Quattroroute Murci vs CGT vs Enzo
#16
Oh yea... This article claims the CGT gets 11.75sec 1/4mile...
tom91722 got 11.75sec@126mph 1/4mile with his GT2, with only an EVO Airbox and GIAC/Sharkey/EVO flash (whatever)...
So Porsche's top model, the Carrera GT, gets the same 1/4mile as a GT2 with a couple of mods?? That's funny... Someone needs to learn how to drive.
Check out the rest of the details:
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...threadid=28908
tom91722 got 11.75sec@126mph 1/4mile with his GT2, with only an EVO Airbox and GIAC/Sharkey/EVO flash (whatever)...
So Porsche's top model, the Carrera GT, gets the same 1/4mile as a GT2 with a couple of mods?? That's funny... Someone needs to learn how to drive.
Check out the rest of the details:
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...threadid=28908
#17
Originally posted by NAPO
. Car and driver ]
. Car and driver ]
A very well known motoring journalist said this to me today infact:
"You dont believe everything you read in car magazines?"
#19
Originally posted by NAPO
Sorry to say but... Those times are BS dude, someone needs to learn how to drive... CGT does 0-100 in 4.04sec?? Yeaaaa, riiiight.
Porsche is super modest and they give it 3.9sec 0-60.
Sorry to say but... Those times are BS dude, someone needs to learn how to drive... CGT does 0-100 in 4.04sec?? Yeaaaa, riiiight.
Porsche is super modest and they give it 3.9sec 0-60.
Even though I agree these times are BS they are listed in KPH not MPH.
#20
Does the CGT need to shift at 60mph? Because 100kmh is 62.5 mph, so maybe thats the difference also. All magazines will not get the same results, different cars, differnt days, different conditions. The Murci has also been clocked faster 0-60 in 3.5 sec by Motor Trend, and these guys got a lower mph than anyone in the 1/4.
#21
Originally posted by AdamT
enough said.
A very well known motoring journalist said this to me today infact:
"You dont believe everything you read in car magazines?"
enough said.
A very well known motoring journalist said this to me today infact:
"You dont believe everything you read in car magazines?"
Last edited by Doug H; 06-28-2005 at 04:21 PM.
#22
Originally posted by AdamT
enough said.
A very well known motoring journalist said this to me today infact:
"You dont believe everything you read in car magazines?"
enough said.
A very well known motoring journalist said this to me today infact:
"You dont believe everything you read in car magazines?"
#23
Originally posted by NAPO
I do know what you are saying and I do agree about some car magazines... But these times are obviously very high... We are talking about the top supercars of today... There is no way that a slightly modded GT2 can get the same times as Porsche's top model/ supercar... Oh and I didn't know a Murci is significantly faster than a CGT to 62.5mph?? There would be something wrong in with that situation... Don't you agree??
I do know what you are saying and I do agree about some car magazines... But these times are obviously very high... We are talking about the top supercars of today... There is no way that a slightly modded GT2 can get the same times as Porsche's top model/ supercar... Oh and I didn't know a Murci is significantly faster than a CGT to 62.5mph?? There would be something wrong in with that situation... Don't you agree??
#25
Originally posted by NAPO
Sorry to say, but you are obviously crazy... Are you seriously trying to say that a Murci can out accelerate a CGT??
Sorry to say, but you are obviously crazy... Are you seriously trying to say that a Murci can out accelerate a CGT??
#26
Originally posted by allanlambo
Im saying you obviously dont have too much experience with cars. Im saying a Cgt will have a VERY difficult time off the line against a well launched Murci. The CGT is certainly faster, but dead stop, 0-100mph, very tough time.
Im saying you obviously dont have too much experience with cars. Im saying a Cgt will have a VERY difficult time off the line against a well launched Murci. The CGT is certainly faster, but dead stop, 0-100mph, very tough time.
#27
He's not bashing the CGT, but off the line without a good driver the Murcielago will most likely win, because of the aid of all wheel drive. The Murcielago is definetly a bargan in comparison with the CGT and Enzo. I would go with an Enzo first and probley a Murcielago over a CGT, Im just not 100% fond of the CGT looks and its very raw handling.
#28
Originally posted by StephenTi
Has anyone seen or can post dyno graphs from any of these 3 cars?
Has anyone seen or can post dyno graphs from any of these 3 cars?
This data is from August of last year(Not done @ Devek).
.97 SAE correction factor
Run 1: 535.9 hp @ 8500 rpm & 377.1 ft-lbs @ 6000 rpm
Run 2: 529.2 hp @ 8250 rpm & 384.2 ft-lbs @ 6000 rpm
Car had roughly 4000 miles.
Greg A
#29
Originally posted by NAPO
You obviously don't have much experience with cars. Go to a Lambo forum or something... Trying to mash on the CGT like that. You can't compare a Murci to a CGT... 0-100mph a CGT will eat a Murci alive! Look at the 0-200kph times you posted (about 0-124mph)... The Murci got 12.84sec. and the CGT got 11.44sec. Pretty big difference I think.
You obviously don't have much experience with cars. Go to a Lambo forum or something... Trying to mash on the CGT like that. You can't compare a Murci to a CGT... 0-100mph a CGT will eat a Murci alive! Look at the 0-200kph times you posted (about 0-124mph)... The Murci got 12.84sec. and the CGT got 11.44sec. Pretty big difference I think.
#30
Stephen,
I have seen and have a copy of the runs from which I posted info on Rennlist. See rmrmd1956's post above mine.
I am not going to post these copies here as they do not belong to me and I don't have the owner's permission.
What is it you would like to know?
Greg A
I have seen and have a copy of the runs from which I posted info on Rennlist. See rmrmd1956's post above mine.
I am not going to post these copies here as they do not belong to me and I don't have the owner's permission.
What is it you would like to know?
Greg A