Video: Proto TT vs BMW M6
#121
06-09-2007, 12:21 PM
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
He's referencing the very flawed maximum TQ assumptions that you posted on the Rennlist 993TT forum, Jean.
Is it my very flawed assumptions, or maybe your lack of understanding of them?
Or maybe is it your very flawed chassis dyno numbers?
Or maybe flawed imagination?
It could be either one, right?
If you don't like my assumptions, just agree to disagree and move on?.
Last edited by Jean; 06-09-2007 at 02:43 PM.
#122
06-09-2007, 03:26 PM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,510
Rep Power: 788 
Originally Posted by Jean
Glad I am providing some laughs for you and your friends across forums.
If you don't like my assumptions, just agree to disagree and move on?.
#125
06-09-2007, 03:33 PM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,510
Rep Power: 788
Originally Posted by Jean
Good! So I am not alone laughing, only mine are at the 1000 lbs ft torque numbers posted and a few other claims
The really funny thing is, your tuner agrees that I'm making that much torque. You might want to try bouncing your BS formulas off of him and see how it far it gets you.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 06-09-2007 at 08:08 PM.
#126
06-09-2007, 03:35 PM
Not sure where my car's performance fits here or what it has to do with this, but remember I am the poor aircooled cousin, I will live dreaming and hoping, until I decide to go to 1.3-1.4 Bar that is.
Edit: Oh you edited and added to your post..
The really funny thing is, your tuner agrees that I'm making that much torque. You might want to try bouncing your BS formulas off of him and see how it far it gets you.
I thought you moved on?
"My" BS formulas are in every automotive physics book around, Todd was shared these long time ago, he absolutely loved them.
Edit: Oh you edited and added to your post..
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
The really funny thing is, your tuner agrees that I'm making that much torque. You might want to try bouncing your BS formulas off of him and see how it far it gets you.
"My" BS formulas are in every automotive physics book around, Todd was shared these long time ago, he absolutely loved them.
Last edited by Jean; 06-10-2007 at 06:02 AM.
#127
06-09-2007, 08:03 PM
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
LOL...I'll be in Iraq from August until next February...so that counts as next year.
#129
06-10-2007, 08:36 AM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,510
Rep Power: 788
Originally Posted by Gabriel
I see. Stay safe mate! I hope it'll be easier there by then. I'll try to think what will be the next stage
#130
06-10-2007, 08:56 AM
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
Not a whole lot, bro. Turbo work, valves and tuning. Thanks.
#131
06-10-2007, 08:59 AM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,510
Rep Power: 788
Originally Posted by KPG
Scott, you are referring to valves in the head I assume. Are you concerned bigger valves will move your tq band higher in the RPM range or are you looking for a bit more on top. Kevin
The setup I have "planned" should either move the tq band lower or keep it the same as it is now, but still give me significantly more power at all boost levels.
I'll know more once my best-friend's car (Peter...who's car is currently at Todd's place) is complete.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 06-10-2007 at 09:03 AM.
#134
06-10-2007, 11:43 AM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,510
Rep Power: 788
Originally Posted by LUISGT3
You left that thing like it was standing still. What is the difference between the PE700 and the PE950 package?
250 HP.