Well, I have to say, Upsolute really does make power... - Page 4 - 6SpeedOnline

#46

11-24-2003 | 08:04 AM

Duane

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 1,988

From: NEW ENGLAND

Rep Power: 112

The dyno used is a dynopack. It is very accurate. I have confirmed the numbers on two other dynos one being a dynojet and the other on GIAC's dyno. On all three my numbers were within 5 HP.

Last edited by Duane; 11-24-2003 at 08:11 AM.

#47

11-24-2003 | 08:16 AM

AMG ETR

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Sep 2003

Posts: 4,823

From: DFW, TX

Rep Power: 271

Thanks Duane...
Evan

#48

11-24-2003 | 09:54 AM

Josh/AWE

Former Vendor

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 6,669

From: Horsham, PA

Rep Power: 0

Quote:

Originally posted by Duane
The dyno used is a dynopack. It is very accurate. I have confirmed the numbers on two other dynos one being a dynojet and the other on GIAC's dyno. On all three my numbers were within 5 HP.

I'm not questioning the accuracy of the Dynapack, just trying to get some more info.

Do we know what the car dynoed stock?

I will question the difference between the Dynojet and the Mustang that GIAC uses.

The Mustang's throw a load at the car where the Dynojet is an inertia type. Dynojet numbers historically are always higer than a load type dyno such as the Mustang.

FYI- The Dynapack is a load type dyno.

Check out the differences here.
http://www.awe-tuning.com/pages/faq/...ain.cfm?FAQ=22

#49

11-24-2003 | 10:47 AM

msindi

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 8,395

From: Dubai, UAE + London, UK

Rep Power: 357

Mike does raise a good point though as different stock cars have different HP figures...In addition, the Fabspeed alone (without any ECU) can have substantial power gains so how much is coming thanx to the ECU becomes more unclear...