996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

what happened to the site?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #31  
Old 11-12-2008 | 09:23 PM
MotorsportsR's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 291
From: Pomona
Rep Power: 36
MotorsportsR is a splendid one to beholdMotorsportsR is a splendid one to beholdMotorsportsR is a splendid one to beholdMotorsportsR is a splendid one to beholdMotorsportsR is a splendid one to beholdMotorsportsR is a splendid one to beholdMotorsportsR is a splendid one to behold
Those advertisements on the left are throwing me off! I have been to many sites and sooner or later it will get bought off by sponsors. Once bought off, you will NOT be able to share your bad or negative experience with a sponsor. The moment you post something negative about them, bam, you are suspended or your tread removed! "That's just not Internet"!
 
  #32  
Old 11-12-2008 | 09:35 PM
kilrgt's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,309
From: Toronto Canada
Rep Power: 80
kilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to behold
I hate to say it but there have been a few bans already and it nothing to do with sponsors,I wont say any names but there has been two very known members that are gone...so i don't think you can really voice your opinions now, some moderators don't like it.
 
  #33  
Old 11-12-2008 | 10:17 PM
Chuck Jones's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 961
From: Elk Grove, CA
Rep Power: 88
Chuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond repute
If folks are being banned, then it has to be in connection with a violation of some published or documented policies...which would be available to you as a guidline for what the moderators expect as acceptable website demeanor. If it becomes a matter of just arbitrarily banning someone without having a policy in place to use as "evidence" of your violation....then I would think that you might have recourse.....but then again, if it becomes that chicken-****, I wouldn't want to stick around anyway.

All this is jumping the gun and presupposing that things are going to go to hell in a hand basket. Remember, the folks who bought up these forums are not looking to pick or start fights with or between the forum membership and the sponsors. The success of this forum depends upon maintaining a balance between a happy forum membership (that's us) and the vendors who provide the funding to keep it running. Without either one, you don't have a forum and your "investment" flounders...plain and simple rule of supply and demand. The vendors provide the supply (called $$$ to IB to advertise for service or products)...and we (forum membership guys and gals) provide the demand in terms of buying the products being advertised.

As a very important part of this equation....we...the forum membership occupy a critical role in the ongoing success or failure of this forum. Therefore, our collective assessment of what we like or dont' like should be something that IB takes very seriously. The mere fact that one person dissents should not give cause for that person to worry about being banned....unless, as I indicated earlier, you violate the ground rules that are posted in the forum guidelines. So I would encourage you to individually or collectively to speak up if there's something you don't like...and work together with the Administrators and moderators to make it work for everyone. I'm sure that's what IB wants.
 
  #34  
Old 11-12-2008 | 10:39 PM
kilrgt's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,309
From: Toronto Canada
Rep Power: 80
kilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to behold
Chuck I hear ya, but its happened.I would not be apposed to a membership fee like over at rennlist, it does allow a more honest post, and it can help keep the spammers out..
 

Last edited by kilrgt; 11-12-2008 at 10:48 PM.
  #35  
Old 11-12-2008 | 10:50 PM
Chuck Jones's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 961
From: Elk Grove, CA
Rep Power: 88
Chuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by kilrgt
Chuck I hear ya, but its happened.I would not be apposed to a membership fee like over at rennlist, it does allow a more honest post, and it can help keeping the spammers out..
I'm not sure how charging a membership fee would be instrumental in allowing a more "honest post". An honest post is the product of a fair, mature, and credible person who's posting the comment regardless of whether a fee is involved or not...and spammers are a control issue for the site moderators and administrators in concert with appropriate security software.....I guess you'd have to show me what I could reasonably expect to get by paying a fee....not that I mind paying one kuz it certainly wouldn't break my bank account....but what are you going to give me for that fee that I don't already get?
 
  #36  
Old 11-12-2008 | 10:53 PM
EZ Cookin's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,257
From: New Braunfels, TX
Rep Power: 81
EZ Cookin has much to be proud ofEZ Cookin has much to be proud ofEZ Cookin has much to be proud ofEZ Cookin has much to be proud ofEZ Cookin has much to be proud ofEZ Cookin has much to be proud ofEZ Cookin has much to be proud ofEZ Cookin has much to be proud ofEZ Cookin has much to be proud ofEZ Cookin has much to be proud of
Though we don't like change, it is still among the best sites to learn about mods for our cars. Also, it is a good place for vendors to connect to the relatively small group of us who own these cars. I have not felt they are shoving products down our throat. but they do continue to have a larger impact on this site. So for now, I'm still a 6speed fan.
 
  #37  
Old 11-12-2008 | 11:53 PM
ard's Avatar
ard
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,981
From: N. California
Rep Power: 296
ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Chuck Jones
If folks are being banned, then it has to be in connection with a violation of some published or documented policies...which would be available to you as a guidline for what the moderators expect as acceptable website demeanor. If it becomes a matter of just arbitrarily banning someone without having a policy in place to use as "evidence" of your violation....then I would think that you might have recourse.....but then again, if it becomes that chicken-****, I wouldn't want to stick around anyway.
Don't kid yourself. there are no 'rules'. Anyone can be banned for any reason at all, or none.


There are two reasons to have members:
1. Create 'content' for the site and increases traffic.
2. Buy stuff from vendors.

Anything negative about vendors or modding in general is not desirable. creating an environment where people feel modding is safe, cheap, easy- or that 'everyone is doing it' is highly desirable.

The only reason to not allow vendors total control is that we will all leave quickly. Their challenge is balancing vendor demands against member satisfaction.

A...

PS EZ...you don't think vendors have a large impact? Vivid is giving free proudct in exchange for positive posts from 'independent' members.... OK with you?
 
  #38  
Old 11-13-2008 | 12:01 AM
Oliver B's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 36
From: Germany
Rep Power: 21
Oliver B is infamous around these parts
Sorry, don´t like it. And the blinking vividracing mini ad is really annoying.
 
  #39  
Old 11-13-2008 | 12:15 AM
Chuck Jones's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 961
From: Elk Grove, CA
Rep Power: 88
Chuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond repute
Damn Ard...you were right. I went to the forum rules and to my amazement, there are no guidelines, rules, or policies for what constitutes unacceptable conduct on this forum....that flies in the face of every forum I've seen. How can you expect to enforce something if there are no guidelines for folks to gauge what's acceptable versus what isn't?

I used to write useage policies for governmental websites, email systems etc....so the fact that I couldn't find anything on this site was a real eye opener for me. It also gives rise to the issue of discriminatory exclusion with no forewarning.....interesting to say the least. So...if you know, what were the folks who were summarily "dismissed" from this forum guilty of? Do you know? What is considered as grounds for exculsion? Wait...you already said it was for.....???? Interesting.
 
  #40  
Old 11-13-2008 | 12:42 AM
ard's Avatar
ard
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,981
From: N. California
Rep Power: 296
ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Chuck Jones
Damn Ard...you were right. I went to the forum rules and to my amazement, there are no guidelines, rules, or policies for what constitutes unacceptable conduct on this forum....that flies in the face of every forum I've seen. How can you expect to enforce something if there are no guidelines for folks to gauge what's acceptable versus what isn't?.
and you think rennlist is any different??? Their written 'rules' are simply a vestige of the 'old days'

There used to be 'rules' against how often vendors could post "see my stuff" in main forums... HAHAHHA
 
  #41  
Old 11-13-2008 | 01:07 AM
kilrgt's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,309
From: Toronto Canada
Rep Power: 80
kilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to behold
ard
Thank you, someone that gets it.
 
  #42  
Old 11-13-2008 | 08:26 AM
rdss's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,018
From: el salvador
Rep Power: 145
rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !
I don't like it.It takes too much time to go to the forum
 
  #43  
Old 11-13-2008 | 09:49 AM
landjet's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,633
From: Maryland
Rep Power: 275
landjet Is a GOD !landjet Is a GOD !landjet Is a GOD !landjet Is a GOD !landjet Is a GOD !landjet Is a GOD !landjet Is a GOD !landjet Is a GOD !landjet Is a GOD !landjet Is a GOD !landjet Is a GOD !
At least it's a lot quicker than before. One of the moderators told me IB could care less what we think, all they want is their money.
 

Last edited by landjet; 11-13-2008 at 09:53 AM.
  #44  
Old 11-13-2008 | 09:56 AM
Jorgeassoc's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,063
From: California
Rep Power: 117
Jorgeassoc has a brilliant futureJorgeassoc has a brilliant futureJorgeassoc has a brilliant futureJorgeassoc has a brilliant futureJorgeassoc has a brilliant futureJorgeassoc has a brilliant futureJorgeassoc has a brilliant futureJorgeassoc has a brilliant futureJorgeassoc has a brilliant futureJorgeassoc has a brilliant futureJorgeassoc has a brilliant future
its gonna be tough to get used to
 
  #45  
Old 11-13-2008 | 10:06 AM
RiA's Avatar
RiA
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,611
From: South OC
Rep Power: 248
RiA Is a GOD !RiA Is a GOD !RiA Is a GOD !RiA Is a GOD !RiA Is a GOD !RiA Is a GOD !RiA Is a GOD !RiA Is a GOD !RiA Is a GOD !RiA Is a GOD !RiA Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by ard
There used to be 'rules' against how often vendors could post "see my stuff" in main forums... HAHAHHA
There's just way just too much push from a certain vendor on this forum. Then to have the same vendor ask someone to post pictures of their widget on your car, is just another form of advertisement from said vendor.

I've purchased from this vendor on this forum - and was immediately asked to post how great my experience was.

Don't get me wrong, I'll give props where and when due, but to ask for it upon sale - I won't play that game.

Later I was privately called out by this same vendor for not participating the way HE wanted.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: what happened to the site?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:37 PM.