Beautiful day for some HDR pics of my "aesthetically" stock 996
#1
Beautiful day for some HDR pics of my "aesthetically" stock 996
Went out and took some pics this morning since it's beautiful weather today. Then messed around with Photomatix. I don't usually do HDR, and I'm definitely no pro at photography, though I'd like to be lol, and this is w/ my mediocre Canon XSi w/ the stock 18-55 lens. Anyway, enjoy.
edit: the car is dirty as hell lol, I just didn't have the time to clean it yet. Part of the reason I went with HDR because it hides dirt well lol.
edit: the car is dirty as hell lol, I just didn't have the time to clean it yet. Part of the reason I went with HDR because it hides dirt well lol.
#3
Lookin' good. Nothing wrong with a dirty car. Just a good sign that it's being used properly!
Glad I'm not the only one that prefers the rear seats down.
Send some more once you have a chance to get it cleaned up.
Have a great summer!!
Glad I'm not the only one that prefers the rear seats down.
Send some more once you have a chance to get it cleaned up.
Have a great summer!!
#5
Thanks guys, yea I've put about 3k miles on it since I've had it with me in 3 months. I can't resist driving it lol. About to do my oil change, have all the parts ordered, just waiting on them. Hopefully I can get the turbo up on the rhino ramps (really really hoping I can back it up w/ my lowered PSS9s lol)
and daytrip, I'll look into it, honestly was just messing around with the sliders lol so I don't even know where the topaz adjust boost is that you are referring to lol. I have to start reading up on how to use photomatix.
and daytrip, I'll look into it, honestly was just messing around with the sliders lol so I don't even know where the topaz adjust boost is that you are referring to lol. I have to start reading up on how to use photomatix.
Last edited by dragonman4; 06-14-2011 at 02:49 PM.
#6
dragonman4, you were using topaz adjust, right? With both photomatix and topaz adjust when you're starting out, i think it's best to do a little less than you think is good. It's weird. I go back and look at my older HDR photos and think i way overdid it. Here's a pic of my dearly departed 996 NA. I gotta take the new (old) turbo out for a photo shoot...
#7
dragonman4, you were using topaz adjust, right? With both photomatix and topaz adjust when you're starting out, i think it's best to do a little less than you think is good. It's weird. I go back and look at my older HDR photos and think i way overdid it. Here's a pic of my dearly departed 996 NA. I gotta take the new (old) turbo out for a photo shoot...
edit: also, is that pic of your carrera an HDR pic? It looks to me like it's just a really good pic taken with a good lens. I definitely have an untrained eye when it comes to photoediting.
Trending Topics
#8
Gotcha... Topaz Adjust is a tone mapping program (it will only deal with 16-bit color photos). Photomatix does both tone mapping and HDR... I used to do the HDR conversions (basically 3-5 photos to a 32-bit color image) in photomatix, tone map it and then over to Topaz for sharpening and a bit a bit of color fine tuning. Since Photoshop CS5 came out, it's unbelievably good at creating HDRs, so i've switched to using that and doing some tone mapping in Photomatix and Topaz.
You'll love the 5Dmk2. I had a mk1, but have since moved to a Nikon D700. Any full frame DSLR is gonna be that cat's meow.
EDIT: The pic is indeed an HDR taken with a simple $300 50mm f1.4 lens. If you look at the glow off the windshield and the detail in the shadows you can see it's an HDR. IMHO (this is only my preference/taste) the best HDR photos are ones where you cant tell they're HDRs.
You'll love the 5Dmk2. I had a mk1, but have since moved to a Nikon D700. Any full frame DSLR is gonna be that cat's meow.
EDIT: The pic is indeed an HDR taken with a simple $300 50mm f1.4 lens. If you look at the glow off the windshield and the detail in the shadows you can see it's an HDR. IMHO (this is only my preference/taste) the best HDR photos are ones where you cant tell they're HDRs.
Last edited by daytrip00; 06-14-2011 at 02:58 PM.
#9
OH, one last thing. I do think the D700 has the slight edge at making HDRs (if you're still in the market). It will take up to 7 bracketed photos (the 5D mk2 will take 3). You never need to go past 5 (to quote Trey from StuckInCustoms, "unless you're trying to photograph got him/herself"), but I definitely think that 5 photos make better hdrs than just 3.
#10
Gotcha... Topaz Adjust is a tone mapping program (it will only deal with 16-bit color photos). Photomatix does both tone mapping and HDR... I used to do the HDR conversions (basically 3-5 photos to a 32-bit color image) in photomatix, tone map it and then over to Topaz for sharpening and a bit a bit of color fine tuning. Since Photoshop CS5 came out, it's unbelievably good at creating HDRs, so i've switched to using that and doing some tone mapping in Photomatix and Topaz.
You'll love the 5Dmk2. I had a mk1, but have since moved to a Nikon D700. Any full frame DSLR is gonna be that cat's meow.
EDIT: The pic is indeed an HDR taken with a simple $300 50mm f1.4 lens. If you look at the glow off the windshield and the detail in the shadows you can see it's an HDR. IMHO (this is only my preference/taste) the best HDR photos are ones where you cant tell they're HDRs.
You'll love the 5Dmk2. I had a mk1, but have since moved to a Nikon D700. Any full frame DSLR is gonna be that cat's meow.
EDIT: The pic is indeed an HDR taken with a simple $300 50mm f1.4 lens. If you look at the glow off the windshield and the detail in the shadows you can see it's an HDR. IMHO (this is only my preference/taste) the best HDR photos are ones where you cant tell they're HDRs.