Who is still using a stock MAF at 550+whp?
#63
For everyday driving, it's fine. Many find it too intrusive for aggressive driving.
#64
Not worried. Car ran 9s and mid 4s 60 to 130. This is nothing new.
I made a few different ics These are my latest.
I made a few different ics These are my latest.
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
#65
Your car might not have power to activate PSM much. When I was stock with exh and V-flow, I did not have issue eithier. After upgrade turbo, inj, tune and intake pipes, it interferes and cuts my power often. I turn it off when I am not forget.
#66
the sound of blow off vs....it's drivin me crazy my dvs made a great sound loved it, pue evo piping to the yurbos and it's gone not a wisper any ideas.. the car runs great faster than without the piping
#67
But i talk about efficiensy of the intercoolers from your picture......if they can hold the temp in boost with 10-15 degrees difference from ambient then all is fine, if not, they are simply not that efficient like they need to be
#68
In a perfect world sure. But these are not Secan $25k ics. Sure that's what ur referring to. However I bet those secans would not hold too well on the set up I showed you.
A k16 does not poduce as much heat and volume as a gt35r thus everything changes.
I do know that my 4.5s I make do run 10 degree Celsius hotter then ambient on boost And Thats on a gt30 r setup as in a pic just not a 35r.
Switzer runs 6" ics and he has a few fast cars In Russia.
A k16 does not poduce as much heat and volume as a gt35r thus everything changes.
I do know that my 4.5s I make do run 10 degree Celsius hotter then ambient on boost And Thats on a gt30 r setup as in a pic just not a 35r.
Switzer runs 6" ics and he has a few fast cars In Russia.
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
Last edited by markski@markskituning; 05-09-2010 at 01:34 AM.
#69
In a perfect world sure. But these are not Secan $25k ics. Sure that's what ur referring to. However I bet those secans would not hold too well on the set up I showed you.
A k16 does not poduce as much heat and volume as a gt35r thus everything changes.
I do know that my 4.5s I make do run 10 degree Celsius hotter then ambient on boost And Thats on a gt30 r setup as in a pic just not a 35r.
Switzer runs 6" ics and he has a few fast cars In Russia.
A k16 does not poduce as much heat and volume as a gt35r thus everything changes.
I do know that my 4.5s I make do run 10 degree Celsius hotter then ambient on boost And Thats on a gt30 r setup as in a pic just not a 35r.
Switzer runs 6" ics and he has a few fast cars In Russia.
#70
Kelesha, your hypothesis is very amusing , i can assure you that with out the ducts is does not reduce no efficiencey the larger surface area makes up for that and then some.. LOL also the intake sucking so much air to reduce the efficiency of the intercooler is just funny there is no way at 50 mph for the turbo to suck so much air as to cuase an issue with efficiency ..
also ... there are a few us tuners that can do mafless tunes but one its expensive and two , kind of pointless unless you are going for BIG power !!
and lastly powell has a custome one off tune to his stand alone becuase tony tuned it ,and its the only one he has done.
also ... there are a few us tuners that can do mafless tunes but one its expensive and two , kind of pointless unless you are going for BIG power !!
and lastly powell has a custome one off tune to his stand alone becuase tony tuned it ,and its the only one he has done.
#71
Kelesha, your hypothesis is very amusing , i can assure you that with out the ducts is does not reduce no efficiencey the larger surface area makes up for that and then some.. LOL also the intake sucking so much air to reduce the efficiency of the intercooler is just funny there is no way at 50 mph for the turbo to suck so much air as to cuase an issue with efficiency ..
Now i understand ! But interesting is how in that case is managed VarioCam system, electronic throttle controll and CAN bus communications with all other electronic modules in the car ?
#72
home slice the only time im in greece is in the summer time and i dont tinker with cars , i lay on the beach all day in mykonos .
yes there are few us companys here that can do it, why ? do you think the euro tuners are the only ones capable ? lets not turn this into a us vs euro tuner war cuase you will loose.
mate if it hurt that much cars with that exact setup would not be running 9s , and 60 to 130 in the 4's . again i will not talk in circles since its hard for you to comprehend ,
on the last part you can simply ask tony , powell and justin n .
yes there are few us companys here that can do it, why ? do you think the euro tuners are the only ones capable ? lets not turn this into a us vs euro tuner war cuase you will loose.
mate if it hurt that much cars with that exact setup would not be running 9s , and 60 to 130 in the 4's . again i will not talk in circles since its hard for you to comprehend ,
on the last part you can simply ask tony , powell and justin n .
#73
Ok, fine, but intercooler with that location like in Porsche, without ducting is not efficient at all
#74
how do you know there was no mafless solution till now ? did you look into your crystal ball ? you must be a euro tuner or a troll..... becuase for saying you do not wish to start a tuner war.... sure looks like the opposite .... simply WE HAVE FASTER CARS THEN YOU DO !!!THE END !
STOP DRINKING THE KOOLAID son !! who said anything but intercooler location ?? i was simply implying that the ducting and the intake does hinder performance, and we have the times and numbers to prove it .
STOP DRINKING THE KOOLAID son !! who said anything but intercooler location ?? i was simply implying that the ducting and the intake does hinder performance, and we have the times and numbers to prove it .
#75
Kelesha,
You seem to either be a Euro tuner or someone thats seems to know a lot about IC design and Maf solutions... Do you know how to code via winOLS as well?
I would love to run my car without a maf.... maybe you can help us all... Can you please tell me how to Properly do my ICs? what is in your opinion the best size in IC core for a 1200 hp P car?
BTW, here is a video of my car with poor IC design and a after market maf...
do you have any times for your mafless cars? traps? 60 to 130s?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8DdLl2Rmmk
You seem to either be a Euro tuner or someone thats seems to know a lot about IC design and Maf solutions... Do you know how to code via winOLS as well?
I would love to run my car without a maf.... maybe you can help us all... Can you please tell me how to Properly do my ICs? what is in your opinion the best size in IC core for a 1200 hp P car?
BTW, here is a video of my car with poor IC design and a after market maf...
do you have any times for your mafless cars? traps? 60 to 130s?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8DdLl2Rmmk
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL