6speedonline's official 60-130, 1/4 Mile, and Standing Mile list
#4066
08-16-2011, 06:06 PM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,510
Rep Power: 788 
New 60-130 record! Underground Racing took Bob Helm's E-Gear TT Gallardo to a 3.04 with 1-shift at 1550+ rwhp! Peak G's were 2.375!
#4068
08-16-2011, 06:49 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: GTA, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,666
Rep Power: 235
ya know, I just don't feel like posting my own times anymore. Seems so unimpressive now.
Just kidding, I'm still happy with my relatively pedestrian times but 3.04??? WOW!
Imho, anything under 10s or so feels pretty fast...
Just kidding, I'm still happy with my relatively pedestrian times but 3.04??? WOW!
Imho, anything under 10s or so feels pretty fast...
#4070
08-16-2011, 08:16 PM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,510
Rep Power: 788 
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 08-17-2011 at 07:01 AM.
#4071
08-17-2011, 04:43 AM
Ha ha...of course that won't happen. GT-Rs are running 60-130s that are within 3/100ths of a second with 300 less whp, 200 lbs more weight, during 1/4 mile runs (which produce times that are almost always slower than during dedicated 60-30 runs). GT-Rs will continue to get more powerful and faster at an exponential rate.
Well then...
#4072
08-17-2011, 06:26 AM
Ha ha...of course that won't happen. GT-Rs are running 60-130s that are within 3/100ths of a second with 300 less whp, 200 lbs more weight, during 1/4 mile runs (which produce times that are almost always slower than during dedicated 60-30 runs). GT-Rs will continue to get more powerful and faster at an exponential rate.
#4073
08-17-2011, 06:37 AM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,510
Rep Power: 788 
#4074
08-17-2011, 07:25 AM
The peak G's on that 3.04 run are strange. No doubt it did the 3.04, but the G's looked to be reading incorrectly.
#4075
08-17-2011, 07:28 AM
#4076
08-17-2011, 07:29 AM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,510
Rep Power: 788
No problem with the peak G's. They occured after the shift. The tires were hot, they hooked, and launched the car forward. I've seen the same thing before with other cars. From 60-100 my GT-R was actually faster, but it was after the shift where the TTG was 'thrown' forward that it made up the time. The 100-130 time on that run was ridiculously fast.
#4077
08-17-2011, 07:43 AM
IIRC, the VBox does not have internal accelerometers, instead calculates it based on GPS acceleration data.
#4078
08-17-2011, 07:54 AM
Ha ha...of course that won't happen. GT-Rs are running 60-130s that are within 3/10ths of a second with 300 less whp, 200 lbs more weight, during 1/4 mile runs (which produce times that are almost always slower than during dedicated 60-30 runs). GT-Rs will continue to get more powerful and faster at an exponential rate.
I would like to see exponential increases but more realistically, 1-mile comparisons between the two monsters.
#4079
08-17-2011, 07:59 AM
Basic Sponsor
true that, i always noticed that on my car...
__________________
#TeamAIM
997TT SilverSpool - 210.8 mph 1/2 Mile WR Apr 2019, 9.2 @ 168 mph 1/4 Mile Manual World Record , 3.15 60-130 mph , 2.72 100-150 mph , 1400whp E85
996TT SpoolBus - 204.6 mph 1/2 Mile 996TT WR Aug 2018, 9.5 @ 154 mph, 3.23 60-130 mph, 2.5 100-150 mph Manual Porsche World Record, 1400whp E85
997TT SlowBerry - 205.0 mph 1/2 Mile WR Nov 2018, 9.7 @ 170 mph 1/4 Mile , 3.2 60-130 mph , 2.4 100-150 mph , 1420whp E85
ESMOTOR | DO88 | TPC DSC | SYVECS | COBB | IPD | KLINE | XONA | AMS | ID | ERP | SACHS | TURBOSMART | CSF | DODSON |
#TeamAIM
997TT SilverSpool - 210.8 mph 1/2 Mile WR Apr 2019, 9.2 @ 168 mph 1/4 Mile Manual World Record , 3.15 60-130 mph , 2.72 100-150 mph , 1400whp E85
996TT SpoolBus - 204.6 mph 1/2 Mile 996TT WR Aug 2018, 9.5 @ 154 mph, 3.23 60-130 mph, 2.5 100-150 mph Manual Porsche World Record, 1400whp E85
997TT SlowBerry - 205.0 mph 1/2 Mile WR Nov 2018, 9.7 @ 170 mph 1/4 Mile , 3.2 60-130 mph , 2.4 100-150 mph , 1420whp E85
ESMOTOR | DO88 | TPC DSC | SYVECS | COBB | IPD | KLINE | XONA | AMS | ID | ERP | SACHS | TURBOSMART | CSF | DODSON |
#4080
08-17-2011, 08:01 AM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,510
Rep Power: 788 The more aggressive gearing is probably the biggest factor along with the DCT vs the single clutch. Possibly better aerodynamics a small factor (haven't compared surface area, only .cd). No mention of weight reduction on either models in general.
I would like to see exponential increases but more realistically, 1-mile comparisons between the two monsters.
I would like to see exponential increases but more realistically, 1-mile comparisons between the two monsters.