996- best year / worst year?
#16
LOL, never really thought about it like that from that perspective.
#17
Clearly, everyone has their opinions....some are based on evidence, some on ego & substance abuse.
1. If you like to work on your car and can take the engine apart & put it back together, then a Mk I 996 is an excellent value ('99-01). They run well. Many have never had any significant problems. But they do have a higher incidence of engine issues...many of which are not that expensive to fix, especially if you can do the work yourself.
2. If you're not so mechanically inclined, then a Mk II series is probably better. '02 - '04 may be a sweet spot in that the IMS bearing is easily replaceable. Personally, I prefer '03-'04. '02 might have an advantage if you like to change your stereo as I think it's the last year with standard copper connections in the stereo system (pre MOST).
3. I don't know that we have any reason to believe that the M97 won't have IMS issues over time. '05 is the first year with an IMS bearing that is sealed and can't be replaced without opening the engine. So, personally, I'd skip '05-'08....and jump back in with '09 that doesn't have an IMS at all. Given that '09 was the first year of the new engine, there's even some argument to wait for a '10.
1. If you like to work on your car and can take the engine apart & put it back together, then a Mk I 996 is an excellent value ('99-01). They run well. Many have never had any significant problems. But they do have a higher incidence of engine issues...many of which are not that expensive to fix, especially if you can do the work yourself.
2. If you're not so mechanically inclined, then a Mk II series is probably better. '02 - '04 may be a sweet spot in that the IMS bearing is easily replaceable. Personally, I prefer '03-'04. '02 might have an advantage if you like to change your stereo as I think it's the last year with standard copper connections in the stereo system (pre MOST).
3. I don't know that we have any reason to believe that the M97 won't have IMS issues over time. '05 is the first year with an IMS bearing that is sealed and can't be replaced without opening the engine. So, personally, I'd skip '05-'08....and jump back in with '09 that doesn't have an IMS at all. Given that '09 was the first year of the new engine, there's even some argument to wait for a '10.
#18
Clearly, everyone has their opinions....some are based on evidence, some on ego & substance abuse.
1. If you like to work on your car and can take the engine apart & put it back together, then a Mk I 996 is an excellent value ('99-01). They run well. Many have never had any significant problems. But they do have a higher incidence of engine issues...many of which are not that expensive to fix, especially if you can do the work yourself.
2. If you're not so mechanically inclined, then a Mk II series is probably better. '02 - '04 may be a sweet spot in that the IMS bearing is easily replaceable. Personally, I prefer '03-'04. '02 might have an advantage if you like to change your stereo as I think it's the last year with standard copper connections in the stereo system (pre MOST).
3. I don't know that we have any reason to believe that the M97 won't have IMS issues over time. '05 is the first year with an IMS bearing that is sealed and can't be replaced without opening the engine. So, personally, I'd skip '05-'08....and jump back in with '09 that doesn't have an IMS at all. Given that '09 was the first year of the new engine, there's even some argument to wait for a '10.
1. If you like to work on your car and can take the engine apart & put it back together, then a Mk I 996 is an excellent value ('99-01). They run well. Many have never had any significant problems. But they do have a higher incidence of engine issues...many of which are not that expensive to fix, especially if you can do the work yourself.
2. If you're not so mechanically inclined, then a Mk II series is probably better. '02 - '04 may be a sweet spot in that the IMS bearing is easily replaceable. Personally, I prefer '03-'04. '02 might have an advantage if you like to change your stereo as I think it's the last year with standard copper connections in the stereo system (pre MOST).
3. I don't know that we have any reason to believe that the M97 won't have IMS issues over time. '05 is the first year with an IMS bearing that is sealed and can't be replaced without opening the engine. So, personally, I'd skip '05-'08....and jump back in with '09 that doesn't have an IMS at all. Given that '09 was the first year of the new engine, there's even some argument to wait for a '10.
#20
Clearly, everyone has their opinions....some are based on evidence, some on ego & substance abuse.
1. If you like to work on your car and can take the engine apart & put it back together, then a Mk I 996 is an excellent value ('99-01). They run well. Many have never had any significant problems. But they do have a higher incidence of engine issues...many of which are not that expensive to fix, especially if you can do the work yourself.
2. If you're not so mechanically inclined, then a Mk II series is probably better. '02 - '04 may be a sweet spot in that the IMS bearing is easily replaceable. Personally, I prefer '03-'04. '02 might have an advantage if you like to change your stereo as I think it's the last year with standard copper connections in the stereo system (pre MOST).
3. I don't know that we have any reason to believe that the M97 won't have IMS issues over time. '05 is the first year with an IMS bearing that is sealed and can't be replaced without opening the engine. So, personally, I'd skip '05-'08....and jump back in with '09 that doesn't have an IMS at all. Given that '09 was the first year of the new engine, there's even some argument to wait for a '10.
1. If you like to work on your car and can take the engine apart & put it back together, then a Mk I 996 is an excellent value ('99-01). They run well. Many have never had any significant problems. But they do have a higher incidence of engine issues...many of which are not that expensive to fix, especially if you can do the work yourself.
2. If you're not so mechanically inclined, then a Mk II series is probably better. '02 - '04 may be a sweet spot in that the IMS bearing is easily replaceable. Personally, I prefer '03-'04. '02 might have an advantage if you like to change your stereo as I think it's the last year with standard copper connections in the stereo system (pre MOST).
3. I don't know that we have any reason to believe that the M97 won't have IMS issues over time. '05 is the first year with an IMS bearing that is sealed and can't be replaced without opening the engine. So, personally, I'd skip '05-'08....and jump back in with '09 that doesn't have an IMS at all. Given that '09 was the first year of the new engine, there's even some argument to wait for a '10.
If you are considering a MY99-MY01 996 make sure to check the engine code. Porsche replaced a number of these m96 motors in the 2005 timeframe and those "reman" engines have the larger IMSB which precludes the LN Eng upgrade unless R&R and tead down is in the cards already. If you see the letters "AT" in the engine code that is a reman motor.
#22
I think the real question is at what point does a modified anything become something else?
I'd say it improved her performance significantly though
Mute point now, as the mileage is too high and the rough ride is showing
Everything is relative.
#24
From what I read I wouldn't think the average 996 buyer is equipped to do their own oil change let alone IMS bearing upgrade--whether single row or double row . If you are one of the brave souls who have done the LN Eng upgrade yourself I'd certainly like to hear about your experience.
If you are considering a MY99-MY01 996 make sure to check the engine code. Porsche replaced a number of these m96 motors in the 2005 timeframe and those "reman" engines have the larger IMSB which precludes the LN Eng upgrade unless R&R and tead down is in the cards already. If you see the letters "AT" in the engine code that is a reman motor.
If you are considering a MY99-MY01 996 make sure to check the engine code. Porsche replaced a number of these m96 motors in the 2005 timeframe and those "reman" engines have the larger IMSB which precludes the LN Eng upgrade unless R&R and tead down is in the cards already. If you see the letters "AT" in the engine code that is a reman motor.
Thanks
#25
Go to Rennlist and read some posts (but most of us internet guys aren't average of course). Many folks do a lot of their own work. Most everything is simple except when the tranny has to come out.
#27
...j
#28
From what I read I wouldn't think the average 996 buyer is equipped to do their own oil change let alone IMS bearing upgrade--whether single row or double row . If you are one of the brave souls who have done the LN Eng upgrade yourself I'd certainly like to hear about your experience.
If you are considering a MY99-MY01 996 make sure to check the engine code. Porsche replaced a number of these m96 motors in the 2005 timeframe and those "reman" engines have the larger IMSB which precludes the LN Eng upgrade unless R&R and tead down is in the cards already. If you see the letters "AT" in the engine code that is a reman motor.
If you are considering a MY99-MY01 996 make sure to check the engine code. Porsche replaced a number of these m96 motors in the 2005 timeframe and those "reman" engines have the larger IMSB which precludes the LN Eng upgrade unless R&R and tead down is in the cards already. If you see the letters "AT" in the engine code that is a reman motor.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrNurse
Boxster / Cayman
8
09-10-2015 09:44 AM