996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

From OEM IC -> EVO IC's with K24 more Turbo lag?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-27-2007, 09:02 PM
Pierre996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lo Barnechea & Viņa del Mar
Age: 52
Posts: 1,036
Rep Power: 64
Pierre996TT has a spectacular aura aboutPierre996TT has a spectacular aura aboutPierre996TT has a spectacular aura about
Question From OEM IC -> EVO IC's with K24 more Turbo lag?

Hello,

I currently have the OEM (no-X50) ICs, with K24, GIAC Stage 4, EVO WG 1.2 bar to the red line…etc


I do not track the car and I really do not want to increase the turbo lag in fact decrease it. I am concern on reduce the pressure installing such a big IC as well as not justifying the $$ for no track use.

Can somebody tell me or share some of your experience about EVO ClubSport Intercoolers?

Does the lag decreases?



Thanks!
 
  #2  
Old 05-28-2007, 05:13 PM
Pierre996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lo Barnechea & Viņa del Mar
Age: 52
Posts: 1,036
Rep Power: 64
Pierre996TT has a spectacular aura aboutPierre996TT has a spectacular aura aboutPierre996TT has a spectacular aura about
Question

anyone...lets put it this way:

Would EVO intercooler create less lag over GT2/non X50 intercoolers?

 
  #3  
Old 05-28-2007, 05:45 PM
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CHICAGO
Age: 55
Posts: 9,720
Rep Power: 601
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Better ICs have nothing to do with decreasing LAG.
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




  #4  
Old 05-28-2007, 05:55 PM
robmd99's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Texas
Age: 58
Posts: 3,597
Rep Power: 203
robmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond repute
Hi
You need those IC.. if you look at all High Performance Cars that are turbocharged they all have huge IC.. Supras using 4.5 inch by 30inches.. Suby's and Evo just for an example :-) I use the EVOMS and I must say they are a great product!
Robert
 
  #5  
Old 05-28-2007, 05:57 PM
wross996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Age: 64
Posts: 4,661
Rep Power: 252
wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !
What Mark said...lag is about time it takes to get enough pressure built up to turn the turbos...the bigger the turbos the longer it takes to get that boost built up. The ICs will help to cool the air flowing to the turbo...therefore they will (may) make more power.
 

Last edited by wross996TT; 05-28-2007 at 05:59 PM.
  #6  
Old 05-28-2007, 06:16 PM
Pierre996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lo Barnechea & Viņa del Mar
Age: 52
Posts: 1,036
Rep Power: 64
Pierre996TT has a spectacular aura aboutPierre996TT has a spectacular aura aboutPierre996TT has a spectacular aura about
Thanks!,

Thus, if the EVO IC have better design an the air can flow better:

Will this make the turbos spool fater?

VS.

More volume (bigger IC) will reduce pressure on the system -> making more lag?
 
  #7  
Old 05-28-2007, 06:21 PM
SallyMobile's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NV
Posts: 981
Rep Power: 59
SallyMobile is a jewel in the roughSallyMobile is a jewel in the roughSallyMobile is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by Pierre996TT
Thanks!,

Thus, if the EVO IC have better design an the air can flow better:

Will this make the turbos spool fater?

VS.

More volume (bigger IC) will reduce pressure on the system -> making more lag?
In theory, this is true. In practice, the difference in volume would have to be absolutely HUGE for you to feel a difference. A pair of K16's can fully pressurize the difference in volumes between the stock and EVOMS intercoolers in milliseconds. Now, if we're talking about intercoolers with internal volumes several times the size of your gas tank, then there may be a difference you can feel.
 
  #8  
Old 05-28-2007, 06:49 PM
Pierre996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lo Barnechea & Viņa del Mar
Age: 52
Posts: 1,036
Rep Power: 64
Pierre996TT has a spectacular aura aboutPierre996TT has a spectacular aura aboutPierre996TT has a spectacular aura about
Thumbs up

I appreciated,

thus, turbo lag is probable in 75% on turbine design/dimension + 10% air that feeds the turbos + 10% back pressure hot turbine + 5% gases going to the hot turbine....something like that.

and

boost response (no turbo lag... very different) will be increase for better design, which in case of GT2/non X50 IC in opposition to the EVO IC bigger volume will not affect the pressure.

now, I can clarify my inquiry

Thanks for your input …
 

Last edited by Pierre996TT; 05-28-2007 at 06:52 PM.
  #9  
Old 05-28-2007, 06:55 PM
ukgt2's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 75
Rep Power: 29
ukgt2 is a splendid one to beholdukgt2 is a splendid one to beholdukgt2 is a splendid one to beholdukgt2 is a splendid one to beholdukgt2 is a splendid one to beholdukgt2 is a splendid one to beholdukgt2 is a splendid one to behold
Sorry to hijack your thread pier,

Had to say your car looks awsome!!

Are you running an et25 offset on the rear or et52 with spacers?

Thanks

Andy
 
  #10  
Old 05-28-2007, 07:13 PM
Pierre996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lo Barnechea & Viņa del Mar
Age: 52
Posts: 1,036
Rep Power: 64
Pierre996TT has a spectacular aura aboutPierre996TT has a spectacular aura aboutPierre996TT has a spectacular aura about
Originally Posted by ukgt2
Sorry to hijack your thread pier,

Had to say your car looks awsome!!

Are you running an et25 offset on the rear or et52 with spacers?

Thanks

Andy
Thanks

no spacers...and just 19' Techart Formulas for a 996TT

Best
 
  #11  
Old 05-29-2007, 08:35 AM
Dr_jitsu's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,083
Rep Power: 671
Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !
Pierre,

You PMed me about the lag and I must say that you are way too concerened about lag. There will be no extra lag. You absolutely need to upgrade your IC's and hoses at your power level. Do you really want to risk many thousands of dollars in damage to your turbos and engine, because that is what you are doing w/ a stage 4 on OEM IC's.

Also, your hoses WILL pop.

You will only see a slight increase in performance but a vast improvement in reliability.
 
  #12  
Old 05-29-2007, 08:53 AM
oak's Avatar
oak
oak is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: So Bay, LA
Posts: 2,741
Rep Power: 141
oak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud of
no you don't need bigger IC, you are fine with what you have.
 
  #13  
Old 05-29-2007, 09:35 AM
WOODTSTER's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MPLS, MN USA
Age: 63
Posts: 5,710
Rep Power: 464
WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !
Oak,

Even running 1.2 bar with stage 4 program?
I would think one would want more efficient intercoolers, no?

MK
 
  #14  
Old 05-29-2007, 09:43 AM
msindi's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dubai, UAE + London, UK
Age: 44
Posts: 8,395
Rep Power: 357
msindi is infamous around these parts
I think stock intercoolers don't do with K24s...Which is why X50/GT2 have bigger ones.

Maybe you can find a pair of X50 ICs from someone who upgraded and pick those up for cheaper than a new pair...Just a thought
 
  #15  
Old 05-29-2007, 12:55 PM
oak's Avatar
oak
oak is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: So Bay, LA
Posts: 2,741
Rep Power: 141
oak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud of
are you exeriencing any excessive heat soak? what is your average ambient temp when driving your turbo on boost?
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: From OEM IC -> EVO IC's with K24 more Turbo lag?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:50 PM.