How to adjust Wastegate rods?
#31
1+ ...my OEM clutch is gone ..... Stephen at IA hooked my up with upgrades headers and EVO WG...
Can I install the new WG without installing the new GT1 Clutch?
Can I install the new WG without installing the new GT1 Clutch?
#32
Originally Posted by Pierre996TT
1+ ...my OEM clutch is gone ..... Stephen at IA hooked my up with upgrades headers and EVO WG...
Can I install the new WG without installing the new GT1 Clutch?
Can I install the new WG without installing the new GT1 Clutch?
#33
Originally Posted by smistry007
is there any benefit of tightening up the waste gates in a K16 car? I already boost 0.9bar with occasional spikes to 1.1. Would there be less lag?
Thanks
Sameer
Thanks
Sameer
#34
Hey Guys,
I linked to this thread through the recent wastegate thread since I am in the midst of tweaking this mod as well. I figured I would shed some light on this topic for anyone interested in the theory.....
First off, to reiterate, a pressure gage and source of pressure is essential. The device that John D. (Hey John!) posted a picture of is a great tool and cheap to make. Although I haven't gone through the process yet, I would concur with two posters that the gates should start to crack at about 12psi for GIAC Stage 4 programming (approx. 600 crank hp and K24's).
Some definitions......
1 bar equals the standardized atmospheric pressure at sea level = 14.5 psi.
0.7 bar = 10.15 psi
0.8 bar = 11.60 psi
0.9 bar = 13.05 psi
1.0 bar = 14.50 psi
1.1 bar = 15.95 psi
1.2 bar = 17.40 psi
1.3 bar = 18.85 psi
1.4 bar = 20.30 psi
We all know the turbos, regardless of size, need to bleed off excess boost that the intake system and programming cannot handle. This is where the springs come into play. They are very simply the means to keep the lip shut. The lid is the actual wastegate.
Springs are very simple and function according to:
F = (k) times (x)
F = force on spring
k = spring constant (varies with stiffness of spring)
x = displacement of spring
Remember algebra???!!! LOL
Example...
F = 100 pounds
k = 100 pounds/inch
x = 1 inch for every 100 pounds applied to it.
For that example, 100 pounds will depress the spring 1 inch, 200 pounds depresses the spring 2 inches, 300 pounds depresses the spring 3 inches, etc. But, remember, adding more and more force will eventually compress the spring completely leaving no travel.
This works with all springs except progressive springs.
So, the point of the whole spring upgrade is to allow the spring to be commensurate with the increased boost pressures of aftermarket programming. The apparent problem with the stock spring is that it is designed for a system that is boosting to 0.7 bar or 10.15 psi (see above). With the aftermarket programming, the pressures are upwards of 18.85 psi or 86% higher!! So, you can crank up the stock springs adding resistive force (pretension force) with each crank, however, you are running out of travel at the same time. As you crank the rod nuts tighter and tighter, you are compressing the spring and eliminating more and more travel. This will eventually, if overdone, limit the opening size of the wastgate since the spring doesn't have any more travel to allow it to open farther. Hence, stiffer springs are necessary to move the working range into something appropriate for the higher boost pressures.
I haven't done it yet, but if someone has some time on their hands, I would REALLY like to know the stiffness difference between the stock vs. upgraded springs. The test is simple. Hang a weight on the uninstalled rod mechanism and measure the movement of the rod. Do this for the stock spring and for the upgraded spring. Post the results here. Remember, the weight cannot bottom out the spring. It has to be appropriately weighted to allow the spring to work in its usable range. They can be different weights. Just record the weight and distance the rod moved for both circumstances, stock vs. upgrade.
OK, I guess that is enough of that!!! LOL
I linked to this thread through the recent wastegate thread since I am in the midst of tweaking this mod as well. I figured I would shed some light on this topic for anyone interested in the theory.....
First off, to reiterate, a pressure gage and source of pressure is essential. The device that John D. (Hey John!) posted a picture of is a great tool and cheap to make. Although I haven't gone through the process yet, I would concur with two posters that the gates should start to crack at about 12psi for GIAC Stage 4 programming (approx. 600 crank hp and K24's).
Some definitions......
1 bar equals the standardized atmospheric pressure at sea level = 14.5 psi.
0.7 bar = 10.15 psi
0.8 bar = 11.60 psi
0.9 bar = 13.05 psi
1.0 bar = 14.50 psi
1.1 bar = 15.95 psi
1.2 bar = 17.40 psi
1.3 bar = 18.85 psi
1.4 bar = 20.30 psi
We all know the turbos, regardless of size, need to bleed off excess boost that the intake system and programming cannot handle. This is where the springs come into play. They are very simply the means to keep the lip shut. The lid is the actual wastegate.
Springs are very simple and function according to:
F = (k) times (x)
F = force on spring
k = spring constant (varies with stiffness of spring)
x = displacement of spring
Remember algebra???!!! LOL
Example...
F = 100 pounds
k = 100 pounds/inch
x = 1 inch for every 100 pounds applied to it.
For that example, 100 pounds will depress the spring 1 inch, 200 pounds depresses the spring 2 inches, 300 pounds depresses the spring 3 inches, etc. But, remember, adding more and more force will eventually compress the spring completely leaving no travel.
This works with all springs except progressive springs.
So, the point of the whole spring upgrade is to allow the spring to be commensurate with the increased boost pressures of aftermarket programming. The apparent problem with the stock spring is that it is designed for a system that is boosting to 0.7 bar or 10.15 psi (see above). With the aftermarket programming, the pressures are upwards of 18.85 psi or 86% higher!! So, you can crank up the stock springs adding resistive force (pretension force) with each crank, however, you are running out of travel at the same time. As you crank the rod nuts tighter and tighter, you are compressing the spring and eliminating more and more travel. This will eventually, if overdone, limit the opening size of the wastgate since the spring doesn't have any more travel to allow it to open farther. Hence, stiffer springs are necessary to move the working range into something appropriate for the higher boost pressures.
I haven't done it yet, but if someone has some time on their hands, I would REALLY like to know the stiffness difference between the stock vs. upgraded springs. The test is simple. Hang a weight on the uninstalled rod mechanism and measure the movement of the rod. Do this for the stock spring and for the upgraded spring. Post the results here. Remember, the weight cannot bottom out the spring. It has to be appropriately weighted to allow the spring to work in its usable range. They can be different weights. Just record the weight and distance the rod moved for both circumstances, stock vs. upgrade.
OK, I guess that is enough of that!!! LOL
Last edited by KPV; 07-09-2007 at 01:50 PM.
#37
Originally Posted by oak
I have stock version adjusted to 1.1-1.2 and they are fine.
#38
I have my stock wg's adjusted to 1.1-1.2 @ colder climates and never has gone limp. not too sure about the orton prg. you can probably crank it upto 1.1 and still be safe. I don't think you will see more boost but probably quicker boost with the europipe. if they are 100 cell you will notice improved quicker boost.
I know of a quite a few people that have struggled to dial-in the evo wg's with ob limp issues. once they have figured that they need to crank down the evo wgs to prevent ob they all have mentioned that it was a waste. no gain.
I know of a quite a few people that have struggled to dial-in the evo wg's with ob limp issues. once they have figured that they need to crank down the evo wgs to prevent ob they all have mentioned that it was a waste. no gain.
#39
Do you remember how many turns you made (arm nut) to accomplish that boost when you adjusted the WG's? My program seems to compensate for colder temps. It will not hit 1 bar unless the engine water temp is over 180. When it hits 180 WT, it hits 1 solid bar immediately. In the colder weather (60 below), the engine will struggle to get to 180 and the boost is regulated (.9 to 1 bar spike). Could Orton have a limp proof program depending on temp?
Last edited by 9Eleven; 07-09-2007 at 06:31 PM.
#40
Originally Posted by oak
I know of a quite a few people that have struggled to dial-in the evo wg's with ob limp issues. once they have figured that they need to crank down the evo wgs to prevent ob they all have mentioned that it was a waste. no gain.
FWIW, mine are set to hold 1.1 with a spike of 1.2. Aside from the B&M SSK, the EVO WG's are the best bang for the buck I have invested so far.
#41
Originally Posted by Bodybag
Not at all the case with my REVO tuned GT2. The stock springs will bleed boost earlier regardless of how much they are cranked down to hold at full boost. Once I installed EVO WG's I consistantly get noticably higher boost at part throttle and at lower RPM than with stock WG's. That IS the effect of the heavy springs in the EVO WG's no matter how far you "crank them down" to avoid overboost.
FWIW, mine are set to hold 1.1 with a spike of 1.2. Aside from the B&M SSK, the EVO WG's are the best bang for the buck I have invested so far.
FWIW, mine are set to hold 1.1 with a spike of 1.2. Aside from the B&M SSK, the EVO WG's are the best bang for the buck I have invested so far.
Last edited by 9Eleven; 07-09-2007 at 06:40 PM.
#42
Originally Posted by 9Eleven
...Was it difficult to get them both adjusted properly after the installation?
Even if you're new exhaust puts a smile on your face, I strongly suggest new WG's too. They aren't expensive, and will give you better part throttle response and low RPM boost.
#43
bodybag, you are pretty lucky with the revo prg. you are one of the very few that don't have an evo prg and not have an ob situation. not so with my stock springs they hold fine up to 1.1-1.2 and have no problems with ob. umw still need to be dialed in, but still doesn't guarantee ob problems.
#45
Originally Posted by Bodybag
Do it with a pressure tester. There is no way to accurately and evenly adjust them without using a pressure tester.
Once you've got a tester and are ready to adjust them, set them up so that the watesgate begins to crack once they hit 12psi. That'll keep you from overboosting and have the boost set to a safe 1.2 max.
Adjusting rod length with the number of turns method will get you close, but you need to do the final adjustment with a pressure tester.
Once you've got a tester and are ready to adjust them, set them up so that the watesgate begins to crack once they hit 12psi. That'll keep you from overboosting and have the boost set to a safe 1.2 max.
Adjusting rod length with the number of turns method will get you close, but you need to do the final adjustment with a pressure tester.