996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Volumetric Efficiency Comparo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #31  
Old 01-03-2011 | 03:23 PM
TTdude's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,319
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 245
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by ttboost
Could be some variables.. but .60 should be safe?
Thanks Mike. That number sounds like a good average for these beasts.
 
  #32  
Old 01-03-2011 | 04:10 PM
996ttalot's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 226
From: Surrey, England
Rep Power: 45
996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by TTdude
Not quite following you Ken. What are distorted? Is it something more than just total displacement that you're asking?
What I meant was that an early statement said that for non turbo cars, that max VE would be say 130. So take any non turbo car that has the same performance as say a 996tt or 997tt (standard), then would that same car have a similar VE e.g. 185?
 
  #33  
Old 01-03-2011 | 04:28 PM
996ttalot's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 226
From: Surrey, England
Rep Power: 45
996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by TiALSport
if you've dynoed your car and know the % loss on that dyno you can plot points as well for your MAF readings.

wa = hp (crank)* AFR * BSFC/60
wa = lb/min of actual air flow

1 lb/min air flow = 27.21 kg/hr (MAF in above equation)
Can you explain that in English for me - the formula
 
  #34  
Old 01-03-2011 | 04:30 PM
emadelta86's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,021
From: Italy
Rep Power: 84
emadelta86 has a reputation beyond reputeemadelta86 has a reputation beyond reputeemadelta86 has a reputation beyond reputeemadelta86 has a reputation beyond reputeemadelta86 has a reputation beyond reputeemadelta86 has a reputation beyond reputeemadelta86 has a reputation beyond reputeemadelta86 has a reputation beyond reputeemadelta86 has a reputation beyond reputeemadelta86 has a reputation beyond reputeemadelta86 has a reputation beyond repute
Sorry guys, I have a question on Ve: in A. Graham Bell's forced induction book I found some suggested Ve values for 4 valve engines: 90% through 105% depending on the level of modifications operated on the engine...And he uses these values to calculate the necessary compressor CFM when trying to match engine/turbo.

How can I relate the values you are calculating to those suggested in the book?
 
  #35  
Old 01-03-2011 | 05:09 PM
996ttalot's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 226
From: Surrey, England
Rep Power: 45
996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by emadelta86
Sorry guys, I have a question on Ve: in A. Graham Bell's forced induction book I found some suggested Ve values for 4 valve engines: 90% through 105% depending on the level of modifications operated on the engine...And he uses these values to calculate the necessary compressor CFM when trying to match engine/turbo.

How can I relate the values you are calculating to those suggested in the book?
Try this link. You should have all the values to populate.
 
  #36  
Old 01-04-2011 | 06:33 AM
TiALSport's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 485
From: Michigan
Rep Power: 66
TiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by 996ttalot
Can you explain that in English for me - the formula
wa = actual engine airflow (lb/min)
hp = horsepower at the crank
AFR = air fuel ratio
BSFC = brake specific fuel consumption which you divide by 60 to convert to min. (typical turbo engine is .45 to .60)
 
  #37  
Old 01-04-2011 | 06:35 AM
TiALSport's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 485
From: Michigan
Rep Power: 66
TiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond reputeTiALSport has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by TTdude
Cool, more equations. Thanks for posting. What values would you estimate for BSFC for 600-900 bHP P-turbo?
depends on the fuel used, but figure an aggressive tune and race fuel .45 to .50
 
  #38  
Old 01-04-2011 | 06:43 AM
Yazz911TT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 189
From: Essex, UK
Rep Power: 21
Yazz911TT is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by TTdude
Mike was kind enough to send me a datalog of one his runs. So I compared his VEs (996t, A28s) to mine (997.1t, upgraded vtgs). Mike ran a very fast 5.5s 60-130 (4th gear, 0 shift) and my set-up did a 6.9 (4th, gear, 0 shift). While there is nothing better than real-world data, VEs are interesting in that engine output can be compared without secondary factors like car weight, tailwind, % decline, etc... There is a pretty dramatic difference in VEs as would be expected but look at the low-mid range and area under the curve. Very impressive. For reference, a completely stock 997.1t VE will max out around 185.

Thanks again Mike for sharing your data with me. Happy New Year Bro!



Why cant i see the graph!
 
  #39  
Old 01-04-2011 | 08:46 AM
The Bogg's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,666
From: GTA, Ontario, Canada
Rep Power: 235
The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by ttdude
i think he's holding out until you break down and get those alpha's... Hilarious
lol!
 
  #40  
Old 01-04-2011 | 10:05 AM
TTdude's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,319
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 245
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by emadelta86
Sorry guys, I have a question on Ve: in A. Graham Bell's forced induction book I found some suggested Ve values for 4 valve engines: 90% through 105% depending on the level of modifications operated on the engine...And he uses these values to calculate the necessary compressor CFM when trying to match engine/turbo.

How can I relate the values you are calculating to those suggested in the book?
Hi, I think what you're asking is described nicely on the Garret turbo site with examples. Click here. As far as my understanding goes, you can't really relate the VEs calculated here with what you are asking. Basically, you have to match the turbo with what your motor can flow. Obviously, if you slap on a big honking turbo and your motor can't flow enough air to spin the turbine adequately, it will do you no good. So those equations are meant to be used to put you in the right ballpark in choosing a turbo if you were starting from scratch. Fortunately, we have a ton of real-world data to rely on.

After you add the turbo's, the VEs obviously go up. We're are measuring VEs for different set-ups, post-mod. The goal, of course, is to maximize VEs across the rpm power range. You could measure VEs after installing different supporting mods like ICs to see which might be more effective under different conditions. Just because an IC may be controlling IATs better at X hp does not mean that it will be suitable at higher hp due to flow restrictions. VEs will tell you this.
 
  #41  
Old 01-04-2011 | 10:17 AM
TTdude's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,319
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 245
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Yazz911TT
Why cant i see the graph!
Sorry, dunno. Try a different computer? Attached is a PDF of that graph. Hope that helps.
 
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
VE MBailey vs TTdude.pdf (103.6 KB, 96 views)
  #42  
Old 01-04-2011 | 10:36 AM
Neil Switzer's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,387
From: Oberlin, NE Ohio
Rep Power: 0
Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !
This is exactly why we stopped using the modded VTG's after 750hp, we can make "better" power running the custom A28's...
 
  #43  
Old 01-04-2011 | 11:00 AM
ttboost's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,453
From: CT
Rep Power: 438
ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Neil Switzer
This is exactly why we stopped using the modded VTG's after 750hp, we can make "better" power running the custom A28's...

Have you guys gotten over 700whp out of VTG's?
 
  #44  
Old 01-04-2011 | 11:03 AM
TTdude's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,319
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 245
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Neil Switzer
This is exactly why we stopped using the modded VTG's after 750hp, we can make "better" power running the custom A28's...
From the looks of it, it seems that you get better power even well below 750--lol.
 
  #45  
Old 01-04-2011 | 11:53 AM
Frank ( Sunnyside )'s Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,499
From: Scotland
Rep Power: 97
Frank ( Sunnyside ) has a reputation beyond reputeFrank ( Sunnyside ) has a reputation beyond reputeFrank ( Sunnyside ) has a reputation beyond reputeFrank ( Sunnyside ) has a reputation beyond reputeFrank ( Sunnyside ) has a reputation beyond reputeFrank ( Sunnyside ) has a reputation beyond reputeFrank ( Sunnyside ) has a reputation beyond reputeFrank ( Sunnyside ) has a reputation beyond reputeFrank ( Sunnyside ) has a reputation beyond reputeFrank ( Sunnyside ) has a reputation beyond reputeFrank ( Sunnyside ) has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by TiALSport
if you've dynoed your car and know the % loss on that dyno you can plot points as well for your MAF readings.

wa = hp (crank)* AFR * BSFC/60
wa = lb/min of actual air flow

1 lb/min air flow = 27.21 kg/hr (MAF in above equation)
How do you work out BSFC

Given that


Where:
r is the fuel consumption rate in grams per second (g·s-1) P is the power produced in watts where P = τω How do you know what the fuel consumption of your engine is ie r

Frank
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Volumetric Efficiency Comparo



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:32 AM.