991

991 Pricing Ridiculous...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #106  
Old 01-27-2012, 07:55 AM
jaspergtr's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 6,220
Rep Power: 497
jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Manifold
I don't disagree that Porsche is going in a direction which supports their business interest, nor do I fault them for that. But it does seem odd to change the steering in a way that could diminish enjoyment for a minimal gain in efficiency.

As far as road vs track, the point is that a car will ideally be both fun and capable in both environments, and especially on the road, where it's usually driven. If road fun is compromised for the sake of track (and road) capability, I'm not sure that's the best way to go.
Fair enough. Perhaps Porsche is taking this opportunity to 'draw that line in the sand' and say - "If you track, you NEED a GT3, and if you don't, don't get a GT3. We didn't design the 991 911 C2/C4/Turbo to be a track car, but rather a comfortable luxury grand tourer, with performance equal to or superior to the recognized supercars for today."

BUT as far as efficiency, big gains can made by a bunch of small improvements.
 
  #107  
Old 01-27-2012, 11:42 AM
hroussard's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,153
Rep Power: 196
hroussard Is a GOD !hroussard Is a GOD !hroussard Is a GOD !hroussard Is a GOD !hroussard Is a GOD !hroussard Is a GOD !hroussard Is a GOD !hroussard Is a GOD !hroussard Is a GOD !hroussard Is a GOD !hroussard Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Speedraser
Excellent question/comment. I am having a hard time understanding why Porsche went to electric steering in the 991. Superb steering feel has always been one of things that was central to a 911 being a great drive -- why jeopardize this? Obviously, they did it to improve fuel economy/cut emissions, but by their own figures the savings attributable to EPAS are very small. Seems to me it's quite likely that they could have done all of the things they did with the 991 except for going to EPAS -- and thereby produced a car that is every bit as good, fast and capable while also being more tactile and involving at reasonable speeds and at very high speeds.

Andrew Frankel -- a true 911 fan -- wrote a very interesting review of the 991 in the current issue of Motorsport. In short, he said that the car is absolutely incredible. He also said that it was extremely easy to drive, and that it has become so capable that he "was so concerned that the process of domesticating the 911 had finally gone a step too far..." He wondered whether, underneath all the sophistication, there "still beat the heart of the world's greatest sports car." So, he "thrashed" it to find out. And he found that "heart."

However... he said the EPAS is great by EPAS standards, which is a massive qualification. He had to comprehensively thrash the car to find its soul -- it was there, but it wasn't apparent until he drove it at truly enormous speeds. He said "if you know where to look," it's "a hard-core driving machine" but that "you have to search too hard to find this other side of its character."

That's what concerns me -- it's undoubtedly an extraordinary car, but if it has to be driven at huge speeds at the absolute ragged edge to be truly involving, it may be what I'm looking for.

I hope my concerns prove unfounded.
I believe electric steering adds to fuel economy numbers.... not sure but I read that somewhere...
 
  #108  
Old 01-27-2012, 12:05 PM
John McLane's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 548
Rep Power: 45
John McLane is a splendid one to beholdJohn McLane is a splendid one to beholdJohn McLane is a splendid one to beholdJohn McLane is a splendid one to beholdJohn McLane is a splendid one to beholdJohn McLane is a splendid one to beholdJohn McLane is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by hroussard
I believe electric steering adds to fuel economy numbers.... not sure but I read that somewhere...

True, less than 1 mpg. I wouldn't doubt that this electric steering will be gone in a year or 2. They artificially decrease effort in higher speeds. I guess it might be good (according to reviews) if you never had a 911 before, perhaps not so good if you can compare with your 997.

I tried the 650i with and without it, and the difference is substantial. The new M5 will come with hydraulic steering while the regular 5 series have electric steering. It seems that BMW is more serious about their ultimate driving machines than the no substitutes from Porsche... Those are much bigger and heavier cars, of course.

I guess we need to wait until feb 4th when some of our friends here take deliver.
 
  #109  
Old 01-27-2012, 12:12 PM
jaspergtr's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 6,220
Rep Power: 497
jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by John McLane
True, less than 1 mpg. I wouldn't doubt that this electric steering will be gone in a year or 2. They artificially decrease effort in higher speeds. I guess it might be good (according to reviews) if you never had a 911 before, perhaps not so good if you can compare with your 997.

I tried the 650i with and without it, and the difference is substantial. The new M5 will come with hydraulic steering while the regular 5 series have electric steering. It seems that BMW is more serious about their ultimate driving machines than the no substitutes from Porsche... Those are much bigger and heavier cars, of course.

I guess we need to wait until feb 4th when some of our friends here take deliver.
My prediction is that most (if not all) will enjoy it - saying that although it is lighter it is still wonderful. Or they will say nothing at all, being as they liked the idea of a 991 THAT much that they've been on a waiting list, and won't admit a single fault with the steering (perhaps sighting other issues/preferences). Unfortunately, I believe this is one of those 'preference' things that you mentioned - if you've owned a previous 911, you'll notice it, if you haven't - it will go unnoticed.
 
  #110  
Old 01-27-2012, 08:40 PM
Speedraser's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 852
Rep Power: 59
Speedraser has much to be proud ofSpeedraser has much to be proud ofSpeedraser has much to be proud ofSpeedraser has much to be proud ofSpeedraser has much to be proud ofSpeedraser has much to be proud ofSpeedraser has much to be proud ofSpeedraser has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by Manifold
I don't disagree that Porsche is going in a direction which supports their business interest, nor do I fault them for that. But it does seem odd to change the steering in a way that could diminish enjoyment for a minimal gain in efficiency.

As far as road vs track, the point is that a car will ideally be both fun and capable in both environments, and especially on the road, where it's usually driven. If road fun is compromised for the sake of track (and road) capability, I'm not sure that's the best way to go.
Case in point -- the 997. It's a great drive on the road and on the track, and it doesn't need to be thrashed within an inch of its life to be tactile and involving as a road car. It sounds like the 991 does -- the "negative" reviews are negative because of this, and the "positive" reviews also say it feels very "normal" until it's flying -- then it's awesome.

To compromise the steering feel for the sake of less than a single mpg in a 911 -- not a Cayenne, not a Panamera, but a 911 -- seems extremely foolish.

I understand why Porsche is building cars that are more suitable for more people, but I don't have to like it. I remember a Porsche magazine advert for the 911 from not that long ago, and the caption went something like, "It's not the right car for everyone, but it is the perfect car for someone." It may now be the right car for far more people, but it may no longer be the perfect car for that someone. That someone may be me. I do look forward to finding out.
 
  #111  
Old 01-27-2012, 08:51 PM
Speedraser's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 852
Rep Power: 59
Speedraser has much to be proud ofSpeedraser has much to be proud ofSpeedraser has much to be proud ofSpeedraser has much to be proud ofSpeedraser has much to be proud ofSpeedraser has much to be proud ofSpeedraser has much to be proud ofSpeedraser has much to be proud of
One more thing. IMO it's a crying shame that (like the Boxster and Cayman) the engine is completely invisible.
 
  #112  
Old 01-27-2012, 09:08 PM
KYROCKS's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 137
Rep Power: 19
KYROCKS is infamous around these parts
Saw one today at the dealership. Not that impressed. Great car though, just not for me....yet.
 
  #113  
Old 01-28-2012, 04:53 AM
Red Devil's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Gatsby's area
Posts: 2,818
Rep Power: 140
Red Devil is a name known to allRed Devil is a name known to allRed Devil is a name known to allRed Devil is a name known to allRed Devil is a name known to allRed Devil is a name known to all
The electric steering may also have to do with overall vehicular integration as they move more into electronic/computer controls. This has been with us and is ever increasing. It seems to me manufacturers are "re-inventing the wheel" in some cases just because, and in other cases, we will probably see why as the future comes.
 
  #114  
Old 01-28-2012, 08:27 AM
uhn2000's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,310
Rep Power: 84
uhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by KYROCKS
Saw one today at the dealership. Not that impressed. Great car though, just not for me....yet.
Thats because you have nicer cars from the 997 generation. Lets face it if you owned a wide body of any type the slimmer usually does not do much for you.
 
  #115  
Old 01-28-2012, 09:02 AM
EricP's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ..
Posts: 832
Rep Power: 70
EricP has a reputation beyond reputeEricP has a reputation beyond reputeEricP has a reputation beyond reputeEricP has a reputation beyond reputeEricP has a reputation beyond reputeEricP has a reputation beyond reputeEricP has a reputation beyond reputeEricP has a reputation beyond reputeEricP has a reputation beyond reputeEricP has a reputation beyond reputeEricP has a reputation beyond repute
The hands on reviews I've watched (video) with electric steering all have a similar take - they say it makes the car follow a line thru a turn better. The insist that it really helps when tracking the car as it's very precise. I'm not sure how the previous was less precise but the reports have been largely positive in favor of the new steering system.
 
  #116  
Old 01-28-2012, 09:14 AM
buck986's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,759
Rep Power: 183
buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by EricP
The hands on reviews I've watched (video) with electric steering all have a similar take - they say it makes the car follow a line thru a turn better. The insist that it really helps when tracking the car as it's very precise. I'm not sure how the previous was less precise but the reports have been largely positive in favor of the new steering system.
With a 997 you really need to work as a driver to take a turn flat out and perfectly balanced.

The 991 seems to have taken out some of the driver input needed to do this.

I say seems to since I have not driven one nor to I know of anyone test driving here that has really driven the 991 to it's limit on a turn on a closed track.

I guess there are drivers who possess more talent then the 991 can handle. But it seems to me there is little that you can throw at this car that it won't handle.
 
  #117  
Old 01-28-2012, 10:06 AM
tgcrun's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 17
tgcrun is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Speedraser
One more thing. IMO it's a crying shame that (like the Boxster and Cayman) the engine is completely invisible.
This has been mentioned a few times. I just added some oil to my 997.2 C4S and took a good look at the engine compartment. Maybe it's not completely invisible, but there's not much engine to be seen there, either.
 
  #118  
Old 01-28-2012, 11:53 AM
Psycho Sid's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,810
Rep Power: 319
Psycho Sid Is a GOD !Psycho Sid Is a GOD !Psycho Sid Is a GOD !Psycho Sid Is a GOD !Psycho Sid Is a GOD !Psycho Sid Is a GOD !Psycho Sid Is a GOD !Psycho Sid Is a GOD !Psycho Sid Is a GOD !Psycho Sid Is a GOD !Psycho Sid Is a GOD !
you guys better get used to it because soon... there will be no more stick shift
Never mind the GPS guided cruise controls (which will become a push for autonomous driving) or the drowse detection (with camera's watching your every expression... great for big brother to log into) or the lane change assist or the.... you get the picture

All kidding aside, I've has a chance to sit and revs the engine on the 991 last week (like a kid hehehe) and have to say the int. is impeccable, wow just wow!
It certainly reflects the $$ you're paying for it.

It sounds amazing, TRULY!!!
And the outside looks longer, wider and lower... but (yes there's a but) in real life the difference between the 997 and 991 is not obvious, sure certain thing do jump out but I'm willing to bet that (outside of the rear lights and DRL's) the average person on the street is not going to see the difference...
Also it looks a lot wider in the pics than in real life... that was kinda of disappointing I really thought I could get away with the narrow body version of the 991, now I'm not so sure...
Which brings us back to $$$ is it worth getting a new (non wide-body) 991 S cab or am I better of getting a "new" 2011 997 Turbo cab for the same price!?
Or for that kind of money even a real "super car" like a slightly used SLS Gull-wing or roadster ?!

I'm more confused than ever
 
  #119  
Old 01-28-2012, 01:17 PM
Manifold's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,670
Rep Power: 194
Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Psycho Sid
you guys better get used to it because soon... there will be no more stick shift
Never mind the GPS guided cruise controls (which will become a push for autonomous driving) or the drowse detection (with camera's watching your every expression... great for big brother to log into) or the lane change assist or the.... you get the picture

All kidding aside, I've has a chance to sit and revs the engine on the 991 last week (like a kid hehehe) and have to say the int. is impeccable, wow just wow!
It certainly reflects the $$ you're paying for it.

It sounds amazing, TRULY!!!
And the outside looks longer, wider and lower... but (yes there's a but) in real life the difference between the 997 and 991 is not obvious, sure certain thing do jump out but I'm willing to bet that (outside of the rear lights and DRL's) the average person on the street is not going to see the difference...
Also it looks a lot wider in the pics than in real life... that was kinda of disappointing I really thought I could get away with the narrow body version of the 991, now I'm not so sure...
Which brings us back to $$$ is it worth getting a new (non wide-body) 991 S cab or am I better of getting a "new" 2011 997 Turbo cab for the same price!?
Or for that kind of money even a real "super car" like a slightly used SLS Gull-wing or roadster ?!

I'm more confused than ever
I've driven the SLS on the track and I think the 911 is the better sports car, in addition to costing much less. Compared to the 911, the SLS feels big and heavy, though it does have a very cool retro appeal and a menacing burbling sound.
 
  #120  
Old 01-28-2012, 02:45 PM
PT Doc's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rockies
Posts: 930
Rep Power: 92
PT Doc has a reputation beyond reputePT Doc has a reputation beyond reputePT Doc has a reputation beyond reputePT Doc has a reputation beyond reputePT Doc has a reputation beyond reputePT Doc has a reputation beyond reputePT Doc has a reputation beyond reputePT Doc has a reputation beyond reputePT Doc has a reputation beyond reputePT Doc has a reputation beyond reputePT Doc has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by jaspergtr
Fair enough. Perhaps Porsche is taking this opportunity to 'draw that line in the sand' and say - "If you track, you NEED a GT3, and if you don't, don't get a GT3. We didn't design the 991 911 C2/C4/Turbo to be a track car, but rather a comfortable luxury grand tourer, with performance equal to or superior to the recognized supercars for today."

BUT as far as efficiency, big gains can made by a bunch of small improvements.
Very well stated. I tend to agree that they are designing cars for a specific task. It makes sense with all the variants they have.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: 991 Pricing Ridiculous...



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:25 AM.