0 to 200 mph test by Road and Track
#1
0 to 200 mph test by Road and Track
Here is another acceleration test done by Road and Track and posted by Eclou.
RUF Rt 12
0-200 mph
Time 35.5 seconds
Distance 7385 feet
Engine Twin turbo 3.8 liter DOHC 24 valve flat six, 650 hp.
Curb Weight 3308 lbs
Pounds per Horsepower 5.1
Lingenfelter C6 Corvette
0 - 200 mph
Time 26.5 seconds
Distance 4894 feet
Engine Twin turbo 7.0 liter ohv V-8, 880 hp
Curb Weight 3290 lbs
Pounds per Horsepower 3.7
Bugatti Veyron 16.4
0 - 200 mph
Time 24.2 seconds
Distance 4770 feet
Engine Quad turbo 8.0 liter dohc, 64 valve W-16, 1001 hp
Curb Weight 4470 lbs
Pounds per Horsepower 4.5
Hennessey Venom 1000
Twin Turbo Viper
0 - 200 mph
Time 20.3 seconds
Distance 3488 feet
Engine Twin turbo 8.5 liter ohv V-10, 1100 rwhp
Curb Weight 3458 lbs
Pounds per Horsepower 3.1
Full article can be seen here:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....rticle_id=5680
RUF Rt 12
0-200 mph
Time 35.5 seconds
Distance 7385 feet
Engine Twin turbo 3.8 liter DOHC 24 valve flat six, 650 hp.
Curb Weight 3308 lbs
Pounds per Horsepower 5.1
Lingenfelter C6 Corvette
0 - 200 mph
Time 26.5 seconds
Distance 4894 feet
Engine Twin turbo 7.0 liter ohv V-8, 880 hp
Curb Weight 3290 lbs
Pounds per Horsepower 3.7
Bugatti Veyron 16.4
0 - 200 mph
Time 24.2 seconds
Distance 4770 feet
Engine Quad turbo 8.0 liter dohc, 64 valve W-16, 1001 hp
Curb Weight 4470 lbs
Pounds per Horsepower 4.5
Hennessey Venom 1000
Twin Turbo Viper
0 - 200 mph
Time 20.3 seconds
Distance 3488 feet
Engine Twin turbo 8.5 liter ohv V-10, 1100 rwhp
Curb Weight 3458 lbs
Pounds per Horsepower 3.1
Full article can be seen here:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....rticle_id=5680
#4
If you read the article the Veyron out accelerates the Viper up to 145 mph due mainly to lack of traction for the Viper. The Veyron with AWD and launch control can put all the power to the ground from the start. The Viper has to ramp up boost due to traction issues.
That is why if I build a 1000 hp plus tt in the future I will keep AWD.
That is why if I build a 1000 hp plus tt in the future I will keep AWD.
#6
Originally Posted by buddyg
That is why if I build a 1000 hp plus tt in the future I will keep AWD.
Plus...the Veyron's rear tires are absolutely huge. 365, and custom made for that car. 90%+ of it's traction is coming from those babies alone.
Great post by the way. The poor RT-12 got smoked.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 07-30-2007 at 08:10 PM.
#7
Bud, I don't think our front diff can handle the Hp ..IMHO, I'm going RWD
with a 60/40 diff ...tom
with a 60/40 diff ...tom
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
A RWD TT with the right tires will have essentially as much traction as a Veyron, Buddy. You can't accurately compare a front-engined, RWD car (like the Viper), to a rear-engine, RWD Porsche. The traction difference between the two cars is monumental.
Great post by the way. The poor RT-12 got smoked.
Great post by the way. The poor RT-12 got smoked.
#9
Originally Posted by dgussin1
the veyron would most likely smoke that viper in a real world 50-60mph roll on.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 07-31-2007 at 10:21 AM.
#10
Originally Posted by topgun
Bud, I don't think our front diff can handle the Hp ..IMHO, I'm going RWD
with a 60/40 diff ...tom
with a 60/40 diff ...tom
#11
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
A RWD TT with the right tires will have essentially as much traction as a Veyron, Buddy. You can't accurately compare your average front-engined, RWD car (like the Viper), to a rear-engine, RWD Porsche. The traction difference between the two cars is monumental.
Plus...the Veyron's rear tires are absolutely huge. 365, and custom made for that car. 90%+ of it's traction is coming from those babies alone.
Great post by the way. The poor RT-12 got smoked.
Plus...the Veyron's rear tires are absolutely huge. 365, and custom made for that car. 90%+ of it's traction is coming from those babies alone.
Great post by the way. The poor RT-12 got smoked.
You are correct a rear engined tt has weigh better traction then the front engine Viper. Question for you with your car at 1.5 bars from a dead stop can you get traction or do you have to ease on the throttle? I know you aren't going to dump the clutch from a dead stop at least I wouldn't. Just curious if you have any traction issues at lower speeds?
#12
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
The Veyron went 100-200 mph in 18 seconds. The Viper did it in 13. I think the Viper would kill they Veyron from pretty much any roll-on speed.
#13
Originally Posted by topgun
Bud, I don't think our front diff can handle the Hp ..IMHO, I'm going RWD
with a 60/40 diff ...tom
with a 60/40 diff ...tom
#14
Originally Posted by buddyg
Scott,
You are correct a rear engined tt has weigh better traction then the front engine Viper. Question for you with your car at 1.5 bars from a dead stop can you get traction or do you have to ease on the throttle? I know you aren't going to dump the clutch from a dead stop at least I wouldn't. Just curious if you have any traction issues at lower speeds?
You are correct a rear engined tt has weigh better traction then the front engine Viper. Question for you with your car at 1.5 bars from a dead stop can you get traction or do you have to ease on the throttle? I know you aren't going to dump the clutch from a dead stop at least I wouldn't. Just curious if you have any traction issues at lower speeds?
#15
Originally Posted by dgussin1
u think the viper would hook up at 60mph?