How much HP can headers REALLY provide?
#1
How much HP can headers REALLY provide?
EVOM?
Billy Boat?
Agency Power?
Fab Speed?
X51 headers?
I find NO evidence that headers by themselves add any HP!!
If you guys have some independent DYNO tests that would be helpful.
Test
- Stock exhaust - ____ HP
- Stock exhaust with aftermarket headers. -_____ HP
Billy Boat?
Agency Power?
Fab Speed?
X51 headers?
I find NO evidence that headers by themselves add any HP!!
If you guys have some independent DYNO tests that would be helpful.
Test
- Stock exhaust - ____ HP
- Stock exhaust with aftermarket headers. -_____ HP
#2
Well on some cars the stock manifolds are very restrictive so headers makes power gains in all RPMS....but on 996's Porsche is getting like 95% of the power of the engine, so in order to see MAYBE 15-20 hp...you need to do intake, headers, cats, mufflers, ECU. Headers by themselves may LOSE you power in the low RPM range in order to gain you a few HP in the high range.....now if you want sound, then headers, sport cats and mufflers will get you a really nice sound.....
#3
Forget about what a dyno may say or maximum power gains. Will putting a less restrictive exhaust on your car make it quicker from a stop to speeds above 100? Most likely not and it will probably be slower on a NA engine. You may get a little more power at the high rpm's, but if it takes you longer to get to that point, why bother? Without other mods, it is nothing but "bling".
#4
Actually you're partly right, the volumetric efficiency (ve) of the m96 is about 83% per unit fuel used. A chevrolet v8 stock is around 60% ve, so adding headers to the SBC will add huge power gains, while the m96 already has headers stock and merely switching to a slightly better designed unit may add 3-5 hp on a good day. When the SBC engine is tuned to the same 83% ve, you're pushing 575 hp. In short, the H6 m96 porsche engine is already operating close to 90%, those last 10% ve numbers are the hardest to maximize. It's all about ve in racing engines, esp NA varients. Forced induction, via boost, can actually push beyond 100%ve.
Check out "The Chevrolet Racing Engine" by Bill 'Grump' Jenkins, it explains all the principals of building NA racing engines pushing 100% ve, a bit dated, but an excellent read.
Check out "The Chevrolet Racing Engine" by Bill 'Grump' Jenkins, it explains all the principals of building NA racing engines pushing 100% ve, a bit dated, but an excellent read.
#5
Fascinating Explanation....
Actually you're partly right, the volumetric efficiency (ve) of the m96 is about 83% per unit fuel used. A chevrolet v8 stock is around 60% ve, so adding headers to the SBC will add huge power gains, while the m96 already has headers stock and merely switching to a slightly better designed unit may add 3-5 hp on a good day. When the SBC engine is tuned to the same 83% ve, you're pushing 575 hp. In short, the H6 m96 porsche engine is already operating close to 90%, those last 10% ve numbers are the hardest to maximize. It's all about ve in racing engines, esp NA varients. Forced induction, via boost, can actually push beyond 100%ve.
Check out "The Chevrolet Racing Engine" by Bill 'Grump' Jenkins, it explains all the principals of building NA racing engines pushing 100% ve, a bit dated, but an excellent read.
Check out "The Chevrolet Racing Engine" by Bill 'Grump' Jenkins, it explains all the principals of building NA racing engines pushing 100% ve, a bit dated, but an excellent read.
#6
I second TTsurgeons comments. Having driven Vettes for almost 20 years before my 2002 c2 I bought in June, I got Huge gains from headers on carburated smallblocks. Simply viewing the stock cast irons on a smallblock versus any good header system will demonstrate this. When I first had my c2 on the lift I realized I already had headers, the stock ones!! I do think 100 cell cats on a stock header setup would increase horsepower, but only about 10 HP more would be my quess.
#7
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oddjob142
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
0
08-19-2015 01:27 PM