02 AM
ricks234
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
0
09-10-2015 12:51 PM
AJUSA.com
991 Vendor Classifieds
0
09-09-2015 12:47 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 1985-86 3.2 Carrera vs. 89 3.2 Targa



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:21 AM.