EVO Supercharger Owners' Thread
#196
low cell cats
hey the new low cell cats are not supposed to trip CEL light. the seccond o2 sensor should be further down the line for a better reading. i have fab speed cats on my car and no CEL light yet. i hope that it stays tha way.
if the engine is like a air pump. air in air out. you would think that the better flowing step up with low cell cats would be better for the car's preforamnce
if the engine is like a air pump. air in air out. you would think that the better flowing step up with low cell cats would be better for the car's preforamnce
#197
I was just looking on EVO's site. Maybe my boost readings aren't that far off. For some reason I assumed the 3.6 was operating at 6 psi. They list the 3.6 as operating at 0.35 bar (5psi).
The 3.4 is listed at operating at .4 bar (6psi).
My installer has seen a top reading of around 4.5 psi, but that was only driving around town. He hasn't done a fourth or fifth gear run, putting the engine under a full load yet.
The 3.4 is listed at operating at .4 bar (6psi).
My installer has seen a top reading of around 4.5 psi, but that was only driving around town. He hasn't done a fourth or fifth gear run, putting the engine under a full load yet.
Last edited by deputydog95; 12-07-2005 at 09:45 AM.
#198
I'm being quoted $9400 for the EVO and $2k for the install (plus tax). Does this sound about right? Anyone have experience with Autodynamica in Houston, Tx? ..they were listed as an authorized installer on EVO's website.
#199
that sounds about right. the kit price is a little low and the labor is a little high. together it seems like a good deal. check and see if they have done one before. did they lower the kit price to compensate for the sales tax difference if you ordered the kit directly from EVO? i think the labor time is around 10-12 hours for the kit, plus extras like coolant, new spark plugs, a new MAF (in my case). see what they're including for that price.
check out EVO's site. i don't remember what the 3.4 kit sale price was (i thought you had a 3.4), but they are running some really good prices on these kits for this december sale.
is this the same miykl from the zx10 board?
check out EVO's site. i don't remember what the 3.4 kit sale price was (i thought you had a 3.4), but they are running some really good prices on these kits for this december sale.
is this the same miykl from the zx10 board?
#200
9399 is the sale price for the 3.4 kit
Originally posted by deputydog95
that sounds about right. the kit price is a little low and the labor is a little high. together it seems like a good deal. check and see if they have done one before. did they lower the kit price to compensate for the sales tax difference if you ordered the kit directly from EVO? i think the labor time is around 10-12 hours for the kit, plus extras like coolant, new spark plugs, a new MAF (in my case). see what they're including for that price.
check out EVO's site. i don't remember what the 3.4 kit sale price was (i thought you had a 3.4), but they are running some really good prices on these kits for this december sale.
is this the same miykl from the zx10 board?
that sounds about right. the kit price is a little low and the labor is a little high. together it seems like a good deal. check and see if they have done one before. did they lower the kit price to compensate for the sales tax difference if you ordered the kit directly from EVO? i think the labor time is around 10-12 hours for the kit, plus extras like coolant, new spark plugs, a new MAF (in my case). see what they're including for that price.
check out EVO's site. i don't remember what the 3.4 kit sale price was (i thought you had a 3.4), but they are running some really good prices on these kits for this december sale.
is this the same miykl from the zx10 board?
#202
[QUOTE]Originally posted by deputydog95
that sounds about right. the kit price is a little low and the labor is a little high. together it seems like a good deal. check and see if they have done one before. did they lower the kit price to compensate for the sales tax difference if you ordered the kit directly from EVO? i think the labor time is around 10-12 hours for the kit, plus extras like coolant, new spark plugs, a new MAF (in my case). see what they're including for that price.
check out EVO's site. i don't remember what the 3.4 kit sale price was (i thought you had a 3.4), but they are running some really good prices on these kits for this december sale.
is this the same miykl from the zx10 [QUOTE]
Thanks, I'll ask those questions. I did ask for references from previous costumers. The reply (email) was that the Houston shop is new, but they have done the installs in Mexico and S.America for two years. He refered me to Todd for his references.
Yes, same Miykl of ZX10R.net "fame".
I was looking for a used kit to install under the 'ol shade tree. I'd still rather do it myself just to learn the car's workings better. I would not want to lose any warrantee that a new system would come with by not using an authorized installer though.
that sounds about right. the kit price is a little low and the labor is a little high. together it seems like a good deal. check and see if they have done one before. did they lower the kit price to compensate for the sales tax difference if you ordered the kit directly from EVO? i think the labor time is around 10-12 hours for the kit, plus extras like coolant, new spark plugs, a new MAF (in my case). see what they're including for that price.
check out EVO's site. i don't remember what the 3.4 kit sale price was (i thought you had a 3.4), but they are running some really good prices on these kits for this december sale.
is this the same miykl from the zx10 [QUOTE]
Originally posted by deputydog95
i would order the kit directly from evo then and let your local guy install it. sales tax on 9K is a lot of money. [/QUOTEoard? [/B]
i would order the kit directly from evo then and let your local guy install it. sales tax on 9K is a lot of money. [/QUOTEoard? [/B]
Yes, same Miykl of ZX10R.net "fame".
I was looking for a used kit to install under the 'ol shade tree. I'd still rather do it myself just to learn the car's workings better. I would not want to lose any warrantee that a new system would come with by not using an authorized installer though.
Last edited by Miykl; 12-07-2005 at 12:56 PM.
#203
Originally posted by deputydog95
RWdrift: Did you do dyno runs on your car before and after the SC? You have the 3.4 liter right? Evo's site only shows 352 rwhp for your model? Your almost 40rwhp over that. Did you have a really strong 3.4 liter to begin with, or are you doing something different. Not to mention Evo's listed dyno numbers are way high as they used a mustang dyno (at least fo the 3.6 runs). You made almost the same rwhp as me (402ish) and I have a 3.6 with CG export mufflers (for whatever their worth).
RWdrift: Did you do dyno runs on your car before and after the SC? You have the 3.4 liter right? Evo's site only shows 352 rwhp for your model? Your almost 40rwhp over that. Did you have a really strong 3.4 liter to begin with, or are you doing something different. Not to mention Evo's listed dyno numbers are way high as they used a mustang dyno (at least fo the 3.6 runs). You made almost the same rwhp as me (402ish) and I have a 3.6 with CG export mufflers (for whatever their worth).
#204
Dog: You might want to find another way of measuring your performance increase than dyno numbers. They really don't mean much anyway. You will find guys claiming some ungodly numbers and yet they can't get their cars to perform on the street. Measure your performance based on the kind of driving you do. Pick a safe stretch of road that you can regularly measure performance times and go there whenever you make a performance mod. For instance, if you like the short sprints in your 996, start measuring the time it takes to get from a dead stop to 100 mph. Your stock engine most probably took about 11.5 seconds to get there. See what it does now. Get it down to the 9's and then you are moving. Or 0 - 150 or whatever you want to measure. Or from some rolling start speed.
This is a the only way to see if the improvements you make are working or not. It is not measured in an artificial enviornment and takes all variables into consideration. You learn to know what perfromance differences there are with temperature changes, etc.
Saying your car has X HP will not, in anyway, tell you how it will perform, but if you measure the actual performance, you will know what your car CAN do and not what it SHOULD do. It will also alert you to any problems you might have with the engine or blower as time goes by. JMO.
You'll notice that most people love to boast about how much HP they have, yet will not tell you their performance figures. Is that because they don't know? Or is it that their perfromance number simply aren't reflective of the power they claim to have?
This is a the only way to see if the improvements you make are working or not. It is not measured in an artificial enviornment and takes all variables into consideration. You learn to know what perfromance differences there are with temperature changes, etc.
Saying your car has X HP will not, in anyway, tell you how it will perform, but if you measure the actual performance, you will know what your car CAN do and not what it SHOULD do. It will also alert you to any problems you might have with the engine or blower as time goes by. JMO.
You'll notice that most people love to boast about how much HP they have, yet will not tell you their performance figures. Is that because they don't know? Or is it that their perfromance number simply aren't reflective of the power they claim to have?
Last edited by 1999Porsche911; 12-07-2005 at 05:33 PM.
#205
911: I am more of a tangible person, i like to see differences on paper (even if dyno numbers aren't accurate or reliable) than a sense or feeling for improvements in the car. Inaccuracies in human timing and sensation on a road just don't do it for me. I want to rule out any type of placebo or imaginary improvement that in my mind may tell me to the different mods on my car. Yes, although the dyno is a artifical enviornment, the conditions are somewhat controlled, measured and reproducable. (scientists have an artificial laboratory to control the enviornment during an experiment) I'll try to get dyno numbers after the sc and then after the headers and muffler install.
#206
Originally posted by jungzilla
911: I am more of a tangible person, i like to see differences on paper (even if dyno numbers aren't accurate or reliable) than a sense or feeling for improvements in the car. Inaccuracies in human timing and sensation on a road just don't do it for me. I want to rule out any type of placebo or imaginary improvement that in my mind may tell me to the different mods on my car. Yes, although the dyno is a artifical enviornment, the conditions are somewhat controlled, measured and reproducable. (scientists have an artificial laboratory to control the enviornment during an experiment) I'll try to get dyno numbers after the sc and then after the headers and muffler install.
911: I am more of a tangible person, i like to see differences on paper (even if dyno numbers aren't accurate or reliable) than a sense or feeling for improvements in the car. Inaccuracies in human timing and sensation on a road just don't do it for me. I want to rule out any type of placebo or imaginary improvement that in my mind may tell me to the different mods on my car. Yes, although the dyno is a artifical enviornment, the conditions are somewhat controlled, measured and reproducable. (scientists have an artificial laboratory to control the enviornment during an experiment) I'll try to get dyno numbers after the sc and then after the headers and muffler install.
And you are correct about the science lab...and I am sure you are aware of the numerous lab experiments that do not work outside the lab. Your car does not live in a vacuum. But, different beliefs is what makes the world go around.
Last edited by 1999Porsche911; 12-07-2005 at 08:42 PM.
#207
Originally posted by deputydog95
so there's only three of us on here with evo sc kits???
so there's only three of us on here with evo sc kits???
a few things:
4500 to redline at WOT, amazing! kind scary. i don't know how the TT folk can handle their huge HP but i think i will soon get used to it
it's a little louder at idle than i expected. it's alright as it drowns out the lightweight flywheel rattle :O. i love the whine when i finally get on the throttle.
it's not fun in bumper to bumper traffic. i think the parasitic drag paired with my LWF bog the engine down. when i am at a crawl in 1st and i tap the gas a little the whole car bucks and i thought was gonna stall. maybe it's a software glitch. i solved it by just crawling around in second .
#209
congrats carlos. enjoy. something doesn't sound right with your setup. my car drives like stock at low rpms. maybe it's your LWF.
the gtech is fine and all, but it won't tell you your AF ratio at wide open throttle though
the gtech is fine and all, but it won't tell you your AF ratio at wide open throttle though
#210
Originally posted by deputydog95
congrats carlos. enjoy. something doesn't sound right with your setup. my car drives like stock at low rpms. maybe it's your LWF.
the gtech is fine and all, but it won't tell you your AF ratio at wide open throttle though
congrats carlos. enjoy. something doesn't sound right with your setup. my car drives like stock at low rpms. maybe it's your LWF.
the gtech is fine and all, but it won't tell you your AF ratio at wide open throttle though
A good scanner will tell you everything, including what the AFR is doing at all speeds.