996TT Stage 1 vs. Lamborgini Gallardo ?
#17
06-03-2007 | 08:56 PM
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,710
From: MPLS, MN USA
Rep Power: 464
Scott,
With all due respect, and after throwing out the performance of your old
stage 1 car (fastest ever in the quarter, I believe),
I had an "average stage 1 car" PSI ECU, exhuast and did multiple 60-130
mph runs and never got it under 10.96 (slow shifts). Let's say someone
could run a low 10 second 60-130; The new E-gear Gallardo with
higher horsepower and a fancy exhuast should handily beat this time.
With all due respect, and after throwing out the performance of your old
stage 1 car (fastest ever in the quarter, I believe),
I had an "average stage 1 car" PSI ECU, exhuast and did multiple 60-130
mph runs and never got it under 10.96 (slow shifts). Let's say someone
could run a low 10 second 60-130; The new E-gear Gallardo with
higher horsepower and a fancy exhuast should handily beat this time.
#19
06-03-2007 | 09:24 PM
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,510
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 788
Here are road tests of a 2001 996TT and 520 HP Gallardo SE, both from Sport Auto.
The 996TT runs 0-200 kph in 14.6 and the SE runs it in 14.4.
100-200 kph for the TT is 10.4 and 100-200 for the SE is 10.1. The SE is barely faster than a stock TT...just like it shows in the video I posted.
996TT
http://www.einszweidrei.de/porsche/996turbost2000-1.htm
520 HP Gallardo SE
http://www.einszweidrei.de/lambo/gallardose2005-1.htm
The Gallardo just isn't a very fast car, guys. Truth is...none of the of the Lambos are all that quick, relative to thier HP.
The 996TT runs 0-200 kph in 14.6 and the SE runs it in 14.4.
100-200 kph for the TT is 10.4 and 100-200 for the SE is 10.1. The SE is barely faster than a stock TT...just like it shows in the video I posted.
996TT
http://www.einszweidrei.de/porsche/996turbost2000-1.htm
520 HP Gallardo SE
http://www.einszweidrei.de/lambo/gallardose2005-1.htm
The Gallardo just isn't a very fast car, guys. Truth is...none of the of the Lambos are all that quick, relative to thier HP.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 06-04-2007 at 07:03 AM.
#21
06-03-2007 | 09:32 PM
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,510
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 788
Originally Posted by WOODTSTER
Scott,
With all due respect, and after throwing out the performance of your old
stage 1 car (fastest ever in the quarter, I believe),
I had an "average stage 1 car" PSI ECU, exhuast and did multiple 60-130
mph runs and never got it under 10.96 (slow shifts). Let's say someone
could run a low 10 second 60-130; The new E-gear Gallardo with
higher horsepower and a fancy exhuast should handily beat this time.
With all due respect, and after throwing out the performance of your old
stage 1 car (fastest ever in the quarter, I believe),
I had an "average stage 1 car" PSI ECU, exhuast and did multiple 60-130
mph runs and never got it under 10.96 (slow shifts). Let's say someone
could run a low 10 second 60-130; The new E-gear Gallardo with
higher horsepower and a fancy exhuast should handily beat this time.
I already have 60-130 times for both a Gallardo SE and a Murcielago listed on the 60-130 list. They are as follows:
9.5 - Ferrari F430
10.9 - Lamborghini Murcielago
11.7 - Ferrari Challenge Stradale
12.1 - Lamborghini Gallardo
10.9 - Lamborghini Murcielago
11.7 - Ferrari Challenge Stradale
12.1 - Lamborghini Gallardo
#23
06-03-2007 | 10:18 PM
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,083
From: Texas
Rep Power: 671
Derboost,
In good conditions a stage 4 on pump should run in the high 7's. W/ the race file and race gas, low to mid 7's. I ran a 7.7 in a serious headwind and a stage 4 w/ the race file is only about half a step behind my car.
In good conditions a stage 4 on pump should run in the high 7's. W/ the race file and race gas, low to mid 7's. I ran a 7.7 in a serious headwind and a stage 4 w/ the race file is only about half a step behind my car.
#25
06-04-2007 | 08:22 AM
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,015
From: Chicago
Rep Power: 101
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
Looks like its time to break out the vids:
Here is a stock 996TT vs a stock Gallardo:
http://media.putfile.com/Stock-996TT-vs-Gallardo
And here is a EVOMS Stage 2 vs same Gallardo:
http://media.putfile.com/EVOMS-Stage-2-vs-Gallardo
996 is camera car in both vids.
Here is a stock 996TT vs a stock Gallardo:
http://media.putfile.com/Stock-996TT-vs-Gallardo
And here is a EVOMS Stage 2 vs same Gallardo:
http://media.putfile.com/EVOMS-Stage-2-vs-Gallardo
996 is camera car in both vids.
Is This a joke??? They have the lense cap on!!!!
#26
06-04-2007 | 08:28 AM
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,510
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 788
Originally Posted by club411
Is This a joke??? They have the lense cap on!!!!
I'll PM the original poster of the vids to come in this thread and shed some light.
#28
06-04-2007 | 09:33 AM
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,934
From: ga
Rep Power: 551
Who has the vids of the M6 at the airfield walking away from the gallardo? It takes nothing more than a tune to tie an M6 on the low end, probably tune and exhaust to tie on the high end so I would say the stage 1 should beat the gallardo. Hopefully that sheds some light. Gallardos are really not that fast considering their HP/Weight ratio.
#29
06-05-2007 | 10:02 AM
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 25
From: Bulgaria
Rep Power: 19
Thanks for your replies guys.
His Gallardo is not a SE but a 2004 Gallardo with updated e-gear software which makes the car 520HP(Lamborgini clams the 20HPs). Does this make any difference with the preformance of his car?
On the road where we are going to race the cars the most I can make is 310km/h and he hits 330km/h there, which tells me that he is much faster than me above 200-250km/h.
His Gallardo is not a SE but a 2004 Gallardo with updated e-gear software which makes the car 520HP(Lamborgini clams the 20HPs). Does this make any difference with the preformance of his car?
On the road where we are going to race the cars the most I can make is 310km/h and he hits 330km/h there, which tells me that he is much faster than me above 200-250km/h.
