06 c6ZO6 RUNS 10'S BONE STOCK ON DR'S
#48
I don't know anything about Vetts....
so I need the experts to tell me...
many of us have trapped 127 mph or so... with 1/4 times at 11.5 at best...
granted the TT is heavier by lets say 400 lbs... but the Vett does not have 550 rwhp( at least I dont think so) like we do in order to run 11.5s...
So how does he do it?
Im just comparing it to out TTs... those trap speeds are very very high for a 500 crank HP car. (I think thats what they have stock?).
Im not questioning the fact but rather trying to understand how come they can do it with 100 hp less?
markski
so I need the experts to tell me...
many of us have trapped 127 mph or so... with 1/4 times at 11.5 at best...
granted the TT is heavier by lets say 400 lbs... but the Vett does not have 550 rwhp( at least I dont think so) like we do in order to run 11.5s...
So how does he do it?
Im just comparing it to out TTs... those trap speeds are very very high for a 500 crank HP car. (I think thats what they have stock?).
Im not questioning the fact but rather trying to understand how come they can do it with 100 hp less?
markski
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
#49
have had 6 corvetts all at the same time all of which where 69 or older.. loved em all, but the new ones where then and now a dime a doz, no one gets excited over an old zr1 nor will they about a reg vett few people can tell the diff in the zo6 ...by looking.. love the zo6 but see two or three a week very few tts i'll take the tt every time thank you
#50
Originally Posted by MARKSKI
I don't know anything about Vetts....
so I need the experts to tell me...
many of us have trapped 127 mph or so... with 1/4 times at 11.5 at best...
granted the TT is heavier by lets say 400 lbs... but the Vett does not have 550 rwhp( at least I dont think so) like we do in order to run 11.5s...
So how does he do it?
Im just comparing it to out TTs... those trap speeds are very very high for a 500 crank HP car. (I think thats what they have stock?).
Im not questioning the fact but rather trying to understand how come they can do it with 100 hp less?
markski
so I need the experts to tell me...
many of us have trapped 127 mph or so... with 1/4 times at 11.5 at best...
granted the TT is heavier by lets say 400 lbs... but the Vett does not have 550 rwhp( at least I dont think so) like we do in order to run 11.5s...
So how does he do it?
Im just comparing it to out TTs... those trap speeds are very very high for a 500 crank HP car. (I think thats what they have stock?).
Im not questioning the fact but rather trying to understand how come they can do it with 100 hp less?
markski
#51
Anyone else notice the evidence of a Hurst Roll Control Line-Lock?
Nice enhancement in the water burn-out phase. Also helps in taking up driveline slack before launch----kinder to components.
Another great application is for 6-speed owners who are poor drivers and live in San Fran.
Nice enhancement in the water burn-out phase. Also helps in taking up driveline slack before launch----kinder to components.
Another great application is for 6-speed owners who are poor drivers and live in San Fran.
#52
My understanding is that the Z06 is underrated by a good 30HP+. I've heard of cars Dynoing at 470 WHP. That's like 530+ with 12.5% drivetrain loss.
Lighter weight, N/A torque (easier to modulate) and more emphasis on a launcheable car makes a big difference. IMO the launch factor of the TT is very disapointing. All they needed was to design out some wheel hop and lenghten first gear (or give us more revs).
Lighter weight, N/A torque (easier to modulate) and more emphasis on a launcheable car makes a big difference. IMO the launch factor of the TT is very disapointing. All they needed was to design out some wheel hop and lenghten first gear (or give us more revs).
Originally Posted by MARKSKI
I don't know anything about Vetts....
so I need the experts to tell me...
many of us have trapped 127 mph or so... with 1/4 times at 11.5 at best...
granted the TT is heavier by lets say 400 lbs... but the Vett does not have 550 rwhp( at least I dont think so) like we do in order to run 11.5s...
So how does he do it?
Im just comparing it to out TTs... those trap speeds are very very high for a 500 crank HP car. (I think thats what they have stock?).
Im not questioning the fact but rather trying to understand how come they can do it with 100 hp less?
markski
so I need the experts to tell me...
many of us have trapped 127 mph or so... with 1/4 times at 11.5 at best...
granted the TT is heavier by lets say 400 lbs... but the Vett does not have 550 rwhp( at least I dont think so) like we do in order to run 11.5s...
So how does he do it?
Im just comparing it to out TTs... those trap speeds are very very high for a 500 crank HP car. (I think thats what they have stock?).
Im not questioning the fact but rather trying to understand how come they can do it with 100 hp less?
markski
#53
Originally Posted by tblackj
Thats not what my 1/4 mile times would look like in that car.
I'm about to have to take my 1500 mile Z06 to the shop for a new clutch. Mine is fried already. Other than that, and all the codes I've thrown, it's been a blast to drive... But I havn't lost my roof yet!!!! WOOT!
I'm about to have to take my 1500 mile Z06 to the shop for a new clutch. Mine is fried already. Other than that, and all the codes I've thrown, it's been a blast to drive... But I havn't lost my roof yet!!!! WOOT!
About the chick thing, what i found surprising is that AOL had a feature of top 5 chick magnet cars, 996TT was one of them i was like wtf
#54
Originally Posted by iLLM3
that sucks man :/
About the chick thing, what i found surprising is that AOL had a feature of top 5 chick magnet cars, 996TT was one of them i was like wtf
About the chick thing, what i found surprising is that AOL had a feature of top 5 chick magnet cars, 996TT was one of them i was like wtf
#55
Originally Posted by Al Norton
Anyone else notice the evidence of a Hurst Roll Control Line-Lock?
Another great application is for 6-speed owners who are poor drivers and live in San Fran.
Another great application is for 6-speed owners who are poor drivers and live in San Fran.
#56
Originally Posted by tblackj
Like I said, its the car all the girls want to ride in. They think the Vette looks too mean but the Porsche looks "cute".
#58
It looks like he's using a line locker but then he might just be very good with left foot brake control. Use of a line locker is not strictly bone stock, but this guy is a talented drag racer flat out.
#59
#60
Originally Posted by Al Norton
Anyone else notice the evidence of a Hurst Roll Control Line-Lock?
Nice enhancement in the water burn-out phase. Also helps in taking up driveline slack before launch----kinder to components.
Another great application is for 6-speed owners who are poor drivers and live in San Fran.
Nice enhancement in the water burn-out phase. Also helps in taking up driveline slack before launch----kinder to components.
Another great application is for 6-speed owners who are poor drivers and live in San Fran.
Originally Posted by MrBlonde
It looks like he's using a line locker but then he might just be very good with left foot brake control. Use of a line locker is not strictly bone stock, but this guy is a talented drag racer flat out.
If you're interested, he even did a write-up on burn out techniques without line lock... pretty common procedure. http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show....php?t=1468972