996 Stage IV dyno results
#17
12-08-2005, 09:51 PM
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,753
Rep Power: 112 
Originally posted by sharkster
Hahah... hey I'm in LA monday so this I'll have to see
No I won't bring my flasher!
Hahah... hey I'm in LA monday so this I'll have to see
No I won't bring my flasher!
#18
12-08-2005, 09:52 PM
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,753
Rep Power: 112
Originally posted by LSM
The pull without the headers was that with 109 octane and race setting as well??
The pull without the headers was that with 109 octane and race setting as well??
#19
12-08-2005, 10:32 PM
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,753
Rep Power: 112 
#20
12-08-2005, 11:03 PM
Very impressive numbers RennTech!!! 12% drivetrain loss sounds a bit low to me.
Assuming it was VP "Motorsport 109," it is actually 105 octane (the name is deceptive): http://www.vpracingfuels.com/vp_01_f...199B90E#leaded .
MOTORSPORT 109
• Motor Octane: 101
• Research Octane: 109
• R+M/2: 105
With the singular exception of Motorsport 109, VP names all other unleaded fuels according to the R+M/2 octane rating . . . for some inexplicable reason, VP names its Motorsport 109 fuel according to the research octane rating (rather than the traditional R+M/2 rating of 105). I am not aware of any R+M/2 109 octane unleaded fuel.
Craig
Originally posted by RennTechV12
Yes, the GIAC programmer set to "RACE" and 109 octane in the tank.
Yes, the GIAC programmer set to "RACE" and 109 octane in the tank.
MOTORSPORT 109
• Motor Octane: 101
• Research Octane: 109
• R+M/2: 105
With the singular exception of Motorsport 109, VP names all other unleaded fuels according to the R+M/2 octane rating . . . for some inexplicable reason, VP names its Motorsport 109 fuel according to the research octane rating (rather than the traditional R+M/2 rating of 105). I am not aware of any R+M/2 109 octane unleaded fuel.
Craig
That wasn't for you although that's a great lookin' curve.
#23
12-08-2005, 11:09 PM
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,753
Rep Power: 112
Originally posted by Craig
Assuming it was VP "Motorsport 109," it is actually 105 octane (the name is deceptive): http://www.vpracingfuels.com/vp_01_f...199B90E#leaded .
MOTORSPORT 109
• Motor Octane: 101
• Research Octane: 109
• R+M/2: 105
With the singular exception of Motorsport 109, VP names all other unleaded fuels according to the R+M/2 octane rating . . . for some inexplicable reason, VP names its Motorsport 109 fuel according to the research octane rating (rather than the traditional R+M/2 rating of 105). I am not aware of any R+M/2 109 octane unleaded fuel.
Craig
Assuming it was VP "Motorsport 109," it is actually 105 octane (the name is deceptive): http://www.vpracingfuels.com/vp_01_f...199B90E#leaded .
MOTORSPORT 109
• Motor Octane: 101
• Research Octane: 109
• R+M/2: 105
With the singular exception of Motorsport 109, VP names all other unleaded fuels according to the R+M/2 octane rating . . . for some inexplicable reason, VP names its Motorsport 109 fuel according to the research octane rating (rather than the traditional R+M/2 rating of 105). I am not aware of any R+M/2 109 octane unleaded fuel.
Craig
Originally posted by Craig
Very impressive numbers RennTech!!! 12% drivetrain loss sounds a bit low to me.Craig
Very impressive numbers RennTech!!! 12% drivetrain loss sounds a bit low to me.Craig
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BlackMarketRacing
996 Turbo / GT2
16
12-03-2015 10:46 AM
sdg1871
991 Turbo
77
09-12-2015 06:54 AM
