I want to see Pic and Info on the Badest Porsches!!!
#61
Originally Posted by z8cw
Oh my, excuse me...not catching up, outdoing yourself.
From my RX7 experience I knew you have to increase the breathing capability of your engine by porting rather than just throwing bigger and bigger turbos on the engine.
Fabulous
From my RX7 experience I knew you have to increase the breathing capability of your engine by porting rather than just throwing bigger and bigger turbos on the engine.
Fabulous
its on a GT3 RS race head with gt3 intake and exhaust cams... lower end was redone as well.... and thats just the beginning. we got rid of vario cam and now its running on gt3 street software. The fuel system is just like VRalexanders'... except I have a dual pump set up running parallel sucking from each sponson. We have the same setups except the heads...
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
#62
Originally Posted by MARKSKI
I never said I just thru on bigger turbos. LOL
its on a GT3 RS race head with gt3 intake and exhaust cams... lower end was redone as well.... and thats just the beginning. we got rid of vario cam and now its running on gt3 street software. The fuel system is just like VRalexanders'... except I have a dual pump set up running parallel sucking from each sponson. We have the same setups except the heads...
its on a GT3 RS race head with gt3 intake and exhaust cams... lower end was redone as well.... and thats just the beginning. we got rid of vario cam and now its running on gt3 street software. The fuel system is just like VRalexanders'... except I have a dual pump set up running parallel sucking from each sponson. We have the same setups except the heads...
#67
Originally Posted by dgussin1
Markski, when the car is done, can I have a ride?!?!
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
#68
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by AdamT
This is a question for the mega bhp guys:
Have you considered going to 3,8 litres? Just wondering what the pros and cons would be
thanks
adam
Have you considered going to 3,8 litres? Just wondering what the pros and cons would be
thanks
adam
#70
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by AdamT
Thanks alex,
So if you increased displacement you dont think there would be any appreciable gains in bhp or turbo response?
very best
adam
So if you increased displacement you dont think there would be any appreciable gains in bhp or turbo response?
very best
adam
Attachment 44821 <---Port work on my 996tt...368cfm!
Last edited by VRAlexander; 01-24-2007 at 04:00 AM.
#71
Originally Posted by VRAlexander
the key to these engines is breathing...HEAD WORK....HEAD WORK....HEAD WORK!
Attachment 44821 <---Port work on my 996tt...368cfm!
Attachment 44821 <---Port work on my 996tt...368cfm!
As compared to stock:
Using the same tubos, my engine flows considerably more air, and makes more power, at lower boost, simply by virtue of the head work.
Craig
#74
Since we are showing off out heads I might as well do mine LOL
GT3 RS race head...
GT3 RS race head...
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
#75
Originally Posted by Gramicci101
Wow. That's a huge difference, Craig. The leading edge looks a little rough. Is that fine, or should it be knife edged?
But in the most simplistic terms, think golfballs.
I'm so not getting into fluidynamics right now