0-300 km/h (0-186 mph) times for various cars
#46
07-22-2007, 07:02 PM
Originally Posted by tblackj
They must have tested the Z06 in the snow... thats the only explanation... also the entire run must have been in 5th gear. Started in fifth and never shifted. That must be it.
LOL....I don't think they get your sense of humor, Thomas.
#47
07-22-2007, 07:40 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MPLS, MN USA
Age: 63
Posts: 5,710
Rep Power: 464 
TXturbo,
It is fun to see the extremes, but that is a $300,000 purpose built
(explicitly for that very event), Aeroed, winged, monster motored undrivable
except at that event, Monster Viper. Really Really fast though.
By the way, I am doing the Tx mile in October (hopefully with Markski!!)
Marty K.
It is fun to see the extremes, but that is a $300,000 purpose built
(explicitly for that very event), Aeroed, winged, monster motored undrivable
except at that event, Monster Viper. Really Really fast though.
By the way, I am doing the Tx mile in October (hopefully with Markski!!)
Marty K.
#50
07-25-2007, 07:27 PM
Originally Posted by WOODTSTER
TXturbo,
It is fun to see the extremes, but that is a $300,000 purpose built
(explicitly for that very event), Aeroed, winged, monster motored undrivable
except at that event, Monster Viper. Really Really fast though.
By the way, I am doing the Tx mile in October (hopefully with Markski!!)
Marty K.
It is fun to see the extremes, but that is a $300,000 purpose built
(explicitly for that very event), Aeroed, winged, monster motored undrivable
except at that event, Monster Viper. Really Really fast though.
By the way, I am doing the Tx mile in October (hopefully with Markski!!)
Marty K.
Marty
We can have a protomotive party.. I will be there with a some fellow HPDs.
Robert
#52
07-26-2007, 04:48 AM
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Europe/USA
Posts: 1,987
Rep Power: 101
The itsfun one is not verified IMO, altough it's probably near reality.
I was there as well at the same time and brought back a record of my own.
In a Touareg V10 TDI
And a lot of the other times are not verified.
I'm not saying they are slow cars or lying, but if a Viper does 0-220 mph in 24 secs, I still have no clue what the 0-300 km/h is.
I am sure it would be high on the list, but how high?
wirx's time seems to be from the speedo. Only the 1 mile times seems to be verified. Does he hit true 300 km/h on the run? I don't know.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I think it's unfair to mix times like the Yellowbird one (we can only gueestimate the real time), wirks' etc. with
"real" 0-300 km/h times.
Let's discuss it, I'm open to suggestions.
I was there as well at the same time and brought back a record of my own.
In a Touareg V10 TDI
And a lot of the other times are not verified.
I'm not saying they are slow cars or lying, but if a Viper does 0-220 mph in 24 secs, I still have no clue what the 0-300 km/h is.
I am sure it would be high on the list, but how high?
wirx's time seems to be from the speedo. Only the 1 mile times seems to be verified. Does he hit true 300 km/h on the run? I don't know.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I think it's unfair to mix times like the Yellowbird one (we can only gueestimate the real time), wirks' etc. with
"real" 0-300 km/h times.
Let's discuss it, I'm open to suggestions.
Last edited by Erik; 07-26-2007 at 06:06 AM.
#53
07-26-2007, 06:33 AM
Originally Posted by Erik
The itsfun one is not verified IMO, altough it's probably near reality.
I was there as well at the same time and brought back a record of my own.
In a Touareg V10 TDI
And a lot of the other times are not verified.
I'm not saying they are slow cars or lying, but if a Viper does 0-220 mph in 24 secs, I still have no clue what the 0-300 km/h is.
I am sure it would be high on the list, but how high?
wirx's time seems to be from the speedo. Only the 1 mile times seems to be verified. Does he hit true 300 km/h on the run? I don't know.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I think it's unfair to mix times like the Yellowbird one (we can only gueestimate the real time), wirks' etc. with
"real" 0-300 km/h times.
Let's discuss it, I'm open to suggestions.
I was there as well at the same time and brought back a record of my own.
In a Touareg V10 TDI
And a lot of the other times are not verified.
I'm not saying they are slow cars or lying, but if a Viper does 0-220 mph in 24 secs, I still have no clue what the 0-300 km/h is.
I am sure it would be high on the list, but how high?
wirx's time seems to be from the speedo. Only the 1 mile times seems to be verified. Does he hit true 300 km/h on the run? I don't know.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I think it's unfair to mix times like the Yellowbird one (we can only gueestimate the real time), wirks' etc. with
"real" 0-300 km/h times.
Let's discuss it, I'm open to suggestions.
#54
07-26-2007, 06:54 AM
Is there an error on the SL55 time (32.5 sec) b/c that would make the 493hp car only .6 sec slower than the SL65, and faster than the CGT and Ford GT?
Looking at the SL55 Cd of .30 and frontal area of 25.2 sqft, weight approx 4300lbs with driver, the car needs about 360 hp to overcome the drag at 186 mph, and the Z06 (Cd .34, frontal area 22.3 sqft, 3300 lbs) only requires about 350 hp, the 997TT (Cd .31, frontal area 21.9, 3700 lbs) only requires about 324 hp.
Looking at the SL55 Cd of .30 and frontal area of 25.2 sqft, weight approx 4300lbs with driver, the car needs about 360 hp to overcome the drag at 186 mph, and the Z06 (Cd .34, frontal area 22.3 sqft, 3300 lbs) only requires about 350 hp, the 997TT (Cd .31, frontal area 21.9, 3700 lbs) only requires about 324 hp.
#55
07-26-2007, 06:58 AM
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Europe/USA
Posts: 1,987
Rep Power: 101
Originally Posted by Jean
The Yellowbird however needs no guessing, it is clearly a 0-300kph run tested by R&T..
Speed at 1 mile: 185.8 mph — 4th
Time to 1 mile: 28.6 sec — 7th (tie)
= 298.95 km/h. Have you got anything else? Close but...
#58
07-26-2007, 07:32 AM
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Europe/USA
Posts: 1,987
Rep Power: 101
Originally Posted by jox
If any (respected) magazine has official figures, it goes on the list?
I'm happy to include GPS based performance computers/accelerometers to measure performance as well, just like the 60-130 mph thread.
And we all like videos as well, but a video alone isn't enough.
Bottom line: it has to be reliable.
#59
07-26-2007, 10:12 AM
audi s4 cabrio mtm 450hp - 59 sek
Bentley Continental GT mansory 630 - 60,4sek
Alpina b5 touring 500hp - 52.7 sek
Ferrari 575 m imola 575hp - 41,4 sek
Brabus E 500 v12turbo 640hp - 30,6 sek
Mercedes cls amg carlsson 560hp - 44,8 sek
9ff gt2 843hp engine problems - 25,2 sek sek
Techart 996 turbo cabrio 600hp - 31,9 sek
Bentley Continental GT mansory 630 - 60,4sek
Alpina b5 touring 500hp - 52.7 sek
Ferrari 575 m imola 575hp - 41,4 sek
Brabus E 500 v12turbo 640hp - 30,6 sek
Mercedes cls amg carlsson 560hp - 44,8 sek
9ff gt2 843hp engine problems - 25,2 sek sek
Techart 996 turbo cabrio 600hp - 31,9 sek
#60
07-26-2007, 10:17 AM
Originally Posted by Erik
It would be nice to include it, but this is all I have:
Speed at 1 mile: 185.8 mph — 4th
Time to 1 mile: 28.6 sec — 7th (tie)
= 298.95 km/h. Have you got anything else? Close but...
Speed at 1 mile: 185.8 mph — 4th
Time to 1 mile: 28.6 sec — 7th (tie)
= 298.95 km/h. Have you got anything else? Close but...
I can work out the exact number for you but I don't think it is worth the time honestly. The YB being the benchmark it is, it would be nice to include it despite the 0.6 mph difference
No one ever posts any such RUF datalogs anyway 