6speedonline's official 60-130, 1/4 Mile, and Standing Mile list
#721
Congrats Ryan! Nice runs.
#722
Just like I said on the phone earlier.. Those times are insane!
Lets get that beast to the track and see if we can set a K16 record
Lets get that beast to the track and see if we can set a K16 record
#723
#724
Yes those graphs look much better. Have to be blind not to see what looked like a second shift on the previous ones due to the cr@ppy long G lines. Divexxtreme also thought the same.
Maybe this makes the Einsteins out there feel better?
Maybe this makes the Einsteins out there feel better?
#725
I know they do if they are tuned for it, Dez. But I'm not sure how they respond by just using better fuel and not advancing timing or increasing boost.
Here are some threads for you to peruse:
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=59970&highlight=lsd
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=121694&highlight=lsd
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=55861&highlight=lsd
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52385&highlight=lsd
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=78491&highlight=lsd
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=98601&highlight=lsd
Here are some threads for you to peruse:
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=59970&highlight=lsd
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=121694&highlight=lsd
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=55861&highlight=lsd
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52385&highlight=lsd
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=78491&highlight=lsd
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=98601&highlight=lsd
thanks for looking that up.
who's the naysayer, speak up.
Last edited by heavychevy; 04-22-2008 at 10:38 PM.
#726
The more I read about the LSD, the less I like it. Added understeer? WTH!?!?! Makes it even more pointless on an AWD car. Now you have both power understeer and forced understeer to dial out. May work for some, but if you arent pulling your hair out or have tons of front downforce, you've modded beyond your driving capability.
And if I go RWD then I essentially add back the understeer I was trying to get rid of. Or am I reading to much into it? This is terrible. Screw it, I'm going to go about 3.5 degrees negative camber in the front and see how that does.
And if I go RWD then I essentially add back the understeer I was trying to get rid of. Or am I reading to much into it? This is terrible. Screw it, I'm going to go about 3.5 degrees negative camber in the front and see how that does.
#727
KPG I am flattered and thank you. Thanks Joe and Chris.
Jean, how could you think there was a shift involved when there is a positive increase in G's. The little I know about this stuff leads me to believe that a positive G would not be present because of a shift. BTW, why don't you go get some 60-130 or 1/4 times for us to ridicule.
::
Jean, how could you think there was a shift involved when there is a positive increase in G's. The little I know about this stuff leads me to believe that a positive G would not be present because of a shift. BTW, why don't you go get some 60-130 or 1/4 times for us to ridicule.
::
#728
Why do you think you could ridicule them and why is it funny?
#729
wow.. 7 sec on stock z06 i never know it goes that fast..
#730
Jean,
Just for clarification, I never once thought it was a second shift. As I told you via PM's, I assumed that due to the speed in which it ocurred and the unlikeliness that TXGold would lie...it was either caused by engine hesitation during acceleration, or another similar anomaly.
I never thought for a moment that there was any dishonesty on the part of TXGold about his runs, nor did I ever tell you anything of the like.
#731
#732
I didn't either until I did it. The car is deceptively quick.
I'm going to try 100 octane in her to see if it makes any difference. I don't think it will do much in a bone stock car, but I'm going to try anyway.
I'm going to try 100 octane in her to see if it makes any difference. I don't think it will do much in a bone stock car, but I'm going to try anyway.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 04-23-2008 at 05:39 AM.
#733
KPG I am flattered and thank you. Thanks Joe and Chris.
Jean, how could you think there was a shift involved when there is a positive increase in G's. The little I know about this stuff leads me to believe that a positive G would not be present because of a shift. BTW, why don't you go get some 60-130 or 1/4 times for us to ridicule.
::
Jean, how could you think there was a shift involved when there is a positive increase in G's. The little I know about this stuff leads me to believe that a positive G would not be present because of a shift. BTW, why don't you go get some 60-130 or 1/4 times for us to ridicule.
::
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 04-23-2008 at 05:44 AM.
#734
i dont think it will as well unless you do some settings.
#735
well good luck anyway, dont blow up the car. and be safe in the track !
cheers
cheers