996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

996 X50 vs. Gallardo..Which is quicker??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #61  
Old 11-02-2005, 10:37 PM
Bill S's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 444
Rep Power: 40
Bill S has a spectacular aura aboutBill S has a spectacular aura about
Originally posted by allanlambo
Honestly, im terrible at math, but do yourself a favor, imagine yourself standing at the end of a 150mph run way. Now imagine one car going buy at 150mph and you instantly click your stop watch and wait to 2 seconds until the next car passes. If you think only 4 car lengths will seperate the 2, you are delerious.

Also factor into your math, that when when the Gallardo its 150mph marker, the 360 is going no where near that same speed.

Talking with some drag racers, they said the general rule was figure just in the 1/4 every tenth of a second= 2 car lengths.
Allan, the math is much better than trying to imagine something that doesn't make sense (i.e., a car reaching a SPEED of 150 MPH 2 seconds before another does not mean it's 2 seconds DISTANT from the other). Doesn't it sound strange to you that two cars which are perfectly even at 118/115 MPH are now 16 cars apart only 10 seconds later? Use the math. It will save yourself a headache.
 
  #62  
Old 11-02-2005, 11:25 PM
allanlambo's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Maui
Age: 54
Posts: 1,768
Rep Power: 0
allanlambo is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by Bill S
Allan, the math is much better than trying to imagine something that doesn't make sense (i.e., a car reaching a SPEED of 150 MPH 2 seconds before another does not mean it's 2 seconds DISTANT from the other). Doesn't it sound strange to you that two cars which are perfectly even at 118/115 MPH are now 16 cars apart only 10 seconds later? Use the math. It will save yourself a headache.
10 seconds is an eternity. No ifs ands or butss, the Gallardo will be substantially farther ahead than 4 car lengths.
 
  #63  
Old 11-03-2005, 02:56 AM
StephenTi's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: L.A.
Posts: 1,935
Rep Power: 99
StephenTi is infamous around these parts
Actually, general rule is ~1 car lengths per .1 sec...

Assuming a car is 15 ft long, at one second, that is 10 car lengths, or 160ft. 160ft/sec is ~102mph.

So, if you're standing at the end of the drag strip when one car crosses at 102mph, keeping velocity constant for both cars, in 1 second, TEN car lengths will have gone by before the 2nd car passes.
 
  #64  
Old 11-03-2005, 03:08 AM
StephenTi's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: L.A.
Posts: 1,935
Rep Power: 99
StephenTi is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by Bill S
Allan, the math is much better than trying to imagine something that doesn't make sense (i.e., a car reaching a SPEED of 150 MPH 2 seconds before another does not mean it's 2 seconds DISTANT from the other). Doesn't it sound strange to you that two cars which are perfectly even at 118/115 MPH are now 16 cars apart only 10 seconds later? Use the math. It will save yourself a headache.
You are correct... reaching a velocity 2 sec before another does not mean it's 2 sec of distance. You're constant is mph, and Allanlambo is arguing something completely unrelated; that is the 2 second gap in arriving at distance x.
 
  #65  
Old 11-03-2005, 10:16 AM
allanlambo's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Maui
Age: 54
Posts: 1,768
Rep Power: 0
allanlambo is infamous around these parts
Whatever it may be, absolutley no way is the CS only for 4 cars behind at 150 mph with a 2 second gap.
 
  #66  
Old 11-03-2005, 11:42 AM
StephenTi's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: L.A.
Posts: 1,935
Rep Power: 99
StephenTi is infamous around these parts
Allan... the 2sec gap he is referring to is the time dif between reaching a certain mph... so, if G is at 150mph, CS may be at 149mph, and while both are still speeding along, it takes another 2 sec for CS to reach 150mph... the mph dif between two won't result in a lot of car lengths.

You are talking about 2 second DELAY in reaching distant X... in this case, 2 sec is a life time... at 150mph, or 220 ft/sec, over the period of 2 sec, you are talking ~30 car lengths. You guys are "arguing" different things... apples and oranges.
 
  #67  
Old 11-05-2005, 12:37 PM
tdf360's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 0
tdf360 is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by allanlambo
Honestly, im terrible at math
Allen, that may be the first thing you've said I've ever agreed with!

Gary
 
  #68  
Old 11-05-2005, 12:39 PM
iLLM3's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SOFLA/NYC
Posts: 16,296
Rep Power: 716
iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !
Originally posted by tdf360
Allen, that may be the first thing you've said I've ever agreed with!

Gary
LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SM_ATL
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
18
07-05-2016 08:41 AM
SM_ATL
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
4
03-26-2016 03:02 PM
Texas1
Automobiles For Sale
6
09-20-2015 09:12 AM
falter
964 Turbo
0
09-04-2015 01:41 PM
falter
964 Turbo
0
09-04-2015 01:37 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 996 X50 vs. Gallardo..Which is quicker??



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:21 AM.