981rwhp 996TT?? (dyno chart in link)
#62
rmrmd1956,
thanks for the chart.
Great to see the direct comparisons.
I did a few 60-120 runs in my stage 4 the other day and whilst its not an exact science using a stopwatch i consistantly got 6.8 secs which seems to correspond well with your chart, considering the gear shifts on the stage 4 were 1.5 times the others!
I wasnt sure if 6.8 secs was that quick but a guess it cant be too bad after all!
thanks for the chart.
Great to see the direct comparisons.
I did a few 60-120 runs in my stage 4 the other day and whilst its not an exact science using a stopwatch i consistantly got 6.8 secs which seems to correspond well with your chart, considering the gear shifts on the stage 4 were 1.5 times the others!
I wasnt sure if 6.8 secs was that quick but a guess it cant be too bad after all!
Last edited by lee lovell; 01-03-2006 at 01:54 PM.
#63
Todd
I am only a Porschefile and this is a hobby so unfortunately I don't have much time to help out, but I will make a few contacts to try to find the right people. One thing that needs some clarification is what is meant by - if it makes sense to your company-, I hope you understand that I cannot put any conditions to a shootout. The guys there like 0-300km/h runs and everything in between, track and other few things. The rules will be the same for everyone. I will keep you posted, it could be a magazine converage as well. You must have good contacts with the new 911 since they covered you and Sharky for some nice pics lately, I am sure they are interested as well. I can get you close to the Porsche professional circle there no problem. Heidleberg is very close to Hockenheim, excellent coincidence.
rmrmd has done this excellent comparo, this is where I extrapolated the 100-200kph manually. The RUF GT2 is Guy's, it has taller tires and 7100 redline, this is why it shifts later. It was running in fact as heavy as the GT750 EVO, there is 160 hp difference between them. The stage 4 is, well, very slow.
Sharky, at mid 130 trap speeds, your weight, and a tip tronic you are running around 600 hp or a bit more, I already mentioned that, this level of course, you can maintain all day on the track, this corroborates what I have been saying earlier, 800-900 FWHP with 8 second run chassis dynos, are more like 600-700 max on the road. Check out the GT750 EVO and compare to the RUF. Your 800+HP, tip and weight should put you in the high 5 seconds or very low 6s.
Of course I could be wrong
Cheers.
I am only a Porschefile and this is a hobby so unfortunately I don't have much time to help out, but I will make a few contacts to try to find the right people. One thing that needs some clarification is what is meant by - if it makes sense to your company-, I hope you understand that I cannot put any conditions to a shootout. The guys there like 0-300km/h runs and everything in between, track and other few things. The rules will be the same for everyone. I will keep you posted, it could be a magazine converage as well. You must have good contacts with the new 911 since they covered you and Sharky for some nice pics lately, I am sure they are interested as well. I can get you close to the Porsche professional circle there no problem. Heidleberg is very close to Hockenheim, excellent coincidence.
rmrmd has done this excellent comparo, this is where I extrapolated the 100-200kph manually. The RUF GT2 is Guy's, it has taller tires and 7100 redline, this is why it shifts later. It was running in fact as heavy as the GT750 EVO, there is 160 hp difference between them. The stage 4 is, well, very slow.
Sharky, at mid 130 trap speeds, your weight, and a tip tronic you are running around 600 hp or a bit more, I already mentioned that, this level of course, you can maintain all day on the track, this corroborates what I have been saying earlier, 800-900 FWHP with 8 second run chassis dynos, are more like 600-700 max on the road. Check out the GT750 EVO and compare to the RUF. Your 800+HP, tip and weight should put you in the high 5 seconds or very low 6s.
Of course I could be wrong
Cheers.
#64
Originally posted by sharkster
Anyways, I will.. I will... and I will run those 60-130 times! I believe K24 madness is getting that AX-11 and said he'd lend it to me Otherwise it'll have to be a camera pointed at it with a timer
Anyways, I will.. I will... and I will run those 60-130 times! I believe K24 madness is getting that AX-11 and said he'd lend it to me Otherwise it'll have to be a camera pointed at it with a timer
what's the ax-11 do? i can't find any info.
i do have an AP-22 that i was planning to sell b/c i bought the Autogenuity scanner w/ its Speed Tracer capabilities. i better make sure they both do the same thing.
anyways, welcome to borrow it. once the rain clears, i want to do these calculations too w/ my car.
- chuck
#65
Originally posted by Kaizu
Hmm...You mean this sounds the same that most 600-750hp BMW's in Scandinavia are faster (street cars and 1/4mile for example) than those 700-800rwhp BMW's in the States.
But I'm not try to insult any tuners, I'm a happy and satisfied customer of EVO...hope Nate can ship my package soon!
Hmm...You mean this sounds the same that most 600-750hp BMW's in Scandinavia are faster (street cars and 1/4mile for example) than those 700-800rwhp BMW's in the States.
But I'm not try to insult any tuners, I'm a happy and satisfied customer of EVO...hope Nate can ship my package soon!
It's just marketing, don't expect the people who make money from fantasy power figures to give you a level playing field, least of all on this forum!
#66
Originally posted by Jean
rmrmd has done this excellent comparo, this is where I extrapolated the 100-200kph manually. The RUF GT2 is Guy's, it has taller tires and 7100 redline, this is why it shifts later. It was running in fact as heavy as the GT750 EVO, there is 160 hp difference between them. The stage 4 is, well, very slow.
. [/B]
rmrmd has done this excellent comparo, this is where I extrapolated the 100-200kph manually. The RUF GT2 is Guy's, it has taller tires and 7100 redline, this is why it shifts later. It was running in fact as heavy as the GT750 EVO, there is 160 hp difference between them. The stage 4 is, well, very slow.
. [/B]
#67
Ax22 is a GPS based data logger, cheaper but similar to what the car mags use.
http://www.race-technology.com/WebPa.../AX22Home.html
http://www.race-technology.com/WebPa.../AX22Home.html
#69
Originally posted by lee lovell
Surely if the gear shift times were the same then there would be little or no difference between the stage 4 and the Ruf.
Surely if the gear shift times were the same then there would be little or no difference between the stage 4 and the Ruf.
The RUF does not have any shifting advantage, they both shift twice during the run, if you fix a bit the first slow shift on the stage 4 (-0.2 s.) you would still be slower by about 1 second vs. the RUF with similar HP to it.
This is not an exact science but much more reliable than any dyno chart for sure.
#70
Originally posted by Jean
Sorry I did not mean slow as in "slow" but rather compared to its claimed HP, which is similar to the RUF, there is no doubt that those times are excellent by any standards.
The RUF does not have any shifting advantage, they both shift twice during the run, if you fix a bit the first slow shift on the stage 4 (-0.2 s.) you would still be slower by about 1 second vs. the RUF with similar HP to it.
This is not an exact science but much more reliable than any dyno chart for sure.
Sorry I did not mean slow as in "slow" but rather compared to its claimed HP, which is similar to the RUF, there is no doubt that those times are excellent by any standards.
The RUF does not have any shifting advantage, they both shift twice during the run, if you fix a bit the first slow shift on the stage 4 (-0.2 s.) you would still be slower by about 1 second vs. the RUF with similar HP to it.
This is not an exact science but much more reliable than any dyno chart for sure.
#71
I think it's rather foolish to compare a Stage 4 TT vs. Guy's Nardo GT2 thinking that they are anywhere close to equal.
I guarantee you will be sorely disappointed even with your beloved and omnipotent "race" program.
I guarantee you will be sorely disappointed even with your beloved and omnipotent "race" program.
#72
Originally posted by Hamann7
I think it's rather foolish to compare a Stage 4 TT vs. Guy's Nardo GT2 thinking that they are anywhere close to equal.
I guarantee you will be sorely disappointed even with your beloved and omnipotent "race" program.
I think it's rather foolish to compare a Stage 4 TT vs. Guy's Nardo GT2 thinking that they are anywhere close to equal.
I guarantee you will be sorely disappointed even with your beloved and omnipotent "race" program.
#73
Originally posted by Hamann7
I think it's rather foolish to compare a Stage 4 TT vs. Guy's Nardo GT2 thinking that they are anywhere close to equal.
I guarantee you will be sorely disappointed even with your beloved and omnipotent "race" program.
I think it's rather foolish to compare a Stage 4 TT vs. Guy's Nardo GT2 thinking that they are anywhere close to equal.
I guarantee you will be sorely disappointed even with your beloved and omnipotent "race" program.
#74
Originally posted by Jean
Todd
Sharky, at mid 130 trap speeds, your weight, and a tip tronic you are running around 600 hp or a bit more, I already mentioned that, this level of course, you can maintain all day on the track, this corroborates what I have been saying earlier, 800-900 FWHP with 8 second run chassis dynos, are more like 600-700 max on the road. Check out the GT750 EVO and compare to the RUF. Your 800+HP, tip and weight should put you in the high 5 seconds or very low 6s.
Of course I could be wrong
Cheers.
Todd
Sharky, at mid 130 trap speeds, your weight, and a tip tronic you are running around 600 hp or a bit more, I already mentioned that, this level of course, you can maintain all day on the track, this corroborates what I have been saying earlier, 800-900 FWHP with 8 second run chassis dynos, are more like 600-700 max on the road. Check out the GT750 EVO and compare to the RUF. Your 800+HP, tip and weight should put you in the high 5 seconds or very low 6s.
Of course I could be wrong
Cheers.
#75
Originally posted by Hamann7
I think it's rather foolish to compare a Stage 4 TT vs. Guy's Nardo GT2 thinking that they are anywhere close to equal.
I guarantee you will be sorely disappointed even with your beloved and omnipotent "race" program.
I think it's rather foolish to compare a Stage 4 TT vs. Guy's Nardo GT2 thinking that they are anywhere close to equal.
I guarantee you will be sorely disappointed even with your beloved and omnipotent "race" program.
Some of you guys are sooooo serious.