Mike thanks for the data.

So 100% ms 109 would do a little better than 93oct + 100% meth?

 

IMO, yes, but to me, it wasn't worth the extra money...Methanol is cheap and in the end, clean fuel is clean fuel. Methanol can only make up so much.
If I was made of money like you, I would have 55gal drums of MS109 in my new garge 24/7...

 

I tested metharol injection
the only problem you have to run the A/F on gas or racing gas leaner. make it up on meth for it to make more power. same results on other cars - subarus,mitsubishi,supras if you don't have direct port injection on the meth don't use it. IT'S DANGEROUS you can lean out cylinder. so run ms109 penny saved dolla wasted

 

I am always worried that there might be a malfunction w/ the meth system...I know they can be made pretty reliable, but still.

I loaded up my car w/ Sunoco 104 (same specific gravity as the C16 I was tuned for....I just run a bit less boost) but the traffic is so bad where I am (3 years ago it was non-existent) that I ended up wasting 5 gallons just trying to get some pulls in.

Anther reason why I am never going to upgrade beyond the 800 rwhp my car makes on C16, really no where to use it anymore.

 

Lets not underestimate the importance of making more power further down the rpm range...that is hugely important, possibly more so than max hp.

My car is making lots of power at 3800 rpm. I am making good power for more than 3k rpms. Blow through system, TB, ICs all help. I beat a car that made 755 and did 206 at the Tx Mile with that set up.

Since I swapped out my Europipe (just loved the sound....but it was the last restriction point on my car) my car spools up even faster.

I love how Chump Tech claims that Todd and I are full of it. Todd is smart enough not to even waste his time on his foolishness, especially since he is busy actually out running 212 at the Tx Mile and sub 5 60-130s. Gee, he really must not understand flow dynamics I think I will join him in ignoring noobs who have really done nothing with their cars. That is more for Chumpy than for bad 107, who I believe is at least building something.

And seriously, now you guys want to argue with Chris He has more knowledge in his pinkie finger and has done more with these cars in the last week than you will in the next 10 years.

 

This.

Hey Chris....remember when you came over to my house for dinner? Man that has to be at least 5 years ago. Could we have imagined then that you would be running north of 1k hp back then? We thought 550 was a big deal.

 

I made 669 on stock y pipe/TB/intake/Evo ICs on the same turbos I now have. Full blow through, larger injectors and upgrading the above added 130 rwhp.

 

I'm not arguing with Chris about anything as he nor anyone else has offered a factual rebuttle to turbo outlet size question. I have simply stated facts on flow and diameter. Do you have something to offer here other than insults and hearsay??

 

Yes....if you read my post you will see that I picked up 130 rwhp, and a much fatter powerband when I increased tubing size of my intake, TB, and Y pipe.

How much more plainly can it be stated?

 

Which post r u referring to? I don't see it.

 

Sean lets take your car to Drivers Source & dyno it while you have 104 in it I'm interested to see it dyno. I'm not saying you are lying just curious to see what it can do since it has not been dynoed in quite a while.

 

I can only run 1.5 bars on 104....on C16 I can go 1.7. True, I would be interested in what it would dyno. Akram estimated about 800 rwhp.

 

What Europipe were you running and what exhaust did you switch to?

 

Loud w/ cat delete.

Went to a full 3 inch BBI.

 

Sean, can you please explain your increase in horsepower. I am confused, it seems you changed the injectors and possibly the intercoolers to get the 130 rwhp.

Thanks