991

991 to last 14 years?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #46  
Old 10-04-2011 | 01:27 PM
Rodsky's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 276
From: Los Angeles
Rep Power: 32
Rodsky is just really niceRodsky is just really niceRodsky is just really niceRodsky is just really nice
Originally Posted by Zlaatan


So you wouldn't buy it because other cars, who might end up being slower than the Porsche, has more hp?..

But why is it better if:
(1) the 991 weighs the same or more than the 997, has the same driveline and 50-60hp more

vs

(2) it being 200lb lighter and having some trick suspension, gearbox etc and having the same amount of hp?

My view is that Nr2 is better in every way, except in the pub when you're talking to your mates. Or when you discuss hp on the internet...
I guess you disagree.

Would you not buy the 991TT over some other car if the TT ends up having 40hp less than said car and is .3 sec slower to 60mph?
How often do you do standing starts at the red light, and is .3 sec that important when you do that?
Is the number next to the HP column in the manual more important to you than looks, heritage, handling, sound, comfort, real world performance etc etc etc etc???

..
Very good point. I have a 385HP Porsche that performs better than many cars with 500HP. It does 0-60 in 4.1 seconds (thanks PDK), goes around corners great, handles beutifully etc. I dont mind that someone in an M5 or M6 has 500HP or that an M3 has 414HP or a C63 has 450HP or the ISF has 420HP (or whatever it has). I know my car is a better performer. It can hold its own off the line and when we have to turn, goodbye.
 
  #47  
Old 10-04-2011 | 08:47 PM
jaspergtr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,220
From: Fayetteville
Rep Power: 497
jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Rodsky
Very good point. I have a 385HP Porsche that performs better than many cars with 500HP. It does 0-60 in 4.1 seconds (thanks PDK), goes around corners great, handles beutifully etc. I dont mind that someone in an M5 or M6 has 500HP or that an M3 has 414HP or a C63 has 450HP or the ISF has 420HP (or whatever it has). I know my car is a better performer. It can hold its own off the line and when we have to turn, goodbye.
Interesting...
 
  #48  
Old 10-05-2011 | 11:14 AM
mikegr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 485
From: greece
Rep Power: 33
mikegr is infamous around these parts
Thats because these cars weight 1800-1900 kg.
Note however that M6 has 205 miles top speed, which means this extra power has an effect...
 
  #49  
Old 10-05-2011 | 04:28 PM
kip's Avatar
kip
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,330
From: Northern Europe
Rep Power: 76
kip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by mikegr
Thats because these cars weight 1800-1900 kg.
Note however that M6 has 205 miles top speed, which means this extra power has an effect...
I think gearing affects that more here than hp...
 
  #50  
Old 10-09-2011 | 11:25 AM
bli8's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 378
From: Monterey Park, CA
Rep Power: 0
bli8 is infamous around these partsbli8 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by uhn2000
Good points, I did not mean any disrespect to you or Nissan - they make great cars. Yes I am alive and still don't see anyone cross shopping a new 911 Turbo and GTR.
I'm one of those that will be cross shopping between the '13 GT-R and 991TTS. After owning a 6GT3 for 4 years and very happy with it and a 997.1 Turbo for 1.5 years and not so happy with the Tip (wife wanted to drive the car so I gave in to get a Tip - big mistake), I'd love to come back to another 911, but the performance of the new GT-R is just too awesome to not cross shop. Not to mention for the price of the new TTS, I could get a GT-R and a Cayenne S.
 
  #51  
Old 10-18-2011 | 11:48 PM
TT Surgeon's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
From: Long Island, NY
Rep Power: 345
TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by tortesq1
Zlaatan,

I will buy a 2013 991TT even if it is not THE fastest car at its pricepoint or if it doesn't have the best power/weight ratio. However, I will not be buying a 2013 991TT if it isn't competitive with all of the cars you mentioned. I can't argue with your point that HP alone does not make a good performer. If I agreed I wouldn't be a TT owner - I'd own a ZR1 or Viper. While #'s never tell the whole story, I think it is absolutely critical that Porsche take the lead in producing a competitive car with Ferrari and Lambo. When the 458 and Gallardo produce 570-580 HP why shouldn't Porsche ? To say that #'s are literally irrelevant seems disingenuous.
When I had my 03 X50 I felt like I ruled the road "box stock" (ie. no mods). With my 07 I lost that feeling a bit vs. the F430. I want that feeling back again. I want the feeling that, even though she is my DD, I rule the road. While I don't expect to beat a Bugatti Veyron, I do expect my steed to hold her own. The mere fact that the GTR is competitive with the 997TT demonstrates my point. I want the next TT to surpass the GTR and all comers - including the 458 and McClaren. Why is it that you can't feel your cars emotion and also be one of the fastest rides out there ?
I thought you were getting a 2012tts?
Why did you change your mind?
I must admit mine has been a great DD, but I do miss the MT. I had it at the track recently and it literally mopped up a 458 , (the viper srt was a different story....) it's a bit boring, but fast as hell.
 
  #52  
Old 10-19-2011 | 07:50 AM
tortesq1's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 295
From: Long Island, New York
Rep Power: 29
tortesq1 has a spectacular aura abouttortesq1 has a spectacular aura about
Chris,

I was under the impression that the 991TT would be out sooner (ie. end of 2012 as a 2013 model) so I decided to give up my build slot on the 2012TTS. However, all indications are that the new 991TT will be out in 2013 as a 2014 model. My lease is up in June, 2012 so I am stuck with either buying my 997.1TT with a $57K plus buyback (it should have about 56K-58K miles on her by then) which is a likely money loser or going without a TT for approx. 1-1 1/2 years until the new 991TT arrives (which is an unacceptable emotional situation for me). I don't think the new 991TT will be any more "exciting" than your TTS. The fact is that our DD's just don't generate the thrill factor of a 458 winding out to 9000RPM, BUT how many Ferrari's do you see every morning in bumper to bumper traffic on the LIE or BQE ? Fuggedaboutit !!! The bottom line is that we need a bullet proof DD and I'm going to have a big decision to make very soon.
 
  #53  
Old 10-19-2011 | 09:22 AM
kip's Avatar
kip
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,330
From: Northern Europe
Rep Power: 76
kip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by tortesq1
Chris,

I was under the impression that the 991TT would be out sooner (ie. end of 2012 as a 2013 model) so I decided to give up my build slot on the 2012TTS. However, all indications are that the new 991TT will be out in 2013 as a 2014 model. My lease is up in June, 2012 so I am stuck with either buying my 997.1TT with a $57K plus buyback (it should have about 56K-58K miles on her by then) which is a likely money loser or going without a TT for approx. 1-1 1/2 years until the new 991TT arrives (which is an unacceptable emotional situation for me). I don't think the new 991TT will be any more "exciting" than your TTS. The fact is that our DD's just don't generate the thrill factor of a 458 winding out to 9000RPM, BUT how many Ferrari's do you see every morning in bumper to bumper traffic on the LIE or BQE ? Fuggedaboutit !!! The bottom line is that we need a bullet proof DD and I'm going to have a big decision to make very soon.
The 458 is slower in a straight line, they are about equally fast on the track, and Ferraris are known to be unreliable. What exactly more do you want from a sportscar than the turbo S offers? Where I live all the Ferrari drivers drive like idiots, allways in 1st gear to show of their 9000 RPMS. Myself I dont envy that. They lack torque, so in the real world they are allways slower and in my opinnion the only thrill they provide more than a POrsche is that your heart pounds if you will make it to work in the morning with a Ferrari or will you be stranded beside the road. The EVO MAGAZINE long termer Ferrari 458 broke down on the highway right after it was bought. To me that tells the whole story and why you dont see them in morning traffic. I like how it looks, but then again I like Aston Martins and Lamborghinis more. As you see I am not a Ferrari fan
 
  #54  
Old 11-07-2011 | 06:22 AM
ice350's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,625
From: fort lauderdale
Rep Power: 105
ice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Zlaatan
I've read the same arguments in the F10 M5 vs AMG/RS6 etc discussions and, I'm sorry to say, I cannot for the life of me understand it. "I won't buy this car if it has X hp less than that car".
If cars only existed on paper, the Nissan GTR would probably be the slowest sportscar in the world considering it's hp and weight. Instead, it kills the lighter, more powerful 458 Italia both in a straight line and around the Ring.

Why is the hp number so important? Isn't the performance numbers what you want to look at? Isn't the way the car makes you feel more important? The way it drives, the way it looks?

I know it is the internet, but the two most talked about topics when it comes to buying and comparing cars seems to be hp and 0-60, 0-100mph numbers..

Does everyone on the internet live on a drag strip?
I think you know the answer. With guys it's always who caught the biggest fish, bagged the hot girl, has the most money and the biggest toys. Substance always takes a back seat....for many.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jmbmm
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
5
10-30-2015 06:10 PM
nal991
991
14
08-24-2015 04:39 PM
Rumrunner
Charity Notices/Events
0
08-20-2015 11:07 AM
ppwchiang
991
7
08-20-2015 10:28 AM
mjacobellis
GT3/GT2
0
08-20-2015 09:13 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 991 to last 14 years?!



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:21 AM.