EVOMS 9.67 @ 149.86 - The Video -- Language Advisory - Sorry
#31
06-09-2007, 01:51 AM
**** man, that's fast as *****. Nice flat launch, no drama, just quick. AWESOME, congrats guys! No timeslip though means we have to wait until you throw on a chute and weld in a couple more bars for the "official" 9. That's ****ty that they wouldn't give it to you. How do you know you cut a 1.59 60' if no slip - V-Box?
Funny thing happened last weekend when I went to the track. Some kid in a Subaru screwed up his stage next to me, and although I destroyed him the slip showed he ran an 11-something at 100 with a 0.3 60' time. I guess that's why timeslips tell the whole story...
Markski, Craig, Scott - may I present to you your window of opportunity...
Funny thing happened last weekend when I went to the track. Some kid in a Subaru screwed up his stage next to me, and although I destroyed him the slip showed he ran an 11-something at 100 with a 0.3 60' time. I guess that's why timeslips tell the whole story...
Markski, Craig, Scott - may I present to you your window of opportunity...
Last edited by jimmer23; 06-09-2007 at 02:04 AM.
#33
06-09-2007, 04:41 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MPLS, MN USA
Age: 63
Posts: 5,710
Rep Power: 464 
Good Clean run, no drama,
the car is hella light, the motor does not even sound exotic.
Really good job at execution of a goal.
Muchu congratulations on making your goal.
Now what about this no timeslip thingy???
Joettwint is the new Master P.
the car is hella light, the motor does not even sound exotic.
Really good job at execution of a goal.
Muchu congratulations on making your goal.
Now what about this no timeslip thingy???
Joettwint is the new Master P.
#34
06-09-2007, 06:50 AM
Originally Posted by Todd @ EVO
Guys, Thank you for the all of the props. It is a great day for the 996TT. As we all know, this is an amazing car that we all love. We (EVO) love this car as much as you all do and are proud of what this car can do. As for the particulars of our car, here they are:
Engine: EVO GT800 – 3.6L
Build Time: 2 weeks
Chassis: Moton suspension
Brakes: OEM Porsche Ceramics F/R
Registered and Insured
Lightweight – Not too light, not too heavy
Sorry, no timeslip. We got kicked out and they would not give is the slip. I have the one prior where we ran a 10.11 @ 150 which I will post soon.
The 9.67 run, we cut a 1.59 short time. I will post more details later. Here is a video of the run with no music for those who do not like it.
http://media.putfile.com/EVOMS-967-1
Additionally, please do not read into the lyrics of the music. The video was made by someone who is a big Kid Rock fan as are some of the EVO crew. As soon as we return to AZ, we will be able to release all of the particulars.
Engine: EVO GT800 – 3.6L
Build Time: 2 weeks
Chassis: Moton suspension
Brakes: OEM Porsche Ceramics F/R
Registered and Insured
Lightweight – Not too light, not too heavy
Sorry, no timeslip. We got kicked out and they would not give is the slip. I have the one prior where we ran a 10.11 @ 150 which I will post soon.
The 9.67 run, we cut a 1.59 short time. I will post more details later. Here is a video of the run with no music for those who do not like it.
http://media.putfile.com/EVOMS-967-1
Additionally, please do not read into the lyrics of the music. The video was made by someone who is a big Kid Rock fan as are some of the EVO crew. As soon as we return to AZ, we will be able to release all of the particulars.
#35
06-09-2007, 07:17 AM
Videos are better than timeslips anyday. Timeslips can be fabricated, and/or used for different cars. Videos can not.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 06-09-2007 at 04:09 PM.
#37
06-09-2007, 07:58 AM
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
Videos are better than timeslips anyday. Timselips can be fabricated, and/or used for different cars. Videos can not.
#38
06-09-2007, 08:11 AM
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
Videos are better than timeslips anyday. Timselips can be fabricated, and/or used for different cars. Videos can not.
#39
06-09-2007, 08:11 AM
Originally Posted by jimmer23
**** man, that's fast as *****. Nice flat launch, no drama, just quick. AWESOME, congrats guys! No timeslip though means we have to wait until you throw on a chute and weld in a couple more bars for the "official" 9. That's ****ty that they wouldn't give it to you. How do you know you cut a 1.59 60' if no slip - V-Box?
Funny thing happened last weekend when I went to the track. Some kid in a Subaru screwed up his stage next to me, and although I destroyed him the slip showed he ran an 11-something at 100 with a 0.3 60' time. I guess that's why timeslips tell the whole story...
Markski, Craig, Scott - may I present to you your window of opportunity...
Funny thing happened last weekend when I went to the track. Some kid in a Subaru screwed up his stage next to me, and although I destroyed him the slip showed he ran an 11-something at 100 with a 0.3 60' time. I guess that's why timeslips tell the whole story...
Markski, Craig, Scott - may I present to you your window of opportunity...
#40
06-09-2007, 08:15 AM
Originally Posted by Sonny
Really?? I don't quite see the time in the screen, do you? I just see a car going fast down the straight and bogging at the line, still it this was the case (on the numbers), still a long shot towards the 9.16.
#41
06-09-2007, 08:23 AM
Originally Posted by WOODTSTER
Good Clean run, no drama,
the car is hella light, the motor does not even sound exotic.
Really good job at execution of a goal.
Muchu congratulations on making your goal.
Now what about this no timeslip thingy???
Joettwint is the new Master P.
the car is hella light, the motor does not even sound exotic.
Really good job at execution of a goal.
Muchu congratulations on making your goal.
Now what about this no timeslip thingy???
Joettwint is the new Master P.
#43
06-09-2007, 08:45 AM
Originally Posted by Sonny
Really?? I don't quite see the time in the screen, do you? I just see a car going fast down the straight and bogging at the line, still it this was the case (on the numbers), still a long shot towards the 9.16.
Now why don't you stop being such a childish hater? All you're accomplishing with your immature commentary is making air-cooled owners look bad. A simple; "congrats EVOMS on the great time", will do.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 06-09-2007 at 04:05 PM.
#44
06-09-2007, 08:47 AM
Scott,
We had vid of my 60-130 run at the Supra nats, yet you would not post my results up w/ out the accompanying data (which was, as in this case, unavailable). Is there a double standard here?
In any event, I believe that we have a very significant performance here, and I am going to accept the time. Congratulations on an amazing achievement. My question is, if Scotts and Marks cars are making mid 800 rwhp and haven't broken into nines, how could a GT 800, which, to my understanding makes in the 700 whp range do it?
I know that there is more to a great 1/4 time than just hp, but please explain. Again, I believe the time and offer copious props.... but I want to know exactly how it was achieved. I imagine that weight, gearing, driver skill etc. were factors.
We had vid of my 60-130 run at the Supra nats, yet you would not post my results up w/ out the accompanying data (which was, as in this case, unavailable). Is there a double standard here?
In any event, I believe that we have a very significant performance here, and I am going to accept the time. Congratulations on an amazing achievement. My question is, if Scotts and Marks cars are making mid 800 rwhp and haven't broken into nines, how could a GT 800, which, to my understanding makes in the 700 whp range do it?
I know that there is more to a great 1/4 time than just hp, but please explain. Again, I believe the time and offer copious props.... but I want to know exactly how it was achieved. I imagine that weight, gearing, driver skill etc. were factors.
Last edited by Dr_jitsu; 06-09-2007 at 08:52 AM.
#45
06-09-2007, 08:53 AM
Originally Posted by Dr_jitsu
Scott,
We had vid of my 60-130 run at the Supra nats, yet you would not post my results up w/ out the accompanying data (which was, as in this case, unavailable). Is there a double standard here?
We had vid of my 60-130 run at the Supra nats, yet you would not post my results up w/ out the accompanying data (which was, as in this case, unavailable). Is there a double standard here?
1/4 mile list:
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
All that having been said; if you'd like a 1/4 mile run to be added to the list, please provide proof of the run. Only times from timeslips and/or video (preferably both) will be accepted for this list. No GPS based, datalogger 1/4 mile times will be accepted.
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
PLEASE NOTE: Only GPS based, datalogger times will be accepted for this list. No extrapolated times from 1/4 mile timeslips. Also, all submitted data must be reviewed for accuracy and approved by a Subject Matter Expert (SME) before the time is posted. Current SME's are 'Jean' for AX-22 graphs, and 'KPG' for Driftbox graphs.
In any event, I believe that we have a very significant performance here, and I am going to accept the time. Congratulations on an amazing achievement. My question is, if Scots and Marks cars are making mid 800 rwhp and haven't broken into nines, how could a GT 800, which, to my understanding makes in the 700 whp range do it?
To answer your other question.....less weight makes up for less power.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 06-09-2007 at 04:07 PM.