Launch Baby Launch! New Launch Control by Vivid Racing
#31
old thread update alert
horsepower and torque are mathematically related via this equation:
HP = (torque x RPM)/5252
and thus, horsepower and torque are always equivalent (ie, cross on a dyno) at ~5252rpm.
http://www.howstuffworks.com/question622.htm
#32
horsepower and torque are mathematically related via this equation:
HP = (torque x RPM)/5252
and thus, horsepower and torque are always equivalent (ie, cross on a dyno) at ~5252rpm.
http://www.howstuffworks.com/question622.htm
HP = (torque x RPM)/5252
and thus, horsepower and torque are always equivalent (ie, cross on a dyno) at ~5252rpm.
http://www.howstuffworks.com/question622.htm
#33
more importantly, has anyone had any experience with this launch control? i ran a search here and on youtube but came up with only this thread and this video. does it work well? improve 1/4 mile times? burn up stock clutches? waste of cash? and what happens after the launch...once you hook up, i'm assuming it goes back to winding out to redline with wide open throttle?
#34
i know it was, and i wasn't trying to answer the question as to why they chose that RPM. just clarifying the dyno point in case you or anyone else reading this didn't know.
more importantly, has anyone had any experience with this launch control? i ran a search here and on youtube but came up with only this thread and this video. does it work well? improve 1/4 mile times? burn up stock clutches? waste of cash? and what happens after the launch...once you hook up, i'm assuming it goes back to winding out to redline with wide open throttle?
more importantly, has anyone had any experience with this launch control? i ran a search here and on youtube but came up with only this thread and this video. does it work well? improve 1/4 mile times? burn up stock clutches? waste of cash? and what happens after the launch...once you hook up, i'm assuming it goes back to winding out to redline with wide open throttle?
#36
HI,What RPM is yours set for??That does make a difference..
#38
Softronic sets it at 5200 rpm to create .2 or .3 worth of boost at launch. I side steped my clutch in the video and as you can tell it was a pretty smooth launch considering it was my first launch in my car at the time
#41
John, my car just can't seem to rev to 42,000 rpm
JK...I know what you mean, I think 4000 would be about perfect. I guess maybe on a stock car 5200 would be ok.
#42
As cool as this tuning option may be, it's not the same as the factory 997.2 launch control. The factory launch control is integrated with the traction control and can feather the throttle based on the amount of traction the computer sees.
It would nice to experiment different launch rpm points... 3,000, 3500, 4,000
You can significantly reduce wheel hop or axel tramp by shock/spring tuning and with stiffer engine mounts.
That said, let's not simply point out the negative side of this "extra". Epl and softronic are the only two tuners so far with this option from what I know
It would nice to experiment different launch rpm points... 3,000, 3500, 4,000
You can significantly reduce wheel hop or axel tramp by shock/spring tuning and with stiffer engine mounts.
That said, let's not simply point out the negative side of this "extra". Epl and softronic are the only two tuners so far with this option from what I know
Last edited by Turbo Fanatic; 04-24-2012 at 06:38 PM.
#43
i'm wondering what would happen if you didn't side-step the clutch. that's clearly the most violent (but effective?) scenerio and most potentially havoc-wreaking to your drive train. what if you used the traction control and let the clutch out smoothly but very quickly? you may burn up clutches a bit faster but maybe save the axles/differentials/etc? or am i crazy?!
#44
well apparently not THAT smooth if you only did it once
i'm wondering what would happen if you didn't side-step the clutch. that's clearly the most violent (but effective?) scenerio and most potentially havoc-wreaking to your drive train. what if you used the traction control and let the clutch out smoothly but very quickly? you may burn up clutches a bit faster but maybe save the axles/differentials/etc? or am i crazy?!
i'm wondering what would happen if you didn't side-step the clutch. that's clearly the most violent (but effective?) scenerio and most potentially havoc-wreaking to your drive train. what if you used the traction control and let the clutch out smoothly but very quickly? you may burn up clutches a bit faster but maybe save the axles/differentials/etc? or am i crazy?!
#45
[QUOTE=Feelgood MD;3525197]well apparently not THAT smooth if you only did it once
i'm wondering what would happen if you didn't side-step the clutch. that's clearly the most violent (but effective?) scenerio and most potentially havoc-wreaking to your drive train. what if you used the traction control and let the clutch out smoothly but very quickly? you may burn up clutches a bit faster but maybe save the axles/differentials/etc? or am i crazy?! [/QUOT
It was a smooth launch considering it was at 5200 rpm's (I also understand this is not the greatest thing for are drive-trains hence reason why I only have done this once.) When I side-step my clutch I let it out in a controlled manner, letting off the clutch completely is way more violent IMO.
i'm wondering what would happen if you didn't side-step the clutch. that's clearly the most violent (but effective?) scenerio and most potentially havoc-wreaking to your drive train. what if you used the traction control and let the clutch out smoothly but very quickly? you may burn up clutches a bit faster but maybe save the axles/differentials/etc? or am i crazy?! [/QUOT
It was a smooth launch considering it was at 5200 rpm's (I also understand this is not the greatest thing for are drive-trains hence reason why I only have done this once.) When I side-step my clutch I let it out in a controlled manner, letting off the clutch completely is way more violent IMO.