10.65 @ 135.43...
#76
03-14-2006 | 02:22 AM
Originally Posted by Neil
Are you going to 1.6 bar.the max we ever run is 1.2 even on our 850.Best of luck should be a blast when finished.
Neil
Neil
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
#78
03-14-2006 | 03:08 AM
Originally Posted by KompressorKev
wow, that's gonna be some serious power 
imagine two turbos.
VAlexander knows exactly the feeling....
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
#79
03-14-2006 | 06:24 AM
Banned
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 508
Rep Power: 41
Originally Posted by MARKSKI
yes I know... since I already have one fully built motor running a single garrett gt35r at 35 psi.... I know the feeling...
imagine two turbos.
VAlexander knows exactly the feeling....
imagine two turbos.
VAlexander knows exactly the feeling....
#80
03-14-2006 | 10:18 AM
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,325
From: Michigan
Rep Power: 333
The main difference is RWD vs AWD. On the drag strip RWD allows great weight transfer and an explosive start. With AWD you are fighting bogging or wheel hop. You don't see Top Fuel dragsters running AWD.
#81
03-14-2006 | 11:42 AM
Porsche Fiend
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,875
From: Malibu, CA
Rep Power: 138
Originally Posted by cjv
I find this discussion very interesting. Three years ago when we had alot less power Dave Colman from Excellence cranked out a 1.61 sec 60 ft time and a 11.3 or 11.4 @ 126 with my car.
I had to listen to all the sh*t talk. I believe the Stage 4 was the best that was out at the time. My how things have changed.
I had to listen to all the sh*t talk. I believe the Stage 4 was the best that was out at the time. My how things have changed.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, but many people here just don't seem to get it. Peak dyno numbers only mean so much... actually it doesn't mean ****. It's how the engine makes the power that counts, or the "area under the curve." It's amazing how many people here get suckered into buying tuning packages so they can brag about their dyno numbers. Performance is what counts, not numbers off some crappy DynoJet.
Congrats Divexxxtreme on an awesome run! Glad Protomotive delivered some good results for you.
#82
03-16-2006 | 06:36 AM
Awaiting Email Confirmation
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 611
From: Sydney, Australia
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Hamann7
.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, but many people here just don't seem to get it. Peak dyno numbers only mean so much... actually it doesn't mean ****. It's how the engine makes the power that counts, or the "area under the curve." It's amazing how many people here get suckered into buying tuning packages so they can brag about their dyno numbers. Performance is what counts, not numbers off some crappy DynoJet.
..
I've said it before and I'll say it again, but many people here just don't seem to get it. Peak dyno numbers only mean so much... actually it doesn't mean ****. It's how the engine makes the power that counts, or the "area under the curve." It's amazing how many people here get suckered into buying tuning packages so they can brag about their dyno numbers. Performance is what counts, not numbers off some crappy DynoJet.
..
.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MBailey
996 Turbo / GT2
1623
01-29-2018 03:58 PM
Divexxtreme
996 Turbo / GT2
4229
10-31-2011 01:49 PM