The GT2 project has begun!
#122
Originally Posted by LUIS95993
I am coming from N Scottsdale so yes, lets drive down there together, Ill call you Fri.
I think we are going to go on Sun. 9:30am @ Apple?
I think we are going to go on Sun. 9:30am @ Apple?
#127
Originally Posted by Craig
Those are GREAT numbers Joe. Congratulations.
Did you give my car a biscuit while you were there?
Craig
Did you give my car a biscuit while you were there?
Craig
#130
Originally Posted by drjoe
Joe is there a race tune for the gt700 (102 vs 93 octane)..and how much more power..
#133
Joe... once you build the motor you can then run the _crazy_ GT700 file I rode in the yellow one that day and with the built motor, more timing/boost and cams.. mumma that thing is supposed to be in the high 600s!
#134
AWESOME numbers Joe!
when you say uncorrected do you mean that there was no correction factor for temperature, humidity, etc. or that the numbers have not been corrected to reflect HP at the crank?
when you say uncorrected do you mean that there was no correction factor for temperature, humidity, etc. or that the numbers have not been corrected to reflect HP at the crank?
Originally Posted by RennTechV12
The car is finally done! (except for axles and new Y-pipe) We put it on the dyno today. The intake temp. on the pulls was 99f
The car made 631hp and 646tq (I'll get the print out and post it tomorrow) My TT made 641/641 with an intake temp of 61f in January. Can't wait to see what it runs on Friday at the strip (the temp is supposed to be 113f)
The car made 631hp and 646tq (I'll get the print out and post it tomorrow) My TT made 641/641 with an intake temp of 61f in January. Can't wait to see what it runs on Friday at the strip (the temp is supposed to be 113f)
#135
Originally Posted by AZBoostjunkie
AWESOME numbers Joe!
when you say uncorrected do you mean that there was no correction factor for temperature, humidity, etc. or that the numbers have not been corrected to reflect HP at the crank?
when you say uncorrected do you mean that there was no correction factor for temperature, humidity, etc. or that the numbers have not been corrected to reflect HP at the crank?