P-box data for joetwint's TX Mile run...
#16
Sean, most of us with "normal" cars were seeing mid to low 6's for the 60-130 at the mile...
#19
That's nice and all, but what does it make on 1 bar. That's all that really matters! Am I right?!
JK!!! Congrats again Joe you def. got a bad ***** there. It will sure surprise a lot of folks on the street!
JK!!! Congrats again Joe you def. got a bad ***** there. It will sure surprise a lot of folks on the street!
#20
It is unfathomably fast. When you see it accelerating you just can't help but think WTF. I saw nothing that was even close in acceleration to Joe's car.
#24
Joe, it was nice meeting you and the EVOMS crew. I enjoyed hanging out with you guys and look fwd to seeing you back in TX in March.
If you were at 230 mph at 4,900 ft, then at the mile (5,280 ft) you would have definately been at 232-233 (if not slightly better). NOT BAD for a shakedown run Joe Joe!
Peter
If you were at 230 mph at 4,900 ft, then at the mile (5,280 ft) you would have definately been at 232-233 (if not slightly better). NOT BAD for a shakedown run Joe Joe!
Peter
#26
Peter, i am pretty sure at 4360 ft it was at 230.....I think Scott started the run from the wrong zero point.I am gonna overlay the two graphs later I could be wrong though as you fellas are better at this than me
Last edited by joetwint; 10-19-2009 at 07:44 PM.
#27
#28
Hey brother, it's actually the only zero point on the graph. If I had started on the wrong one, I would have measured your 0-186 time incorrectly, but it was dead on (0-186 in 14.37 and 0-186.41/0-300 kph in 14.41).
I'm not sure where 4,300 feet came from. If it helps, during acceleration you were at 222 mph at 4,300 feet, 224.8 mph at 4,500 feet, 227.3 mph at 4,700 feet until you finally hit 230.00 at 4,946 feet.
You can actually see your speed at distance on the graph in the first post of this thread. Did you guys maybe send me the wrong graph?
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 10-19-2009 at 08:36 PM.
#29
Joe,
Hey brother, it's actually the only zero point on the graph. If I had started on the wrong one, I would have measured your 0-186 time incorrectly, but it was dead on (0-186 in 14.37 and 0-186.41/0-300 kph in 14.41).
I'm not sure where 4,300 feet came from. If it helps, during acceleration you were at 222 mph at 4,300 feet, 224.8 mph at 4,500 feet, 227.3 mph at 4,700 feet until you finally hit 230.00 at 4,946 feet.
You can actually see it on the graph in the first post of this thread.
Hey brother, it's actually the only zero point on the graph. If I had started on the wrong one, I would have measured your 0-186 time incorrectly, but it was dead on (0-186 in 14.37 and 0-186.41/0-300 kph in 14.41).
I'm not sure where 4,300 feet came from. If it helps, during acceleration you were at 222 mph at 4,300 feet, 224.8 mph at 4,500 feet, 227.3 mph at 4,700 feet until you finally hit 230.00 at 4,946 feet.
You can actually see it on the graph in the first post of this thread.
#30
Here is the overlay. Red is '08, blue is '09.
At 4,946 feet, you were traveling 2.5 mph faster this year than you were last year. Also, your 100-150 mph time last year was 3.87. This year it was 3.82.
Based on the data, I'm guessing you would have hit 233 mph at the mile point if your sunroof hadn't caved in. Still the fastest street Porsche on planet earth.
At 4,946 feet, you were traveling 2.5 mph faster this year than you were last year. Also, your 100-150 mph time last year was 3.87. This year it was 3.82.
Based on the data, I'm guessing you would have hit 233 mph at the mile point if your sunroof hadn't caved in. Still the fastest street Porsche on planet earth.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 10-19-2009 at 08:08 PM.