Product Review: IPD Turbo and Header BLANKETS!
#32
Update: Pump file comparison
As promised, I want to provide additional and ongoing data and impressions on using these blankets.
I have a twin eprom setup from EVOMS. I have a race file and a 93 octane pump file. I have been using the race file thus far for best performance. However, I realize that many of you don't run on race fuel but still may be curious about this mod for your car.
Again, I will use the PBox as the measuring stick. The red speed line and the green g line are the blanketed car and the blue speed line and the black g line are the non-blanketed car.
As you can see by the chart and graph the blanketed car is approx 2.5% faster in a fourth gear 60-130 (7.21s vs. 7.39) These runs were done at essentially identical locations and conditions. The spool advantage is present but is much less than in the race gas runs. The blanketed car just pulls away during the entire run but especially at higher rpms (see enlarged graph).
I have a twin eprom setup from EVOMS. I have a race file and a 93 octane pump file. I have been using the race file thus far for best performance. However, I realize that many of you don't run on race fuel but still may be curious about this mod for your car.
Again, I will use the PBox as the measuring stick. The red speed line and the green g line are the blanketed car and the blue speed line and the black g line are the non-blanketed car.
As you can see by the chart and graph the blanketed car is approx 2.5% faster in a fourth gear 60-130 (7.21s vs. 7.39) These runs were done at essentially identical locations and conditions. The spool advantage is present but is much less than in the race gas runs. The blanketed car just pulls away during the entire run but especially at higher rpms (see enlarged graph).
#34
For those of you that are more familiar with third gear pulls. Here are some 60-108 mph pulls with the pump file and blankets vs. no blankets similar to above.
As you can see the blankets pulled consistently harder giving a 60-100 in 3.12s compared to 3.19s. It also continues to out pull it clear to the cut off at 7000 rpm (~108-109 mph).
As you can see the blankets pulled consistently harder giving a 60-100 in 3.12s compared to 3.19s. It also continues to out pull it clear to the cut off at 7000 rpm (~108-109 mph).
#36
One last addition for tonight.
Last night it was slightly cooler (ie 85F vs 90-95 remember drought and wildfires here). I went out with the pump file because I did not have any race fuel. The car ran a 6.88s 60-130 in warm temps on 93 oct!! Some may not be impressed but for these smallish snails in unfavorable conditions and uphill, that was amazing on pump. Dave conjectured that the blankets may give an increasing advantage as the temps drop. Perhaps he is right. Stay tuned...
Last night it was slightly cooler (ie 85F vs 90-95 remember drought and wildfires here). I went out with the pump file because I did not have any race fuel. The car ran a 6.88s 60-130 in warm temps on 93 oct!! Some may not be impressed but for these smallish snails in unfavorable conditions and uphill, that was amazing on pump. Dave conjectured that the blankets may give an increasing advantage as the temps drop. Perhaps he is right. Stay tuned...
#38
This has got to be one of the most interesting and innovative solutions I've seen in a while!
Definitely subscribed!
That said, I have to say, with respect to 997tt's - I have just gone through quite an expensive exercise repairing my VTG's. They are delicate pieces of machinery, subjected to extreme forces and temperatures - so I'd be very weary as to what the long term effects of such a "heat shield/blanket" would be.
Definitely subscribed!
That said, I have to say, with respect to 997tt's - I have just gone through quite an expensive exercise repairing my VTG's. They are delicate pieces of machinery, subjected to extreme forces and temperatures - so I'd be very weary as to what the long term effects of such a "heat shield/blanket" would be.
#40
Well this is interesting. Going through EVOMS catalog, here is what they say about their headers:
"The larger diameter primary tubes increase exhaust volume to the turbos while reducing exhaust gas temperatures (EGT's) on high power applications. Power gains are increased up to 30+ HP and 30+ Ft. TQ, depending on the application and EGT's are lowered by 50 degrees C."
They specifically talk about reducing temperatures (among other things like size/diameters) as being a benefit.
"The larger diameter primary tubes increase exhaust volume to the turbos while reducing exhaust gas temperatures (EGT's) on high power applications. Power gains are increased up to 30+ HP and 30+ Ft. TQ, depending on the application and EGT's are lowered by 50 degrees C."
They specifically talk about reducing temperatures (among other things like size/diameters) as being a benefit.
Last edited by pureporsche; 09-07-2011 at 08:54 AM.
#42
is that sustainable EGT? those are good numbers, x<1200F is safe ... well done Mike
#45
I would be very interested in these but am concerned about the long term effect on the turbo's. I am looking for a solution to decrease the turbo lag. Increase in power is not as important as less lag. I hope this is a good and safe solution.