Stunning f430 in TDF Blue
#42
12-07-2004, 01:08 PM
Originally posted by Darren
Gregg - I agree way to much space in the wheel well for an F-car
Gregg - I agree way to much space in the wheel well for an F-car
#43
12-07-2004, 01:11 PM
Originally posted by ESK
The front fender is the same as on the current 360 other than the the new shape/size of the headlight. Therefore, the "space" between the wheel well and tire should be the same. Although the rear fender has been reshaped/redesigned, my assumption is the same is true (space between tire and fender). On the 360 CS, the height has been dropped .6" and the resulting look is much better.
The front fender is the same as on the current 360 other than the the new shape/size of the headlight. Therefore, the "space" between the wheel well and tire should be the same. Although the rear fender has been reshaped/redesigned, my assumption is the same is true (space between tire and fender). On the 360 CS, the height has been dropped .6" and the resulting look is much better.
#44
12-07-2004, 02:10 PM
Originally posted by ESK
The front fender is the same as on the current 360 other than the the new shape/size of the headlight. Therefore, the "space" between the wheel well and tire should be the same. Although the rear fender has been reshaped/redesigned, my assumption is the same is true (space between tire and fender). On the 360 CS, the height has been dropped .6" and the resulting look is much better.
The front fender is the same as on the current 360 other than the the new shape/size of the headlight. Therefore, the "space" between the wheel well and tire should be the same. Although the rear fender has been reshaped/redesigned, my assumption is the same is true (space between tire and fender). On the 360 CS, the height has been dropped .6" and the resulting look is much better.
Admittedly I'm a 'nut' in this Dept.
So I'll say again, beautiful car regardless (and maybe Strosek or Ruff could do something w/the fenders
)
