996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

B&M vs Evo short shifter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-01-2006, 04:21 PM
musclecar6's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: charlotte,nc
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 0
musclecar6 is infamous around these parts
B&M vs Evo short shifter

I tried out a short shifter in a 996 that the salesman said was the porsche short shifter (that I understand is made by B&M) Although it was more precise than stock by quite a bit it was a little stiff for everyday use Imho. On Evo's website they sell both the B&M & their own Evo shifter. Has anyone had any experience comparing the two of them. I have had short shifter's before in my Vette & M-3 & although the throw & precise action was better than stock they became a little tiresome over time. If you have the Evo or B&M or Porsche short shifter curious as to your take on them, Thanks for any help.
 
  #2  
Old 04-01-2006, 08:43 PM
wross996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Age: 64
Posts: 4,661
Rep Power: 252
wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !
I have the B&M...love it...would never go back to stock...smooth as silk.
 
  #3  
Old 04-01-2006, 10:02 PM
tom kerr's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: tampa florida
Posts: 3,577
Rep Power: 209
tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !
My Porsche SSK (really a B&M) smooth and precise, but by the nature of a shorter throw it will require "more effort". So I would assume any shorter throw is going to give you the same feeling. So......as I said in a former post these SSK's are not liked or appreciated by everybody, personal preferences.
 
  #4  
Old 04-02-2006, 07:45 AM
Ruiner's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,321
Rep Power: 71
Ruiner is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by tom kerr
My Porsche SSK (really a B&M) smooth and precise, but by the nature of a shorter throw it will require "more effort". So I would assume any shorter throw is going to give you the same feeling. So......as I said in a former post these SSK's are not liked or appreciated by everybody, personal preferences.
That about sums it up as accurately as possible. Nice job.

I run the B&M shifter with the EVO Shift-linkage and have for the previous 25k or so. It is a bit more notchy than the stock setup, but I wouldn't have it any other way. The B&M SSK really "connects" you with the car.
 

Last edited by Ruiner; 04-02-2006 at 07:47 AM.
  #5  
Old 04-03-2006, 02:17 AM
tme's Avatar
tme
tme is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 601
Rep Power: 46
tme is infamous around these parts
Had the EVO Ron/Vipertest... swapped it for the B&M. B&M is much smother-not as notchy and a tad shorter throw. Had the pop out of 2nd thing happen twice over a year but I would deff go B&M. EVO looks like it but it don't feel like it........ It ain't bad but I think the b&M is a step up.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
steve harris
996 Turbo / GT2
36
06-10-2017 12:17 AM
turb0terr0r
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
2
09-29-2015 05:47 PM
bongnation
Automobiles For Sale
9
09-25-2015 02:58 PM
997zen
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
4
09-07-2015 07:13 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: B&M vs Evo short shifter



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:54 PM.