RPM News! Eddie Bello breaks 1200rwhp barrier!
#46
markski
__________________
![](https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic3357_8.gif)
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
![](https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic3357_8.gif)
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
#47
Scott, no offense, but whoever did your car on the dyno must not have done a few tricks to get it to hook on the dyno (it's not hard btw). I watched my brothers car make 900+rwtq on a 19" street tire in a Vette. I've also dynoed 9xx rwhp Diesels that made 1500+rwtq and they didn't spin a tire. I know you've got traps speeds to back it up, but dynos are always nice (and also awesome for bragging rights). Hell my 8sec Camaro was put on the dyno just so I had a number lol.
#48
Hey I will have my car back in a week and I will dyno it on a dyno jet first and then a hub dyno. Then everyone can see if there is or is not a differnce. Then these types of threads can have a conclusion.
Jag
#49
Rick Flair, once said, "to be the man you have to BEAT the man" is that simple, UNLESS you have a time slip of 9.16 or better with your Porsche and a 1200 rwhp sheet or better, Bello is the man to Beat ! Simple.
We are in 2008, if the water cooled or any other Porsche has NOT gone into this territory is not for the lack of technology.
Like him or not, is easy to criticize him, the fact is that the numbers don't lie, the dyno numbers don't lie, if he is running 5 bar of boost or if he is in the Richard Simmons dyno who cares !
Im just a fan that apprecciate what Bello has done all alone when everyone said it was impossible. Im also a huge fan of Protomotive but that is another subject all together.
We are in 2008, if the water cooled or any other Porsche has NOT gone into this territory is not for the lack of technology.
Like him or not, is easy to criticize him, the fact is that the numbers don't lie, the dyno numbers don't lie, if he is running 5 bar of boost or if he is in the Richard Simmons dyno who cares !
Im just a fan that apprecciate what Bello has done all alone when everyone said it was impossible. Im also a huge fan of Protomotive but that is another subject all together.
#50
Dont get me wrong - its amazing what this man has done and my hats off to him. Congrats brother and well done!
This stuff with the dyno needs to be addressed but in a thread of its own.
This stuff with the dyno needs to be addressed but in a thread of its own.
#51
Fact is this is the 996tt Watercooled board and every few weeks we get an update of how this aircooled beast (which has been making crazy power since the mid 90's) is doing. Like I said earlier I rather see an accomplishment thread on Tims car a 996TT(im super interested about!). Save the power bragging for the correct board. Only connection to his car I have is this dyno that reads F'ed up. Thats it! Doesn't need its own thread. Theres 3 on the tx2k8!
S
S
#52
![Smilie](https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#53
I agree the dyno BS has to be look into, but now we go one more step, what is actual loss % from flywheel to wheels on the Porsche cars, not a he said, she said actual numbers
I have ask 20 people and I got 20 diferent answers
![Confused](https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
#54
As far as my car; I tried it once...and it slipped so badly on a Mustang dyno that it almost came off. I have nothing to prove in regards to dyno numbers...so I won't bother trying it again.
I'll continue using my trap speeds and 60-130 time as proof of my power.
Regardless; Suman needs to watch what he posts.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 04-03-2008 at 07:02 PM.
#55
I believe for RWD the loss is approximately 12% if I'm not mistaken, and then for AWD it was 18%.
#56
Scott, no offense, but whoever did your car on the dyno must not have done a few tricks to get it to hook on the dyno (it's not hard btw). I watched my brothers car make 900+rwtq on a 19" street tire in a Vette. I've also dynoed 9xx rwhp Diesels that made 1500+rwtq and they didn't spin a tire. I know you've got traps speeds to back it up, but dynos are always nice (and also awesome for bragging rights). Hell my 8sec Camaro was put on the dyno just so I had a number lol.
#57
Umm...Markski's 870 rwhp dyno? For your information, it was done on a Dynojet long before Todd had his Dyna-Pak.
As far as my car; I tried it once...and it slipped so badly on a Mustang dyno that it almost came off. I have nothing to prove in regards to dyno numbers...so I won't bother trying it again.
I'll continue using my trap speeds and 60-130 time as proof of my power.
As far as my car; I tried it once...and it slipped so badly on a Mustang dyno that it almost came off. I have nothing to prove in regards to dyno numbers...so I won't bother trying it again.
I'll continue using my trap speeds and 60-130 time as proof of my power.
#58
Sounds good, this is the kind of information I enjoy coming to this forum for, and hopefully we can keep the Drama for the GT-R threads. so what is the story on the RED car?
#59
![Stick Out Tongue](https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
All kidding aside. To be entirely honest I don't know all of the details on the car yet. It ran 10.9 @ 139mph at Atco stock motor, just basic upgrades, thats the extent of my knowledge on the car.
I'll be sure to get all the info though and make a big thread about it.
![Smilie](https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)