Please provide your 60-130 times
#1
10-29-2006, 12:39 PM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,510
Rep Power: 788 
Please provide your 60-130 times
If you have 60-130 times that you've obtained from either a Racelogic Driftbox or AX-22 GPS based performance computer, and you'd like to have them posted in the list I'm compiling, please provide the graphs in the below linked thread so that I can have them verified and added to the list.
The mph/kph conversion for 60-130 mph is 96.5 - 209.2 kph...and I'll gladly accept those times too.
In the 1st post of the below thread, you'll see that I have already started a small list just below the 1/4 mile trap speeds. I'll need the following information along with the times/graphs:
-Type of computer used (Racelogic, AX-22, etc...)
-Type of car
-Modifications to car
-If TT, AWD or RWD conversion.
Thanks!
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...327#post673327
The mph/kph conversion for 60-130 mph is 96.5 - 209.2 kph...and I'll gladly accept those times too.
In the 1st post of the below thread, you'll see that I have already started a small list just below the 1/4 mile trap speeds. I'll need the following information along with the times/graphs:
-Type of computer used (Racelogic, AX-22, etc...)
-Type of car
-Modifications to car
-If TT, AWD or RWD conversion.
Thanks!
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...327#post673327
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 10-29-2006 at 12:46 PM.
#2
10-29-2006, 03:15 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MPLS, MN USA
Age: 63
Posts: 5,710
Rep Power: 464
2001 996TT
PSI 480 ECU (k-16's), PSI Quiet exhuast (since has been sold)
Stock AWD with 19" tires/wheels
Crap 92 Octane gas (2) shifts
60-130 mph (on my AX-22) verified by the truthkeeper Jean, when I emailed
him my file. (BTW) 160 mph indicated == 159 on AX-22 GPS.
It feels faster but you know how "feelings" are...
PSI 480 ECU (k-16's), PSI Quiet exhuast (since has been sold)
Stock AWD with 19" tires/wheels
Crap 92 Octane gas (2) shifts
60-130 mph (on my AX-22) verified by the truthkeeper Jean, when I emailed
him my file. (BTW) 160 mph indicated == 159 on AX-22 GPS.
It feels faster but you know how "feelings" are...
#3
10-29-2006, 04:44 PM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,510
Rep Power: 788
Originally Posted by WOODTSTER
2001 996TT
PSI 480 ECU (k-16's), PSI Quiet exhuast (since has been sold)
Stock AWD with 19" tires/wheels
Crap 92 Octane gas (2) shifts
60-130 mph (on my AX-22) verified by the truthkeeper Jean, when I emailed
him my file. (BTW) 160 mph indicated == 159 on AX-22 GPS.
It feels faster but you know how "feelings" are...
PSI 480 ECU (k-16's), PSI Quiet exhuast (since has been sold)
Stock AWD with 19" tires/wheels
Crap 92 Octane gas (2) shifts
60-130 mph (on my AX-22) verified by the truthkeeper Jean, when I emailed
him my file. (BTW) 160 mph indicated == 159 on AX-22 GPS.
It feels faster but you know how "feelings" are...
#4
10-30-2006, 08:39 PM
Great thread scott, i have videos of myself doing it now and in 9 second range, but that was wheni was awd and before a few things. Tomorrow i will starting the official test's thanks to Kevin!
#6
10-31-2006, 01:07 AM
Originally Posted by 9.grand
Out of curiosity - are you punching it from a 60mph roll or are you punching it at a lower speed and automatically starting the clock when you pass 60mph?
#7
10-31-2006, 01:09 AM
Originally Posted by iLLM3
How i did it before on all of my videos i went from lets say steady 40mph or 60mph punching it to 1xx.. I found out that the mags and the way everyone does it is to start from a lower seed then start counting at WOT from that point!
Trending Topics
#8
10-31-2006, 01:11 AM
Originally Posted by iLLM3
How i did it before on all of my videos i went from lets say steady 40mph or 60mph punching it to 1xx.. I found out that the mags and the way everyone does it is to start from a lower seed then start counting at WOT from that point!
#9
10-31-2006, 01:20 AM
Originally Posted by 9.grand
Yeah, that's what I was wondering. If you punch it at 60mph then you'll need to brake boost or you'll lose some time while the turbos spool, even on a car without much lag. If you punch it at say 30mph and come blasting by 60mph with full boost and a lot of momentum already built up it'll cut way down on your result times.
#10
10-31-2006, 01:37 AM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,510
Rep Power: 788
Alright....for the sake of consistency, let's say everyone starts full acceleration at 40 mph.
#11
10-31-2006, 02:17 AM
Whatever makes you go faster by 60mph to each his own I guess. I have not tried different ways, I typically get to about 50mph and then slam the throttle.
Videos and stop watches can be all over the place, the accurate way to measure this as a benchmark is through a GPS datalogger. We have seen very often 1 second or more differences between our stop watch/video times and a GPS datalogger.
What does matter is whether it was done with one shift or two and it should be disclosed (it can be seen on the datalogs anyway).
Videos and stop watches can be all over the place, the accurate way to measure this as a benchmark is through a GPS datalogger. We have seen very often 1 second or more differences between our stop watch/video times and a GPS datalogger.
What does matter is whether it was done with one shift or two and it should be disclosed (it can be seen on the datalogs anyway).
#12
10-31-2006, 05:09 AM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,510
Rep Power: 788
Originally Posted by Jean
Whatever makes you go faster by 60mph to each his own I guess. I have not tried different ways, I typically get to about 50mph and then slam the throttle.
Jean - do you recommend everyone starts at 50? I’m totally open to what you guys recommend….I'm only concerned about consistency and accuracy for comparison purposes. I don’t know these data loggers nearly as well some of you guys do, so the more info I get on what’s best…the better.
Videos and stop watches can be all over the place. The accurate way to measure this as a benchmark is through a GPS datalogger. We have seen very often 1 second or more differences between our stop watch/video times and a GPS datalogger.
Agree 100%!
What does matter is whether it was done with one shift or two and it should be disclosed (it can be seen on the datalogs anyway).
I have no problem with disclosing the amount of shifts as added information….but in reality…during a roll-on race between two cars, if one car loses because he had to shift one extra time than the other guy…so be it. He still lost. I just want to see who can go the fastest from 60-130, regardless of how many shifts it takes him.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 10-31-2006 at 05:18 AM.
#13
10-31-2006, 06:10 AM
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
Jean - do you recommend everyone starts at 50?
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
I have no problem with disclosing the amount of shifts as added information….but in reality…during a roll-on race between two cars, if one car loses because he had to shift one extra time than the other guy…so be it. He still lost. I just want to see who can go the fastest from 60-130, regardless of how many shifts it takes him.
I think as long as it is known, it is no issue, however the times will not be comparable to magazines.
#14
10-31-2006, 07:44 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne Beach, Fl
Age: 61
Posts: 1,477
Rep Power: 116
Originally Posted by Jean
Scott, it does not really matter, you will be at a certain RPM at that speed regardless how fast you were coming. It really depepnds on the preferences of each driver.
I agree, if what we want to see only is who does the fastest time, however if we are trying to establish how cars compare HP-wise or compare vs. magazine tests etc. then there needs to be consistency, all Porsche cars will go through 2 gear changes from 60-130mph if they start from zero like a quartermile (996TT will be 2nd-3rd-4th, 993TT will be 3rd, 4th, 5th)
I think as long as it is known, it is no issue, however the times will not be comparable to magazines.
I agree, if what we want to see only is who does the fastest time, however if we are trying to establish how cars compare HP-wise or compare vs. magazine tests etc. then there needs to be consistency, all Porsche cars will go through 2 gear changes from 60-130mph if they start from zero like a quartermile (996TT will be 2nd-3rd-4th, 993TT will be 3rd, 4th, 5th)
I think as long as it is known, it is no issue, however the times will not be comparable to magazines.
Kevin