6speedonline's official 60-130, 1/4 Mile, and Standing Mile list
#661
Here's the video. I tried setting the camera up so you could see the P-box screen, but I was having a hard time securing it in a good spot.
http://media.putfile.com/Stock-C6-Z06-786-60-130
http://media.putfile.com/Stock-C6-Z06-786-60-130
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 04-15-2008 at 01:26 PM.
#662
My 2nd to 3rd shift cost me .13 seconds and my 3rd to 4th cost me .16 seconds for 3rd and 4th. Without shifts, I could have hit 7.5x...but of course, that's part of owning a manual.
Have you had a chance to rerun your 911?
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 04-15-2008 at 03:55 PM.
#663
Well, I need every advantage I can get since I have to shift and you don't.
My 2nd to 3rd shift cost me .13 seconds and my 3rd to 4th cost me .16 seconds for 3rd and 4th. Without shifts I could have hit 7.5x.
Not today. I had an appointmment I had to go to right after I got back from the running the Z.
My 2nd to 3rd shift cost me .13 seconds and my 3rd to 4th cost me .16 seconds for 3rd and 4th. Without shifts I could have hit 7.5x.
Not today. I had an appointmment I had to go to right after I got back from the running the Z.
To keep you motivated, I took the SL65 out again today and pulled a 7.48 sec. 60-130mph run on a 2.3% decline. Temp was quite a bit warmer and very sunny at 60 degrees. Today, the pressure was better at 30.27 and humidity was down to around 32%. I still think she has better 60-130 times in her in ideal conditions (for around here).
I do think the conditions were nearly ideal (for around here) for 0-60 and 0-100mph runs. I ripped off my best ever in that car today, resulting in 3.63 and 7.38 seconds respectively. (same run) Elevation was almost perfectly flat with only a 5 foot drop across over 600 feet. On that run my 60' was 2.050 @ 35.53, 330' was 5.20 @ 78.31 and the 1/8 was 7.68 @ 102.53.
I emailed you the dbn file for the 60-130mph run of 7.48 Scott, thanks.
#664
Scott, you are a shifting ****! My one TTG shift on my 5.22 run took .4 seconds, and that is with Egear.
To keep you motivated, I took the SL65 out again today and pulled a 7.48 sec. 60-130mph run on a 2.3% decline. Temp was quite a bit warmer and very sunny at 60 degrees. Today, the pressure was better at 30.27 and humidity was down to around 32%. I still think she has better 60-130 times in her in ideal conditions (for around here).
To keep you motivated, I took the SL65 out again today and pulled a 7.48 sec. 60-130mph run on a 2.3% decline. Temp was quite a bit warmer and very sunny at 60 degrees. Today, the pressure was better at 30.27 and humidity was down to around 32%. I still think she has better 60-130 times in her in ideal conditions (for around here).
LOL...you are really making me work here.
I do think the conditions were nearly ideal (for around here) for 0-60 and 0-100mph runs. I ripped off my best ever in that car today, resulting in 3.63 and 7.38 seconds respectively. (same run) Elevation was almost perfectly flat with only a 5 foot drop across over 600 feet. On that run my 60' was 2.050 @ 35.53, 330' was 5.20 @ 78.31 and the 1/8 was 7.68 @ 102.53.
Your weather conditions are awesome right now, Aaron. You really need to do get out and do another run in the TTG ASAP!
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 04-15-2008 at 04:13 PM.
#665
I am going to give the SL65 a break and let you catch up . I am planning on doing some runs in the TTG tomorrow, traffic is a nightmare now. I think it will be a little bit warmer around 70 degrees tomorrow, hopefully the humidity and pressure will cooperate too.
Aaron
#666
Scott when you get a chance could you move me up a spot on the list, you changed the time, but didnt resort the order.
#667
IRT the AX-22 showing elevation/height...this is news to me. Non of the graphs you guys ever post on Rennlist ever show height/elevation (so for all we know, many of those runs might have occurred on 10% declines)....and TB993TT even stated in a thread that the AX-22 did not not measure slope or elevation (discussion begins at post #159 http://forums.rennlist.com/rennforum...+12DegC&page=5 ). ..
If my experience at the track can be useful, I use extensively the AX22 and its measurements are spot on lap after lap on all parameters. I also use a Pbox for its convenience and size rather.
This 60-130 has been going on for 3-4 years for me now and I lost interest in it, but I enjoy seeing how far it has gone, and especially, enjoy seeing records broken, especially from people I know!
#669
So that means my 8.16 run on the AX22 counts right?
Heh heh, just kidding (but no, not really)
Heh heh, just kidding (but no, not really)
#670
Scott, you are welcome.
Jimmer, your run still doesn't count, it was too cold!
Jimmer, your run still doesn't count, it was too cold!
#671
If the AX22 is valid, why not assign a willing expert to validate the runs? I paid $800 for the thing last year with a desire to post some runs this summer. If it's not a valid tool, I'll replace it. Otherwise, why not get a trusted & willing scrutinizer to approve its data?
Mike
Mike
#672
Jean knows it better than anyone. Hmmm...
#673
My nomination for the AX-22 aka Axis of evil, is for Sean "W's *****" Reid to be the The Central Scrutinizer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUJpnbO3YNc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUJpnbO3YNc
Last edited by TXGold; 04-18-2008 at 01:41 AM.
#674
Congrats to TXGold, Ryan, I just got his 8.40 file and am waiting on Scott to verify.
#675