996TT vs Ferrari 360 CS Video
#19
Ha, definitely not a good representation of how fast the cars really are. That CS fell asleep at the beginning of the race and woke up 10 secs later.
I never really liked racing from a dig because it does not really prove much. Get those cars to race from a roll (Or maybe no that same TT since it is not stock) and then see what the outcome will be.
Either way, those are some beautiful cars...The CS is one of the most beautiful cars on the road imo
I never really liked racing from a dig because it does not really prove much. Get those cars to race from a roll (Or maybe no that same TT since it is not stock) and then see what the outcome will be.
Either way, those are some beautiful cars...The CS is one of the most beautiful cars on the road imo
#20
what you are seeing is the difference in torque. even if the CS had gotten the jump or even given a few car lengths it wouldn't have mattered the torque difference in sharkys would have over come the cs easily.
I knew should have gotten than intake. damn.
I knew should have gotten than intake. damn.
#21
Originally posted by SCvet00
Ha, definitely not a good representation of how fast the cars really are. That CS fell asleep at the beginning of the race and woke up 10 secs later.
I never really liked racing from a dig because it does not really prove much. Get those cars to race from a roll (Or maybe no that same TT since it is not stock) and then see what the outcome will be.
Either way, those are some beautiful cars...The CS is one of the most beautiful cars on the road imo
Ha, definitely not a good representation of how fast the cars really are. That CS fell asleep at the beginning of the race and woke up 10 secs later.
I never really liked racing from a dig because it does not really prove much. Get those cars to race from a roll (Or maybe no that same TT since it is not stock) and then see what the outcome will be.
Either way, those are some beautiful cars...The CS is one of the most beautiful cars on the road imo
#22
Originally posted by sharkster
LOL as Robert said.. we already did that with the CS and Murci... OK so the TT is not stock but it's a mid 10 second car with 135-138mph trap speeds so it's not a fair comparison.. However in terms of beauty... the Turbo is a poor 3rd in comparison
LOL as Robert said.. we already did that with the CS and Murci... OK so the TT is not stock but it's a mid 10 second car with 135-138mph trap speeds so it's not a fair comparison.. However in terms of beauty... the Turbo is a poor 3rd in comparison
#24
Originally posted by SCvet00
So how is it that the Murci was only ahead by like 1 car over the CS? They kept on saying "Even" in teh video, but it seemd to me like hte Murci was slightly ahead. I thought the Murci would beat the CS by a large amount. Was it driver error? Had to of been something, no?
So how is it that the Murci was only ahead by like 1 car over the CS? They kept on saying "Even" in teh video, but it seemd to me like hte Murci was slightly ahead. I thought the Murci would beat the CS by a large amount. Was it driver error? Had to of been something, no?
#28
Originally posted by Benjamin Choi
I'd still take the CS over that Turbo any day of the week
I'd still take the CS over that Turbo any day of the week
I'd take the Murci Roadster over both anyday though!
Murci Roadster is just pure SEXXXX!
#29
Originally posted by Benjamin Choi
I'd still take the CS over that Turbo any day of the week
I'd still take the CS over that Turbo any day of the week
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cnebrask
Automobiles For Sale
7
10-03-2024 08:19 PM