996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

New 4.5 Inch Intercooler Cores

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #46  
Old 02-05-2006 | 06:23 AM
Zippy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,787
From: Edmonton, Alberta
Rep Power: 208
Zippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by MARKSKI
they r made as one offs probably..... its far more cheaper to do what I did....
Markski - what are you going to be using for end tanks on those beasts?
 
  #47  
Old 02-05-2006 | 06:29 AM
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,720
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 602
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Zippy
Markski - what are you going to be using for end tanks on those beasts?
here is a sneak peak.. but I dont want to steal the original thread.... Craig will do these as well..and Im sure they will be very nicely done. I had 3 days to do them.... but all in all Im happy.
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




  #48  
Old 02-06-2006 | 01:35 AM
Turbolark's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 15
From: Alta Loma,CA
Rep Power: 0
Turbolark is infamous around these parts
I understand that you want the bigger coolers for more airflow, but why go so thick? The second half of the thickness will do so much less cooling than the front half. Basically you are just moving the heat soaked portion back farther from the cooler air. I hope there is a plan to datalog air temps before and after the cooler to compare to the same datalogging done with the gt2 coolers.
 
  #49  
Old 02-06-2006 | 04:32 AM
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,720
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 602
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Turbolark
I understand that you want the bigger coolers for more airflow, but why go so thick? The second half of the thickness will do so much less cooling than the front half. Basically you are just moving the heat soaked portion back farther from the cooler air. I hope there is a plan to datalog air temps before and after the cooler to compare to the same datalogging done with the gt2 coolers.
these are 4.5 inches thick.... I was adviced by Todd t protomotive that these will be a good choice.. Yes I could have gone with 3.5 inches thick....but Im going to be running 2 garrett gt 35r ball bearing turbos... I need to improve the efficiency of my cooling... the intercooler is just a small part of the whole system that Im doing... ie. 850 rwhp
I have a 10 second Evo 8 tahst also runs a single gtr35r.. and that Intercooler is 28 inches long.. 8 inches wide.... and 4 inches thick.... and its the best thing I could have done to it....
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL





Last edited by markski@markskituning; 02-06-2006 at 04:36 AM.
  #50  
Old 02-06-2006 | 02:17 PM
K24madness's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 739
From: Bay Area, California
Rep Power: 50
K24madness is infamous around these parts
Mark,

The major difference between your EVO and 996 intercoolers in the air in front of the EVO will be higher pressure forceing it throught the core. With the inlets of the 996 the pressure created will not be as high.

Not sure how the extra thickness will impead flow through the core. As with all things new, the results will speak for themself.
 
  #51  
Old 02-06-2006 | 02:23 PM
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,720
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 602
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by K24madness
Mark,

The major difference between your EVO and 996 intercoolers in the air in front of the EVO will be higher pressure forceing it throught the core. With the inlets of the 996 the pressure created will not be as high.

Not sure how the extra thickness will impead flow through the core. As with all things new, the results will speak for themself.
I agree... Todd uses a 3.5 core but a bit wider.... and yet does this on his high HP cars... Yes , we are dealing with ambient air.... its not in front like on my evo8... but he believes they will be fine....
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




  #52  
Old 02-06-2006 | 02:42 PM
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Moderator
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1226
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by MARKSKI
I agree... Todd uses a 3.5 core but a bit wider.... and yet does this on his high HP cars... Yes , we are dealing with ambient air.... its not in front like on my evo8... but he believes they will be fine....
I would think with all the money involved, that those who are selling the product would have some numbers to back up what they believe. Where are the efficiency numbers for these IC cores? I find this very hard to believe that the manufacturer doesn't have any profile numbers. Has anyone requested these numbers?

I have been in this game to long to install anyone else's product without seeing some honest numbers. Yes, without the numbers I am a "Doubting Thomas." Just been burnt too many times before. These cores do look very nice ......... but do they function better?
 

Last edited by cjv; 02-06-2006 at 02:50 PM.
  #53  
Old 02-06-2006 | 03:53 PM
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,720
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 602
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Chad.. no one is selling these to the public... I made them for myself...
After consulting Todd @protomotive... I decided to go with that core size....
and yes the end tanks could have been better "looking".. but had a deadline to finish the product up.... b4 my car gets shipped out.... the guy who build the end tanks builds Ics for cars that do 9s and 10s 1/4 mile... and they r street cars... I think he knows what hes doing....
mark
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




  #54  
Old 02-06-2006 | 04:43 PM
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Moderator
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1226
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by MARKSKI
Chad.. no one is selling these to the public... I made them for myself...
After consulting Todd @protomotive... I decided to go with that core size....
and yes the end tanks could have been better "looking".. but had a deadline to finish the product up.... b4 my car gets shipped out.... the guy who build the end tanks builds Ics for cars that do 9s and 10s 1/4 mile... and they r street cars... I think he knows what hes doing....
mark
MARKSKI,

I understand what is occuring now. You are prototyping and bravely going where others have not gone before. I have done the same, sometimes it is successful and sometimes it isn't. Please let us know what the delta and efficiency is when the final product has been tested.

By the way, I really hope it is a success.
 
  #55  
Old 02-06-2006 | 04:45 PM
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,720
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 602
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by cjv
MARKSKI,

I understand what is occuring now. You are prototyping and bravely going where others have not gone before. I have done the same, sometimes it is successful and sometimes it isn't. Please let us know what the delta and efficiency is when the final product has been tested.
By the way, I really hope it is a success.
Im sure ill get some figures and post
Craig will do his and probably have figure b4 me....
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




  #56  
Old 04-07-2009 | 10:18 AM
mando's Avatar
Awaiting Email Confirmation
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23
From: Belgium
Rep Power: 0
mando is infamous around these parts
Thicker doesn't mean better, it all depends on the power you're running, simple equations regarding airflow and air velocity!
If a core is too large air will get lost in it, think about a 1 gallon and a 5 galon tank with two pipes attached next to each other, take a deep breath and blow into one pipe, do the same with the other tank and feel the difference of airflow and pressure comming out of the other pipe!
In the Belcar (Belgian GT series) there's a team that used to go with Secan but not anymore, the intercoolers they use now (Blizzard Intercoolers) give them a 11°C maximum increase over ambient temperature during the race (this is not at the end of the straight but the highest rise in temperature over the entire track!!) car runs 700hp at 0.9bar of boost (this also determines the internals of the core!)
Too bad that they don't sell to end users but only work with serious tuners or racing teams. For the US Titan Motorsport is expecting a street version of the intercoolers.

greetz mando
 

Last edited by mando; 04-07-2009 at 10:44 AM.
  #57  
Old 04-07-2009 | 10:35 AM
$manager's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 771
From: NC
Rep Power: 121
$manager Is a GOD !$manager Is a GOD !$manager Is a GOD !$manager Is a GOD !$manager Is a GOD !$manager Is a GOD !$manager Is a GOD !$manager Is a GOD !$manager Is a GOD !$manager Is a GOD !$manager Is a GOD !
Hey Chad-
Can you comment on the above statement/analogy of a 1 gallon vs 5 gallon tanks and a breath of air?

If you don't compress the air aren't you moving the same volume no matter what size the "container" is?

I don't know one way or another, just asking...
 
  #58  
Old 04-07-2009 | 12:07 PM
Dr_jitsu's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,083
From: Texas
Rep Power: 671
Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !
Mando,

Been working on that post for 3 years now, huh

So whattya think about the stock market hitting 1400, think it will hit 1500?
 
  #59  
Old 04-07-2009 | 12:12 PM
heavychevy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,934
From: ga
Rep Power: 551
heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !
Lol....
 
  #60  
Old 04-07-2009 | 01:11 PM
mando's Avatar
Awaiting Email Confirmation
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23
From: Belgium
Rep Power: 0
mando is infamous around these parts
just new to the forum and as it is intercooler related it got my intrest indeed I didn't look at the date of the last post before mine

greetz mando

to be honest the course it took to be able to make the reply just got finished
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 AM.