996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

60-130 MPH: New performance measurement!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #31  
Old 12-11-2004, 05:21 PM
ben, lj's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: here
Posts: 3,166
Rep Power: 149
ben, lj has a spectacular aura aboutben, lj has a spectacular aura about
Originally posted by Bill S
Yes. You can publish a close-up, labeled "Simulation of a CGT speedo". I can lend you my camera to help you make the simulation.
LOL, that sounds like fun.
 
  #32  
Old 12-13-2004, 12:21 PM
rmrmd1956's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 3rd Planet
Posts: 774
Rep Power: 57
rmrmd1956 is a glorious beacon of lightrmrmd1956 is a glorious beacon of lightrmrmd1956 is a glorious beacon of lightrmrmd1956 is a glorious beacon of lightrmrmd1956 is a glorious beacon of lightrmrmd1956 is a glorious beacon of light
EVO 700 about 7.5sec, measured from a poor video of Bill Paul and Todd driving at a closed course in Malaysia
 
  #33  
Old 12-13-2004, 12:31 PM
collin996tt's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,105
Rep Power: 185
collin996tt is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by Bill S
Going to 180 or 200 is not practical for most people in the US. 60-130 is easy and still removes the starting problems.
we need to designate some hiways in nevada as autobahns here where we can do 200 legally and "safely" for sections at a time.

most cars can do 130 these days before they run out of breath. i think a turbo porsche should be measured higher.
 
  #34  
Old 12-13-2004, 12:50 PM
Bill S's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 444
Rep Power: 40
Bill S has a spectacular aura aboutBill S has a spectacular aura about
Originally posted by rmrmd1956
EVO 700 about 7.5sec, measured from a poor video of Bill Paul and Todd driving at a closed course in Malaysia
Thanks for reporting! Can you post the video for us to enjoy?

Here's a video someone published a while back for an EVO Stage 4. I measure the 60-130 MPH to be the same as my Ruf Turbo R: 8.7 seconds.

http://24.94.0.103/~bills/996tt0_160.avi
 
  #35  
Old 12-13-2004, 01:46 PM
rmrmd1956's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 3rd Planet
Posts: 774
Rep Power: 57
rmrmd1956 is a glorious beacon of lightrmrmd1956 is a glorious beacon of lightrmrmd1956 is a glorious beacon of lightrmrmd1956 is a glorious beacon of lightrmrmd1956 is a glorious beacon of lightrmrmd1956 is a glorious beacon of light
Originally posted by Bill S
Thanks for reporting! Can you post the video for us to enjoy?

Here's a video someone published a while back for an EVO Stage 4. I measure the 60-130 MPH to be the same as my Ruf Turbo R: 8.7 seconds.

http://24.94.0.103/~bills/996tt0_160.avi

Bill, that is my X-car, now owned by the afore mentioned speed demon, Bill Paul, affectionately known by his friends as Buck80
 
  #36  
Old 12-14-2004, 10:07 AM
marc@DEVEK's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 23
marc@DEVEK is infamous around these parts
A GPS would be the best way to measure these times from speed to speed and would remove any speedo error or tire size errors.
 
  #37  
Old 12-14-2004, 11:26 AM
Bill S's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 444
Rep Power: 40
Bill S has a spectacular aura aboutBill S has a spectacular aura about
Can a GPS accurately measure a vehicle accelerating so quickly? If so, which model?
 
  #38  
Old 12-14-2004, 12:07 PM
deputydog95's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 9,539
Rep Power: 502
deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !
sure can. i sometimes take my handheld gps on flights and hold it up to the window. interesting to watch take off speeds and cruising speeds. it's tracked me up to 600mph.
 
  #39  
Old 12-14-2004, 12:47 PM
rmrmd1956's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 3rd Planet
Posts: 774
Rep Power: 57
rmrmd1956 is a glorious beacon of lightrmrmd1956 is a glorious beacon of lightrmrmd1956 is a glorious beacon of lightrmrmd1956 is a glorious beacon of lightrmrmd1956 is a glorious beacon of lightrmrmd1956 is a glorious beacon of light
  #40  
Old 12-14-2004, 12:59 PM
schnellerm3's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Age: 43
Posts: 6,267
Rep Power: 285
schnellerm3 has a brilliant futureschnellerm3 has a brilliant futureschnellerm3 has a brilliant futureschnellerm3 has a brilliant futureschnellerm3 has a brilliant futureschnellerm3 has a brilliant futureschnellerm3 has a brilliant futureschnellerm3 has a brilliant futureschnellerm3 has a brilliant futureschnellerm3 has a brilliant futureschnellerm3 has a brilliant future
Figured I'd chime in - don't you guys have any sort of VAG logging tools? Also, wouldn't it make a lot more sense to do a run in a single gear, to eliminate the shift variable?

For instance, just do a third gear pull from a given RPM - you can extrapolate similar times from 0-100 times given in mags for other car.

I poked around on the web and I don't see any logging tools for P-cars - is there really nothign available? For the S4, we use a 60-90 (4200-6500rpm in 3rd) as a performance metric, and can log one of several blocks in VAG that show time vs. rpm. It's extrememly precise (as long as you aren't going downhill ).
 
  #41  
Old 12-14-2004, 01:33 PM
MKW's Avatar
MKW
MKW is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SF Peninsula and N Lake Tahoe
Posts: 964
Rep Power: 60
MKW is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by GoWide
Figured I'd chime in - don't you guys have any sort of VAG logging tools? Also, wouldn't it make a lot more sense to do a run in a single gear, to eliminate the shift variable?

For instance, just do a third gear pull from a given RPM - you can extrapolate similar times from 0-100 times given in mags for other car.

).
Good suggestion , but I would recommend 4th gear (which goes from about 40 -135 if you start at 2000 rpm )to test power : Set the cruise control at 2000 rpm , then gun it to 6500 rpm . Tests the whole power band ,factors in quickness of turbo spooling , reveals different companies' ECU tuning flat spots , factors in drag caused by wider tires or aftermarket body enhancements - the whole ball of wax , since we drive cars on roads, not dynos .
 

Last edited by MKW; 12-14-2004 at 01:36 PM.
  #42  
Old 12-14-2004, 05:22 PM
Bill S's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 444
Rep Power: 40
Bill S has a spectacular aura aboutBill S has a spectacular aura about
Originally posted by MKW
Good suggestion , but I would recommend 4th gear (which goes from about 40 -135 if you start at 2000 rpm )to test power : Set the cruise control at 2000 rpm , then gun it to 6500 rpm . Tests the whole power band ,factors in quickness of turbo spooling , reveals different companies' ECU tuning flat spots , factors in drag caused by wider tires or aftermarket body enhancements - the whole ball of wax , since we drive cars on roads, not dynos .
The 60-130 MPH test, starting from first at a slow roll, was recommended because you can compare your results with all the magazines. I agree that shift time is a variable, but in reality, this doesn't seem to matter much (i.e., more people can shift very quickly).

Other tests bring in too many variables like throttle response, reaction time, etc. Also, these tests are not easily repeatable. The 60-130 test has shown to be very repeatable and is easy to do. It also tests turbo response between shifts, power curves, gearing, etc.
 
  #43  
Old 12-14-2004, 05:25 PM
Bill S's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 444
Rep Power: 40
Bill S has a spectacular aura aboutBill S has a spectacular aura about
Originally posted by rmrmd1956
Bill,

Try this http://www.race-technology.com/WebPa.../AX22Home.html
That's a great looking new product from those guys. Have you tried it? I have their G-sensor product.

I like speedo/tach videos because they show things that you don't get from these tools, especially when you include sound.
 
  #44  
Old 12-14-2004, 05:50 PM
Dock (Atlanta)'s Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,803
Rep Power: 98
Dock (Atlanta) is just really niceDock (Atlanta) is just really niceDock (Atlanta) is just really niceDock (Atlanta) is just really niceDock (Atlanta) is just really nice
Originally posted by Bill S
Gunning it at the starting speed has too many variables, like turbo lag and reaction time. Doing it like this gets rid of all that. It also allows you to compare your times with what you see in the magazines.
There are variables that have to be taken into consideration with your 60-130 run...the slope of the road, density altitude, and weight (how much gas and the weight of the driver).

The comparison to magazines won't be an exact science (or even close), just as is the case with car to car comparisons that may be posted on this Fourm.
 
  #45  
Old 12-14-2004, 07:47 PM
Bill S's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 444
Rep Power: 40
Bill S has a spectacular aura aboutBill S has a spectacular aura about
Originally posted by Dock (Atlanta)
There are variables that have to be taken into consideration with your 60-130 run...the slope of the road, density altitude, and weight (how much gas and the weight of the driver).

The comparison to magazines won't be an exact science (or even close), just as is the case with car to car comparisons that may be posted on this Fourm.
I agree, but under the most common conditions (e.g., not obese or going downhill or at 7000 ft), these variables are usually negligible. For example, I timed several runs with my 130 lb wife in and out of the car. There was virtually no difference in the 60 to 130 times.

From results people have been posting, the times seem to agree with what we see when we race. A 60 to 130 MPH time under 7 seconds is VERY fast under common conditions. So far, only a Ruf CTR posted such a fast time on another forum.

Bottom line is this test measures the absolute fastest your car can accelerate from 60 to 130.

Let's hear some more numbers, and don't be afraid to post if your times are "slow". We can figure that our later, especially if you provide us with a speedo/tach video with sound.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 60-130 MPH: New performance measurement!



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:53 AM.