Bogus 900 RWHP dyno graph?
#17
Marty, Marty, Marty . . . nice try, but your latest transparent attempt to denigrate me fails yet again.
First, the "GT950" tag that remains below my avatar has nothing whatsoever to do with this thread.
Second, I acknowledged LONG ago that the "GT950" tag was ill-conceived and I have asked the Mods of this site countless times to remove the tag, but to no avail. Ask Sharky, Darren, or your buddy Scott. I asked each of them long ago to remove the "GT950" tag, but they are unable to do so. Rather, only the enigmatic Shank can remove such tags and he declined to respond to my multiple requests to have the tag removed.
Third, depending on the appropriate drivetrain loss figure to be used (recall that my car was a Tip), my car ultimately made horsepower and torque in the range of, or above, 900 at the fly wheel (the torque was very close to 950 at the flywheel), so the ill-conceived "GT950" tag was not far off. Nevertheless, I would prefer to have it removed. If you can accomplish this for me, I would be grateful.
Regards,
Craig
First, the "GT950" tag that remains below my avatar has nothing whatsoever to do with this thread.
Second, I acknowledged LONG ago that the "GT950" tag was ill-conceived and I have asked the Mods of this site countless times to remove the tag, but to no avail. Ask Sharky, Darren, or your buddy Scott. I asked each of them long ago to remove the "GT950" tag, but they are unable to do so. Rather, only the enigmatic Shank can remove such tags and he declined to respond to my multiple requests to have the tag removed.
Third, depending on the appropriate drivetrain loss figure to be used (recall that my car was a Tip), my car ultimately made horsepower and torque in the range of, or above, 900 at the fly wheel (the torque was very close to 950 at the flywheel), so the ill-conceived "GT950" tag was not far off. Nevertheless, I would prefer to have it removed. If you can accomplish this for me, I would be grateful.
Regards,
Craig
#20
Regards,
Craig
Last edited by Craig; 03-14-2008 at 11:51 AM.
#21
Are you planning on coming back to Porsche with a more managible level of tune? If so, will it be a 996 or 997. What system would you be looking at to meet your new sense of self awareness?
#22
Marty, Marty, Marty . . . nice try, but your latest transparent attempt to denigrate me fails yet again
^^^^ I always loved your eloquent writing^^^^^ Perjorative is what I am
.
Craig,
You ought to fly to Houston, some really fast cars will be there!
MK
^^^^ I always loved your eloquent writing^^^^^ Perjorative is what I am
.
Craig,
You ought to fly to Houston, some really fast cars will be there!
MK
#23
Regards,
Craig
#25
Regards,
Craig
#26
Craig
#29
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL