Owners of the GT750 kits, can you post up a dyno sheet?
#20
Originally Posted by jags911tt
Im in the process of deciding what to do next on my car.
#21
Originally Posted by silversurfer
Do you have any dyno sheets from how your car is currently set up? It would be an easy way to compare it to the 750 sheet that was previously posted.
I'm not trying to compare my gt700 to a gt750. I was putting out the info for the guy who started the thread. And Joes has alot more than a gt750 right Joe?
Jag
#22
I have experienced a GT750 in the real world conditions. I have been passenger and drove stock, stg1-4, GT640, GT700 and GT750. Each step is a noticible difference. A GT700 will walk my GT640. The GT750 was an ANIMAL!! After riding passenger at EVOMS I am able to say that there is a noticible difference between a GT750 and GT700. That car was extremely fast!!
#23
Originally Posted by chinitowest
I have experienced a GT750 in the real world conditions. I have been passenger and drove stock, stg1-4, GT640, GT700 and GT750. Each step is a noticible difference. A GT700 will walk my GT640. The GT750 was an ANIMAL!! After riding passenger at EVOMS I am able to say that there is a noticible difference between a GT750 and GT700. That car was extremely fast!!
#24
Originally Posted by jags911tt
Ever tried a gt800 frm a gt700?
#25
Since I got the Performance box... Im starting to guage performace more based on these runs... instead the "butt test"... thats relative and not really accurate...
100Km to 300KM will be a great test... with 2 to 3 shifts...
60 to 130 miles is hard to compare becasue some cars liek the eovms do it in one gear and others with bigger turbos do it in 2 gears...
just my opinion...
markski
100Km to 300KM will be a great test... with 2 to 3 shifts...
60 to 130 miles is hard to compare becasue some cars liek the eovms do it in one gear and others with bigger turbos do it in 2 gears...
just my opinion...
markski
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
#26
Originally Posted by MARKSKI
Since I got the Performance box... Im starting to guage performace more based on these runs... instead the "butt test"... thats relative and not really accurate...
100Km to 300KM will be a great test... with 2 to 3 shifts...
60 to 130 miles is hard to compare becasue some cars liek the eovms do it in one gear and others with bigger turbos do it in 2 gears...
just my opinion...
markski
100Km to 300KM will be a great test... with 2 to 3 shifts...
60 to 130 miles is hard to compare becasue some cars liek the eovms do it in one gear and others with bigger turbos do it in 2 gears...
just my opinion...
markski
Mark i love and respect your commitment to this endeavor to better our cars.. dont take this any differently..
Last edited by sy996tt; 01-30-2007 at 02:11 AM.
#27
I agree agree Sonny....
We need more GPS data... different cars different set ups... we learn from it.
after doing my 4th gear pull I realized that I could not do it...
I need it to go 3 and 4... I would liek to see a evoms gt700 or 800 do a 3rd and 4th gear pull...
Also I had the PSM ON... did you guys????
best,
mark
We need more GPS data... different cars different set ups... we learn from it.
after doing my 4th gear pull I realized that I could not do it...
I need it to go 3 and 4... I would liek to see a evoms gt700 or 800 do a 3rd and 4th gear pull...
Also I had the PSM ON... did you guys????
best,
mark
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
#28
Originally Posted by MARKSKI
I agree agree Sonny....
We need more GPS data... different cars different set ups... we learn from it.
We need more GPS data... different cars different set ups... we learn from it.
may i respectfully suggest 0-300kmh (187mph) as a useful benchmark? for one, it lessens the effect of variances in grip off the line (or lack thereof,) and is also a good test of top-end grunt. once you're anywhere above 500-600HP in a car, you can really only truly maximize the power once well into three digits.
secondly, it is a benchmark that allows comparison with all sorts of other cars, on both sides of the atlantic, and even elsewhere. everything from the Macca F1 to the Enzo to the CGT to the Veyron, and tuner cars like Rufs and Mantheys and Gemballas, and even ballistic drag Skylines out of Japan, have all used 0-300kmh as a measure.
some 0-300 times for reference (i've rounded #'s off):
10 secs - Benetton Formula One car
13 secs - Veilside Skyline GT-R
17 secs - Audi R8 LeMans racecar
18 secs - Bugatti Veyron
21 secs - 9ff 911 Turbo Cab
26 secs - Ferrari Enzo
30 secs - Ferrari 599
32 secs - LP640 Murcielago
34 secs - Carrera GT
41 secs - 996 GT2
41 secs - 997 Turbo
42 secs - C6 Z06
sorry for the hijack...13 secs - Veilside Skyline GT-R
17 secs - Audi R8 LeMans racecar
18 secs - Bugatti Veyron
21 secs - 9ff 911 Turbo Cab
26 secs - Ferrari Enzo
30 secs - Ferrari 599
32 secs - LP640 Murcielago
34 secs - Carrera GT
41 secs - 996 GT2
41 secs - 997 Turbo
42 secs - C6 Z06
cheers!
#29
WOW that Skyline must be insane! Any more info on that beast? F1 does it in 10 seconds, that would snap your neck a little!
I think as far as tuners go the cream has risen to the top. The best is purely subjective and tuners like Evoms, Proto and UMW all have very happy customers which is the ultimate end result of your success or failure.
I do enjoy reading all the different measurements you guys come up with but at the end of the day the ONLY REAL way to measure one car against another is to run side by side in the REAL WORLD. Not to say it isn't fun to see all the numbers. Those guys across the pond seem to do it right when they rent an airstrip and run the cars against each other.
Wish it was easier for us to that in the States.
Keep up the good work everyone!
I think as far as tuners go the cream has risen to the top. The best is purely subjective and tuners like Evoms, Proto and UMW all have very happy customers which is the ultimate end result of your success or failure.
I do enjoy reading all the different measurements you guys come up with but at the end of the day the ONLY REAL way to measure one car against another is to run side by side in the REAL WORLD. Not to say it isn't fun to see all the numbers. Those guys across the pond seem to do it right when they rent an airstrip and run the cars against each other.
Wish it was easier for us to that in the States.
Keep up the good work everyone!
#30
Originally Posted by buddyg
I do enjoy reading all the different measurements you guys come up with but at the end of the day the ONLY REAL way to measure one car against another is to run side by side in the REAL WORLD. Not to say it isn't fun to see all the numbers. Those guys across the pond seem to do it right when they rent an airstrip and run the cars against each other.
Wish it was easier for us to that in the States.
Wish it was easier for us to that in the States.