996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

First Check Engine Light

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #16  
Old 08-09-2008 | 05:05 PM
MY996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,119
From: Bay Area
Rep Power: 227
MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Flyfisher
Yep, I have the EVO V-Flow intake. Will that cause the MAF sensor to fail? I might try to find an Autozone today and see if they will read the codes for me.

Is a radio code needed for an '04? I have gone through all my documents and can't find a radio code.
I have a 04 with Nav and don't need the radio code when resetting the battery.
 
  #17  
Old 08-09-2008 | 07:29 PM
ard's Avatar
ard
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,981
From: N. California
Rep Power: 296
ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Flyfisher
What are the two banks referring two? Do they refer to each exhaust? If so, I'd find it unusual that sensors failed on both sides at the same time.

So should I try to reset the codes first and see the errors pop again, or should I just take it to the dealer? I'd love to find an indy Porsche certified mechanic here in Michigan.
Who installed the "new Exhaust"??

To have both sides show up would point to either they swapped pre- and post- cat O2 sensors, or they didn't properly connect the post cat sensors.

Funny to get 1000 miles before it shows up....Or maybe slathered antisieze paste on them leading to fouling?

I'd ask whoever installed the exhaust to give it a look ... actually re-reading your post, if it was you- you need to check your O2s and wiring...

A
 
  #18  
Old 08-09-2008 | 07:42 PM
Flyfisher's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 129
From: MI
Rep Power: 22
Flyfisher is infamous around these parts
I installed the exhaust myself. I was very careful with the O2 sensors to avoid fouling them, and I am certain they are connected correctly. As I recall, I only had one sensor per side. I haven't looked into where the others are. I think I may pick up a Durametric and reset the codes then wait and see if I get them again. If so, I guess I'll have to pull the sensors. I still don't understand how both banks could fail at the same time.
 
  #19  
Old 08-09-2008 | 08:03 PM
wross996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,661
Rep Power: 252
wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !
Just disconnect the battery for a few minutes to reset the codes
 
  #20  
Old 08-09-2008 | 08:27 PM
oak's Avatar
oak
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,741
From: So Bay, LA
Rep Power: 141
oak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud of
did you check to see if the front / rear o2 sensors may have been flipped when installing new exhaust? I think has been posted a few times.... you should have 2 sensors per side not one.
 
  #21  
Old 08-10-2008 | 08:15 AM
liquidcool's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 142
From: ohio
Rep Power: 23
liquidcool is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by ard
4. Liquid- I disagree entirely with your indy. A large number of the CEL faults will impact AFR, which in turn can damage the engine. Not immediately, but over time. For example a CEL due to an overly rich condition can increase fuel wash in the cyl wall, and fuel contamination in the oil- both increase ring wear and bearing wear- not 'engine will sieze tomorrow' but over time they will have an impact. THis is not meant to be scare tactic, but the concept that the CEL is just some 'silly emissions crap' is wrong.

A
I did not mean to suggest that the CEL can just be ignored as just a silly emissions light. I would never drive with the light on without having the codes read to be sure what the problem is. I was merely suggesting that there are many reason CEL will come on and as long as it indicates a condition which won't damage anything (which is almost all of them), then it's not urgent to get it repaired and the car can continue to be driven.
 
  #22  
Old 08-10-2008 | 08:20 AM
wross996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,661
Rep Power: 252
wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by liquidcool
I did not mean to suggest that the CEL can just be ignored as just a silly emissions light. I would never drive with the light on without having the codes read to be sure what the problem is. I was merely suggesting that there are many reason CEL will come on and as long as it indicates a condition which won't damage anything (which is almost all of them), then it's not urgent to get it repaired and the car can continue to be driven.
What ARD was pointing out was your in first quote
My Indy (who read the codes for me) told me not to worry about since it's totally useless and won't affect the engine. In fact, he said the only real CEL to worry about is a blinking one which means the catalytic converter isn't working. He told me to drive it like I stole it until he can get me in to fix it. I wouldn't worry about it, but you do want to get that code read.
your indy is not only wrong, but providing bad information.
 
  #23  
Old 08-10-2008 | 05:20 PM
liquidcool's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 142
From: ohio
Rep Power: 23
liquidcool is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by wross996TT
What ARD was pointing out was your in first quote

your indy is not only wrong, but providing bad information.
I don't want to get into a flame war over this or hijack this thread, but my indy read the codes and told me not to worry about it until he can get me in later this week to correct the problem with the SAI system. He has serviced my porsches for the last 10 years and he knows them inside and out and has never streered me wrong. I think in owning cars like these it's important to have a knowledgable mechanic that you can trust and I'm very happy to say I have one.

Perhaps you can describe a situation in which continuing to drive during failure of the SAI blower/sensor/system could lead to engine damage? I've done some research and it's my understanding that the blower only runs during cold starts to preheat the exhaust and to ensure unburnt fuel is burned before exiting the tailpipe. I'm not a car expert and I'm always eager to learn more about these cars so if I'm wrong, please let me know.
 
  #24  
Old 08-10-2008 | 06:14 PM
art4iza's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,190
From: L.A.
Rep Power: 274
art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !
I agree, as soon as I saw the thread my hunch was the O2 sensors. There should be two on each side. I would have a professional tuner look at it.

Originally Posted by wross996TT
I first check to see the O2 sensors are hooked up properly, reset and see what happens.
 
  #25  
Old 08-10-2008 | 06:42 PM
Flyfisher's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 129
From: MI
Rep Power: 22
Flyfisher is infamous around these parts
Went back and looked at the pictures I took when I was swapping out the exhaust, and lo and behold, I see two sensors! My age is affecting my memory!

I don't know of an indy tuner here in Michigan, so my choice is to replace the sensors myself or take the car to my local Porsche dealership. My concern in doing it myself is that if something caused the O2 sensors to fail (remember both failed at the same time), I could replace the sensors and soon be in the market for another set.

I have had sensors go in other cars, and the cars performance noticeably suffers. I see no change in performance in the 996TT. I didn't have time to do anything today other than order a Durametric reader. Rather than disconnect the battery, I'll just wait until this unit shows up to reset the CEL. If I get the error codes again, I'll find a mechanic.

Ken
 
  #26  
Old 08-10-2008 | 07:28 PM
wross996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,661
Rep Power: 252
wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by liquidcool
I don't want to get into a flame war over this or hijack this thread, but my indy read the codes and told me not to worry about it until he can get me in later this week to correct the problem with the SAI system. He has serviced my porsches for the last 10 years and he knows them inside and out and has never streered me wrong. I think in owning cars like these it's important to have a knowledgable mechanic that you can trust and I'm very happy to say I have one.

Perhaps you can describe a situation in which continuing to drive during failure of the SAI blower/sensor/system could lead to engine damage? I've done some research and it's my understanding that the blower only runs during cold starts to preheat the exhaust and to ensure unburnt fuel is burned before exiting the tailpipe. I'm not a car expert and I'm always eager to learn more about these cars so if I'm wrong, please let me know.
Dude...this thread is not about you or what your car codes read...blah, blah, blah. It is about the OP and you have no idea what his codes are...so your advice (or your indy's) is bad. That is all!
 
  #27  
Old 08-10-2008 | 08:48 PM
liquidcool's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 142
From: ohio
Rep Power: 23
liquidcool is infamous around these parts
Well so much for not wanting to start a flame war...
 
  #28  
Old 08-10-2008 | 11:07 PM
igdawgi's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 374
From: San Lorenzo,CA
Rep Power: 42
igdawgi has much to be proud ofigdawgi has much to be proud ofigdawgi has much to be proud ofigdawgi has much to be proud ofigdawgi has much to be proud ofigdawgi has much to be proud ofigdawgi has much to be proud ofigdawgi has much to be proud of
I had my TT and had my first CEL on at about 30k miles. It ended up to be diverter valves....
 
  #29  
Old 08-14-2008 | 04:13 PM
Flyfisher's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 129
From: MI
Rep Power: 22
Flyfisher is infamous around these parts
My Durametric software and cable showed up today. I installed the software on my laptop and hooked it up to the car. I got the same codes as Autozone did, but my software identified the issue as Cat Efficiency related to each bank. I used the software to reset the error and started the car. No CEL light. I let the car run for a bit then turned it off and started it again. Still no light.

I'm not enough of a wrencher to know what exactly initiated these errors. The car had been sitting outside in the sun all day. I started it in the evening to head home, and the CEL light remained lit after the remaining cluster idiot lights turned off. As the errors hit right when the car was started and both cats were effected, I'm hoping the issue was nothing more than perhaps some vapors or fuel in the cats when the engine was started. I'll drive it for awhile and see if the errors come back.

Outside of those errors, the software reported no other issues. Very easy software to use, and I found perusing the motronic information rather interesting.

Despite the money this forum has urged me to spend, I find it and you all a great resource. Only wish I could contribute more.

Many thanks!

Ken
 
  #30  
Old 08-14-2008 | 05:23 PM
ttboost's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,453
From: CT
Rep Power: 438
ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !
Is it possible his cats are a little too free flowing? tripping out the rear O2's? Anyone else have this problem?
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: First Check Engine Light



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:18 AM.