Dyno results!
#18
10-26-2006 | 03:01 AM
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,163
From: Earth
Rep Power: 90
Scott
It can certainly be an issue with the chassis dyno as you point out, but maybe not this one (brand) in particular.. The problem is that this might start yet another debate on dynos and I am not up to it. Chassis dyno readings are seen all over the place lately, don't know why, or maybe it is because we are seeing more of them posted around
When you do a quick run on a chassis dyno you can see these spikes often, depends on the load being put on the run and speed at which the run is made. The problem is not the curve drop in itself, it is the peak rather, that should not be there in the first place. When you are on the road that peak will not be there.
Without AFRs, boost, knock sensing it is difficult to know exactly but this is my amateurish explanation.
It can certainly be an issue with the chassis dyno as you point out, but maybe not this one (brand) in particular.. The problem is that this might start yet another debate on dynos and I am not up to it. Chassis dyno readings are seen all over the place lately, don't know why, or maybe it is because we are seeing more of them posted around
When you do a quick run on a chassis dyno you can see these spikes often, depends on the load being put on the run and speed at which the run is made. The problem is not the curve drop in itself, it is the peak rather, that should not be there in the first place. When you are on the road that peak will not be there.
Without AFRs, boost, knock sensing it is difficult to know exactly but this is my amateurish explanation.
#19
10-26-2006 | 03:32 AM
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,510
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 788
Originally Posted by Jean
Scott
It can certainly be an issue with the chassis dyno as you point out, but maybe not this one (brand) in particular.. The problem is that this might start yet another debate on dynos and I am not up to it.
It can certainly be an issue with the chassis dyno as you point out, but maybe not this one (brand) in particular.. The problem is that this might start yet another debate on dynos and I am not up to it.
Other than speed through a 60ft, trap speeds and a couple of dozen things we agree on everything
#21
10-26-2006 | 08:03 AM
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,596
From: NY
Rep Power: 330
Originally Posted by iLLM3
Numbers arent bad for the dyno and in awd, congrats! Your in LI i see, havent seen you out anywhere, runs or shows! Where on LI are you?
Martin
Martin
#22
10-26-2006 | 08:17 AM
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,726
From: Michigan
Rep Power: 415
Originally Posted by Jean
Scott
The problem is that this might start yet another debate on dynos and I am not up to it.
The problem is that this might start yet another debate on dynos and I am not up to it.
Kevin
#25
10-26-2006 | 02:55 PM
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,596
From: NY
Rep Power: 330
All this about different Dynos has me thinking!! made a few calls & will be
dynoing my car tommorow with a dyno jet AWD. I know there different
dyno' s, time, temp, etc, but I'll be able to see the different torgue curves & have a different perspective!! Just curious!!
dynoing my car tommorow with a dyno jet AWD. I know there different
dyno' s, time, temp, etc, but I'll be able to see the different torgue curves & have a different perspective!! Just curious!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sdg1871
991 Turbo
267
12-24-2015 12:22 PM
Josh/AWE
991 Turbo
31
09-28-2015 03:55 PM
TitanMotorsport
Nissan GTR
1
09-23-2015 03:25 PM