so you have a stock or N/A E46 M3? Maybe you could do some pulls now to confirm how his car is running?

 

You are 'Taza' on the M3 forums right? No doubt your M is fast if so dude :-) How do you hold up against a built Evo GT/Protomotive 650+/UMW 650+ car?

 

Thank you... Someone with some correct facts. Yes, Jerry's car was gutted, stage 3+, nitrous, C16 race gas (not just 104 IIRC). YOu cannot compare his car to this stage 3, while you also can't compare my car to this car which has bigger turbos and makes over 150HP more than mine did back then... Again thanks for making a statement with the correct facts

As for Scott, your amazing stage 2 is a freak to pull the trap speed it did. You show me stage 2's (ECU, Filter, Exhaust) that are running more than 118, 119, 120.... That is the norm. for a stage 2... My 60' for that 119 run was a 2.2, had it been a 2 or under it would have been 120MPH easy, but since I rolled off the tree like I do a stop light with my grandma in the car to protect the clutch that is what happens... I will also let you know a couple mor facts you are not aware of, like how it was over 85 degrees, and over 80% humidity as it had just rained which also hurts a time (I actually read YOU say 2-3MPH in another thread)... And I wasn't showing how much I had, just letting you know, I don't need you talking down to me by quoting the package I had and calling it the slowest on the forum as if I was as ignorant as you I would build my car faster just to say I am faster... Too bad your **** didn't get any bigger when you got your car back, your car just got faster (guess you didn't realize that was just a saying... ).

I have nothing more for you, you are completely wrong in your facts and the way you said it just proves to me you are a complete idiot. I will continue enjoying my slowest cars, while you continue to be insecure and put other's cars down (yea this isn't the first time).
Best Regards,
Evan

 

There is another member named "Autoaddictions" that hit 11.4 @ 124 mph with his Stage 2 car. He's listed on the 1/4 mile list. I guess he must have a freak as well?

60' time really doesn't have much to do with trap speed. It has much more to do with ET.

I wasn't talking down to you. Just stating that the Stage 2 car in the video is the slowest one I've ever seen or heard of at sea-level. Being that it hasn't proven itself to be any faster than a stock X50 car, I don't feel it's an accurate representation of a true Stage 2 car. Since that particular race video was/is being used as a gauge by owners of S/C M3's, I think it's an very important point to make....whether it hurts your feelings or not.

Exactly how do you know how big my **** is, Evan? I'm curious.

Okay....look, I apologize for my comments, Evan. Upsetting you wasn't my intent. Regardless, please refrain from the name calling. If you can't take part in a debate without resorting to the use of personal attacks in a childish attempt to supplement your points...get out of the debate. I'll only ask you once.

Thanks...and have a nice evening.

 

Maybe you should ban me and that would make it bigger? Maybe deleting the last comment I made, made it bigger? And you call me childish. Do whatever you want Scott, if it makes you feel like a man you can ban me, its much easier to do that than to be wrong...

 

Evan,

I deleted your last post to keep you out of trouble. *To prevent you from being banned.* However, if you keep pressing me, I will absolutely ban you.

This is not about me trying to make anything "bigger" or wanting to "feel like a man". It seems to be more about you trying to act as immaturely as you possibly can. If you truly want to be treated like a child, I'll give you your wish.

As far as me be being wrong...in this particular case, I'm not. The Stage 2 car in that video was not representative of a true Stage 2. Its 1/4 mile trap was no faster than a stock X50 car. The fact that it was your car doesn't matter. I was simply stating a fact...pure and simple.

Now, we can either drop this and move on...or you can keep pushing it. Your call.

 

I am giving you facts which you completely ignore, you write the most irrational things I have ever seen, then threaten to ban me because you are wrong and you can't find a better way,

I don't care Scott, I would rather be banned than have you babysit my posts. I will not participate on a forum that deletes posts. My last one had nothing wrong with it and in no way should have been deleted. Treat me like a child and ban me who really cares Scott... You are obviously very insecure and cannot just be wrong, but then again everyone has seen that from you on other forums. You go around putting everyone elses car down and hype yours up.

Get over yourself, as I said no one cares. I already told you what I am think of you, no need to repeat it. Again if you wanna ban me because your wrong, feel free otherwise stop "threatening" it because I honestly could care less.

 

No, I never threatened to ban you for anything other than using personal attacks...which you are still doing. I stated your car trapped 119 mph..and was not representive of a true Stage 2 car. How is either of those statements wrong, or irrational? Please explain. If you can show me how I am wrong, I'll happily admit my mistake.

Then don't post innappropiate posts, or don't participate. No one is forcing you to be here.

I only put your car down, Evan. No one elses. And it wasn't mean to be personal. I was simply stating that its performance was not indicative of a normal Stage 2 car.

As far as me being "insecure"...I'd say that title lies with the person in this debate that doesn't have enough self-control to stop themselves from using personal attacks.

Obviously you do, since you continue trying to bait me.

Believe me, Evan, at this point...any feelings that you have towards me are mutual. That having been said, *I don't want to ban you*. I just want you to contain your emotions enough to post like an adult. Is that really too much to ask?

 

Very nice run, Awais.

 

Whatever makes you sleep at night scott, like I said, I already stated what I think of you.
I am really done, I am not going to waste time to dealing with.....

 

Okay...right back at ya'.

 

Scott....
I'd have to agree with Evan on this one. My stage 2 trapped 119. My buddies stage 2 trapped 119. Mine had a FVD chip, and my buddies had GIAC. Your car was a freak.
Also.. you have in the past more or less "dissed" cars. Mine included. You gave me a hard time about my M5 being in the 7 sec range(60-130). You swore on this forum it was in the 12's. Then the 9's. But obviously you were wrong. I tried to tell you... but you seemed to love to tell me my car was slow. I couldn't really understand why.... but whatever. It seems like your doing the same with Evan.
jmho.

 

Again, my car was not a freak. No more a freak than the other guy's car that ran 11.44 @ 124. Could you please post timeslips of you and/or your friend's 119 mph runs? Not that I think you're making it up to back-up your buddy Evan's argument or anything...I'm just curious to see the details. Your car was an FVD Stage 2 car as well, right? Hmmm....

Quote:

Originally Posted by phillym5

Also.. you have in the past more or less "dissed" cars. Mine included.

Josh,

What I have done over the years on internet forums, and I have no problem admitting it...is been extremely aggressive in calling out BS. Many, many people like to claim how fast there cars are. I simply ask for proof. When that proof is either not provided, or not sufficient, I state my opinion on the matter (it's only *my* opinion, by the way. It only matters to me, as far as I'm aware.). If someone proves thier claims, I'm usually one of the first ones to congratulate them and give them props on their car.

Believe me, there are a few members on this forum that are far more aggresive than I am when it comes to sniffing out BS. I've actually calmed down in my old age.

Has my honest and very direct approach sometimes pissed people off? Yep. Do I care? Nope. It's just the way I am. I hate BS, and I hate BS'rs. If that comes across as me "dissing people's cars", so be it. I have absolutely no problem with that whatsoever.

Quote:

Originally Posted by phillym5

You gave me a hard time about my M5 being in the 7 sec range(60-130). You swore on this forum it was in the 12's. Then the 9's. But obviously you were wrong. I tried to tell you... but you seemed to love to tell me my car was slow. I couldn't really understand why.... but whatever. It seems like your doing the same with Evan.

Josh, I can't tell if your memory is failing...or if you're just blatently lying right now. But I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, and assume your forgetting how things actually transpired:

I have only discussed your car's 60-130 times one time on this forum. It was when you PM'd me to ask what kind of time I thought you would run. I told you your car would run mid-7's. Not 12's. Not 9's. 7's.

I still have both PM's in my sent items and inbox, and here they are...copied and pasted.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divexxtreme

Wow Josh,

That's a very hard thing to guess at. I would say that your car could hit mid 7's on a good run. That's very close to a Carrera GT.

That PM exchange occurred Jan 30th of this year. Feel free to verify it in your inbox, and also feel free to apologize at your convenience.

 

Yes. Stock e46 M3. That way we would have had an idea that he was making SC STG 3 power. It could have and just be that Awais's care is just nasty fast.

BTW: WTF happened to this thread topic?!

 

That's a good idea; I can even bring my M3 out to do the baseline runs.