996 Previous model naturally aspirated Porsche 911 community. Discuss C2, C2s, C4, C4s, Targa and Cabriolets.

285 vs. 265 Which would you choose and Why?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-10-2005 | 01:00 PM
drpaulmarsh's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
San Diego Porschophile
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 299
From: San Diego, CA
Rep Power: 32
drpaulmarsh is infamous around these parts
Lightbulb 285 vs. 265 Which would you choose and Why?

I will be installing the ROW M030 supsension on my 99- C2 coupe mostlikely next weekend.

I plan on getting new tires and a alignment too, but can't decide which size I should run on the back... (I have 18" stock rims)

1. Which would you choose and why?
2. Do you have any suggestions on alignment specs as well?

Paul
 
  #2  
Old 07-10-2005 | 01:27 PM
2thfixr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,078
From: BFE
Rep Power: 190
2thfixr is a splendid one to behold2thfixr is a splendid one to behold2thfixr is a splendid one to behold2thfixr is a splendid one to behold2thfixr is a splendid one to behold2thfixr is a splendid one to behold2thfixr is a splendid one to behold
Re: 285 vs. 265 Which would you choose and Why?

Originally posted by drpaulmarsh
I will be installing the ROW M030 supsension on my 99- C2 coupe mostlikely next weekend.

I plan on getting new tires and a alignment too, but can't decide which size I should run on the back... (I have 18" stock rims)

1. Which would you choose and why?
2. Do you have any suggestions on alignment specs as well?

Paul
Mine came with 265s and I replaced them with 265s twice. The 3rd time I went with 285s and I will never get 265s again. The 285s look nicer on the rim and instead of being too narrow for the rim they look just right. If you ever look at the front and rear tires on your car you will know what I mean. The 265s look like they are too narrow and appear stretched onto the rim. The 285s fit right and also allow the rim protector bead to actually protect the rim.

There is a slight problem though. The issue is with the front wheels. If your car came with 265s then you are supposed to only replace them with 265s. Not because of the rear rim but because your front tires and rims are matched to the 265 rears. Installing 285s will upset the handling characteristics of the car. In order to upgrade to the 285s properly, you are supposed to change the front rims to a 1/2 inch wider version. I didn't bother because I don't track my car. Just be aware that there is more to it than just changing to the wider rear tire.
 
  #3  
Old 07-10-2005 | 03:06 PM
Marc's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,005
From: Miami
Rep Power: 225
Marc is just really niceMarc is just really niceMarc is just really niceMarc is just really niceMarc is just really nice
I went to a 285 after my first set wore out on my 2000, it would be good to upgrade the front wheels to 8" as they are only 7.5" for 1999-2000..this way even though you will be wearing the same tire size in the front you will expose more tread to the road on a wider rim and even out the f/r size difference to avoid understeer issues...
 
  #4  
Old 07-10-2005 | 07:48 PM
drpaulmarsh's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
San Diego Porschophile
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 299
From: San Diego, CA
Rep Power: 32
drpaulmarsh is infamous around these parts
Hmmmmm,
Is there a way to measure my front rims with out taking them off?
 
  #5  
Old 07-10-2005 | 11:24 PM
TT Surgeon's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
From: Long Island, NY
Rep Power: 345
TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !
The size is stamped on the outside '8J' means 8 ", when I put my snows on 265 rear down from 295, my cars handling is off the wall, the awd is constantly correcting itself front to rear, it's a weird feeling.
 
  #6  
Old 07-11-2005 | 09:46 AM
Kevin H. in Atl's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 15
From: Atlanta, GA
Rep Power: 0
Kevin H. in Atl is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by drpaulmarsh
Hmmmmm,
Is there a way to measure my front rims with out taking them off?
Paul,
If you have stock wheels, the fronts are 7.5", rears 10". The sizes are listed in your owners manual.
I have standard Turbo Looks on my car and the wheel size and offsets are not stamped in a visible area (as they are on many Porsche wheels). I measured my wheels with a carpenter's tape to confirm that I have 7.5's in the front. I kept 265's on my rears. 285's cost about $30 more per tire also (for Pilot Sports). I suppose 285's coupled with the 7.5's on front might increase understeer slightly, but you could probably compensate by reducing rear tire pressures. I am currently running 36f/40r anyway to help with understeer until I get the Row installed. Then, of course, will have to re-evaluate front/rear pressure stagger.

Have you recieved any shipping info on our group buy Row 030 from Rick @ Suncoast?
 
  #7  
Old 07-11-2005 | 10:57 AM
drpaulmarsh's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
San Diego Porschophile
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 299
From: San Diego, CA
Rep Power: 32
drpaulmarsh is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by Kevin H. in Atl
Paul,
If you have stock wheels, the fronts are 7.5", rears 10". The sizes are listed in your owners manual.
I have standard Turbo Looks on my car and the wheel size and offsets are not stamped in a visible area (as they are on many Porsche wheels). I measured my wheels with a carpenter's tape to confirm that I have 7.5's in the front. I kept 265's on my rears. 285's cost about $30 more per tire also (for Pilot Sports). I suppose 285's coupled with the 7.5's on front might increase understeer slightly, but you could probably compensate by reducing rear tire pressures. I am currently running 36f/40r anyway to help with understeer until I get the Row installed. Then, of course, will have to re-evaluate front/rear pressure stagger.

Have you recieved any shipping info on our group buy Row 030 from Rick @ Suncoast?


Rick only charrged me $47.33 to ship to San Diego, California.
 
  #8  
Old 07-11-2005 | 12:06 PM
Bruinbro's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,861
From: Woodland Hills
Rep Power: 96
Bruinbro is a jewel in the roughBruinbro is a jewel in the roughBruinbro is a jewel in the rough
Go with the 285. If understeer is a problem, either change out the fronts to 8 or 8.5 inch rims and put 245-35's on them or get a larger sway bar. I can't imagine increased understeer being a problem with a rear-engined car; the Boxsters are more sensitve to understeer-oversteer changes.

FYI, here's a pic of mine with 285-30 in the rear and 245-35 in the front. The Dunlops run very wide, so the the 285's measure out to a 295 tire section width and the fronts measure out to a 255 section width.



Bruinbro
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Studio RSR
Other Japanese Supercars
4
11-10-2015 07:45 PM
ECS Tuning - BMW
Mini Cooper Vendor Classifieds
0
09-16-2015 07:20 AM
TurboDragon
Automobiles For Sale
1
09-04-2015 09:11 PM
falter
964 Turbo
0
09-04-2015 01:41 PM
falter
964 Turbo
0
09-04-2015 01:37 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 285 vs. 265 Which would you choose and Why?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:34 AM.