my new snails vs standard 3076's
#16
My understanding of conventional thinking is that with a stock block and 3076s that tuning would have to allow for the turbos to hit less violently than they are capable so that rods are not bent and this would introduce alot of lag.
What is yours and Marks feelings on this?
What is yours and Marks feelings on this?
#17
The OEM rods are strong! I don't know of anyone who has bent them? To further highlight this point, we can look at Scott's beast (Diverxxxtrem) he had OEM rods in his car and he never had any issues that I am aware of? I dont think the rods are the weak point. I hope this helps.
Robert
Robert
#18
My understanding of conventional thinking is that with a stock block and 3076s that tuning would have to allow for the turbos to hit less violently than they are capable so that rods are not bent and this would introduce alot of lag.
What is yours and Marks feelings on this?
What is yours and Marks feelings on this?
however, these spooled up 300 rpms faster then beat the 3076rs by about 30 rwhp at any given boost. from .8 bar 1.4 bar... (stock motor).
the tune is very conservative as well... yet it did run 5.7s a 1.4 bar on 104 octane.( our own car- gt2 with DRs).
These are very strong turbos... they actually did 932 rwhp on a 993TT...
We have 3 wheels for it.. Nick and Corey both have the middle one...
mark
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
#19
The OEM rods are strong! I don't know of anyone who has bent them? To further highlight this point, we can look at Scott's beast (Diverxxxtrem) he had OEM rods in his car and he never had any issues that I am aware of? I dont think the rods are the weak point. I hope this helps.
Robert
Robert
P.S. Scott had Pauter rods in his car when he went to GT30'S.With the 24/18's and about 600rwhp it had stock rods.https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...al-mods-3.html
#20
On this set up you are correct as far as the tuning goes...
however, these spooled up 300 rpms faster then beat the 3076rs by about 30 rwhp at any given boost. from .8 bar 1.4 bar... (stock motor).
the tune is very conservative as well... yet it did run 5.7s a 1.4 bar on 104 octane.( our own car- gt2 with DRs).
These are very strong turbos... they actually did 932 rwhp on a 993TT...
We have 3 wheels for it.. Nick and Corey both have the middle one...
mark
however, these spooled up 300 rpms faster then beat the 3076rs by about 30 rwhp at any given boost. from .8 bar 1.4 bar... (stock motor).
the tune is very conservative as well... yet it did run 5.7s a 1.4 bar on 104 octane.( our own car- gt2 with DRs).
These are very strong turbos... they actually did 932 rwhp on a 993TT...
We have 3 wheels for it.. Nick and Corey both have the middle one...
mark
#21
Rob,just and FYI.....Several people have bent the stock rods[....but] if you are **** about the fuel and boost level and the car never sees a hint of detonation and you dont do any real hard launching from a dig the car should last a good time around the 700rwhp level.Anything more and you are really playing with fire.
#22
there not that strong i bent rods 5 and 6 on 18g setup at 1.3 bar... my problem not the right fuel for the 40 degree temps it detonated and bye bye rods
tim
tim
The OEM rods are strong! I don't know of anyone who has bent them? To further highlight this point, we can look at Scott's beast (Diverxxxtrem) he had OEM rods in his car and he never had any issues that I am aware of? I dont think the rods are the weak point. I hope this helps.
Robert
Robert
#24
Bailey mark asewrd that for you .
and as Joe , said hes 100% on the money im extremely **** about checking my boost levels and AFR's constantly , and running good fuels. and i dont do runs from a dig just highway pulls. and Joe , man they are just that good as mark sais, im tottaly in awe with this setup .. i was contemplating in getting a Gallardo ,(yes tim i know LOL ) but not anymore ,the car puts a masssive grin on my face every time i get in it now just like the first day a bought it.
and as Joe , said hes 100% on the money im extremely **** about checking my boost levels and AFR's constantly , and running good fuels. and i dont do runs from a dig just highway pulls. and Joe , man they are just that good as mark sais, im tottaly in awe with this setup .. i was contemplating in getting a Gallardo ,(yes tim i know LOL ) but not anymore ,the car puts a masssive grin on my face every time i get in it now just like the first day a bought it.
#27
yup ur right it is the torque it was down low(rpm) in fourth when mine went.... o by the way im looking at a 05 blk gallardo this week
t
t
#28
and as Joe , said hes 100% on the money im extremely **** about checking my boost levels and AFR's constantly , and running good fuels. and i dont do runs from a dig just highway pulls. and Joe , man they are just that good as mark sais, im tottaly in awe with this setup .. i was contemplating in getting a Gallardo ,(yes tim i know LOL ) but not anymore ,the car puts a masssive grin on my face every time i get in it now just like the first day a bought it.
Any plans to dyno? What do you expect to get?
#30
Combination of torque and detonation seems to be the rod problem. That being said this is the case with just about any engine combination, get too aggressive and bring detonation on, your rods are going to get abused.
Can't wait to see what these new turbos do.
Can't wait to see what these new turbos do.