996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Sellers Regret?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #31  
Old 02-06-2014 | 08:06 PM
frankster's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 289
From: Houston
Rep Power: 33
frankster is a name known to allfrankster is a name known to allfrankster is a name known to allfrankster is a name known to allfrankster is a name known to allfrankster is a name known to all
Originally Posted by '02996ttx50
none of what you just said supports the misguided notion that the limitation of porsche's liabilities to ten years stemming from case you just cited suggests that porsche believes their cars should only be in service for ten years and no longer? or that after that date they somehow no longer exist as operable vehicles. man, what kind of twisted sh*t are you on about? then slagging people here who did nothing other than ask for your source? then on top, calling them lazy whiny, and wtf man. you just ain''t right.

and no, i won't look it up either.
Yeah! Don't let ignorance get in the way of your mouth!
 
  #32  
Old 02-06-2014 | 08:18 PM
'02996ttx50's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 7,978
From: la
Rep Power: 603
'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !
aww, i get it. it's a troll thing. ya almost had me for a sec lol. carry on
 
  #33  
Old 02-06-2014 | 11:07 PM
machinegunt's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 913
From: Boise, Idaho
Rep Power: 97
machinegunt Is a GOD !machinegunt Is a GOD !machinegunt Is a GOD !machinegunt Is a GOD !machinegunt Is a GOD !machinegunt Is a GOD !machinegunt Is a GOD !machinegunt Is a GOD !machinegunt Is a GOD !machinegunt Is a GOD !machinegunt Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by '02996ttx50
aww, i get it. it's a troll thing. ya almost had me for a sec lol. carry on
Exactly......Don't feed the trolls!! Lol!
 
  #34  
Old 02-07-2014 | 11:07 AM
magoochi's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 238
From: Boston
Rep Power: 42
magoochi has a brilliant futuremagoochi has a brilliant futuremagoochi has a brilliant futuremagoochi has a brilliant futuremagoochi has a brilliant futuremagoochi has a brilliant futuremagoochi has a brilliant futuremagoochi has a brilliant futuremagoochi has a brilliant futuremagoochi has a brilliant futuremagoochi has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by frankster
I don't understand this whole 'depreciation thing'. You're starting with a car that has its newest offering being 10 yrs old. In the lawsuit involving the non-turbo cars, Porsche admitted to their cars having a 'useable life' of ten years. So, you are effectively starting with a car that is already past it's 'useable life'. Therefore, it's proper value is zero.

Therefore, you have a car whose value based on mileage is effectively a 'non-issue'. So, don't worry about putting miles on your car - DRIVE IT!!!


You obviously didn't read the first post. This about NOT DRIVING IT ENOUGH. Nothing more. It's not a money thing.
 
  #35  
Old 02-07-2014 | 03:37 PM
RS4Me's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 35
From: Dallas TX
Rep Power: 16
RS4Me is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by magoochi
You obviously didn't read the first post. This about NOT DRIVING IT ENOUGH. Nothing more. It's not a money thing.

When I bought my business partner out part of the buy out was my RS4 which I bought new. I had the best of both worlds with these two cars in my opinion. I kept telling myself, I have the Porsche which I drive more than the RS4 so I don't think I will miss it. What a mistake. I look at Autotrader every week hoping it will be for sale. As with yourself it was not a money issue. You have a bond with this car. Keep it.
Tim941NYC, thank god I didn't have a mouthful of coffee when I read your post.

frankster, please don't give Texas a black eye.
 
  #36  
Old 02-07-2014 | 04:23 PM
teflon_jones's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,904
From: 8000' up in the Rockies
Rep Power: 147
teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !
1) Personal attacks are not permitted on this forum.
2) I could search for the information, but that would be pointless since I was asking YOU for YOUR source for this information, and I am not a mind reader.
3) I live on top of many, many rocks, but not under any.

Originally Posted by leftlane
Did you read the article yourself? The only time 10 years come into play was for the in-service for cars to be covered under the IMS settlement. Nowhere does Porsche state that the useful life of its cars is 10 years - nowhere. They only used that timeframe to limit the liability for the settlement.

Maybe you should apologize to Teflon for your misinterpretation of the very article you cited.
Thank you. Exactly on point. His "facts" are entirely based on a misinterpretation of the REAL facts.

Originally Posted by '02996ttx50
that and possibly removing the suggestion from his sig line that posits he relies upon "Just the facts, ma'am" when asserting his "NEVER" humble opinions
+1 I still see ZERO facts Porsche ever said anything to indicate their cars have a 10 year lifespan.

Originally Posted by frankster
No. I give grief to three types of people: 1) The Lazy, 2) The Whiney, and 3) Defenders of Lazy, Whiney people.

Teflon was lazy in his unwillingness to look it up for himself.
Secondly, he whined about it by claiming he had never heard about the case.
In spite of his ignorance that he was too lazy to alleve. I said what I said on purpose with a purpose. Therefore, no apology will be forthcoming.
As stated above (again) since you apparently have trouble interpreting things:
1) NO PERSONAL ATTACKS ARE ALLOWED ON THE FORUM.
2) I asked for YOUR source. How am I supposed to know what you're basing your "facts" on? A simple link to the article would have been enough, though this is only one source, and I've never heard of iron-clad facts coming from only one source (especially one that only includes limited snippets of information which could easily be taken out of context).
3) How is saying you aren't familiar with something whining? Please explain to me to me the full facts of the Ford vs International legal case regarding diesel engines without looking anything up. (don't bother, I know you can't - nobody knows everything, and asking about it isn't whining, it's called asking a question... )

Originally Posted by frankster
That sets Porsche up for protection against future liabilities for both manufacturing defects as well as parts supply. Which also protects Porsche from future liability of parts manufactured by aftermarket suppliers for cars older than ten years. This nullifies your statement as to any 'insignificance' of their words. In fact, it will provide important legal precedent for ALL automotive manufacurers selling cars in the U.S. for some time to come!
1) Please cite precedent for this.
2) What law school did you attend? Please cite this as well as any other legal experience and education you have that makes this anything other than entirely unsupported opinion.

Originally Posted by frankster
As to 'mis-interpreting'; hardly. That 'ten year service life' statement will have both a direct and immediate effect on the re-sale price of all Porsches tens years or older. Dealers will immediately discount Porsches of that age to an even lower trade-in value. Go ask a Carmax rep the impact a legal statement like that will have on the value they place on ten-yr-old Porsches! Or better yet, go ask a Porsche dealer what impact that statement will have on your trade-in value on a new Porsche. I guarantee you will NOT like his answer!
1) Please cite your expertise that allows you to state this as fact.
2) "Ask a Carmax rep the impact a legal statement <yada yada>" - Are you serious? Ask a car salesman, notoriously the people with the LEAST knowledge about the car industry, about not only a highly complex economics/supply & demand issue, but also about the legal aspects of things like this?

Keep in mind I have an economics degree from a top 25 school and am a highly successful professional who regularly analyzes things like this for Fortune 500 companies who trust MY opinion as FACT and make multi-billion dollar decisions on it... If you've ever heard of a little company called IHS who happens to have the leading automotive industry experts in the entire world (and is THE source for info like this for so many small, unknown, and untrusted organizations like NPR, CNN, CNBC, and basically every single other US and many international news outlets, never mind every single major and most minor auto makers in the world), well that's where I worked for 6 years including analysis of the auto industry.

Originally Posted by frankster
You are actually the one who is mis-interpreting the statement. You short-sightedness on this issue leaves you wanting . . .
Given every single other person on this forum full of educated, smart and intuitive people disagrees with you, maybe you want to consider which of these things is bigger: your knowledge or ego.
 
  #37  
Old 02-07-2014 | 04:50 PM
GT3 Chuck's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 14,915
From: California
Rep Power: 1002
GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !
While you are correct that we don't permit personal attacks we certainly allow a difference of opinion...we would just like it expressed with respect....none of this has anything to do with the original topic...thread closed
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dr bit
991
13
10-12-2015 09:05 AM
drcollie
991
5
10-02-2015 09:34 PM
awdbiturbo1
996 Turbo / GT2
9
09-30-2015 02:01 PM
carlosC4S
Cayenne 958
1
09-26-2015 08:58 AM
FUTURESTAR
Automobiles For Sale
7
09-23-2015 05:42 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Sellers Regret?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:28 AM.