EVO Supercharger Owners' Thread
#31
Deputy
Sorry my engine and tranny is still looking for the slightly damaged body (roller) for testing so the only ones enjoying it are the pigeons, I am building the whole enchillada piece buy piece. I was lucky enough to spend a some years in the turbine/compressor area as a test tech and what I found out is all compressors all do the same thing Suck and Blow air I think by re-pulling the SC will just raise the pressure which I think 6psi is safe and dependable, but the question is to me where in the RPM band do you want the power. If you move to a S trim charger it will be slower to spin up but it will also give you the power down lower in the RPM band and still maintain the 6psi target point. I am piecing a website together of some of the stuff I have done more incomplete then complete but your welcome to look at pictures for fun. Sorry could not help with real test statistics.
http://www.webbspot.com/porsche/index.html
http://www.webbspot.com/porsche/index.html
#32
Dyno tests
Deputy I am curious of one thing during your up comming dyno testing is how do they check for pressure manifold leaks. Is it computer readouts for pressure loss or soap in a spray bottle? I would be interested to know. Hope all goes well.
#33
Interesting
Originally posted by Captain Tal
Deputy,
I did experience a small challenge while at the track one day. My local track has several sustained (hi G) left hand turns which caused the oil to collect on the right side of the supercharger instead of flowing normally through the drain at the bottom. The oil overflowed and caused me to stop driving until I could get it diagnosed. After I had it cleaned out, I have experienced no problems. I consider this to be a minor problem for which Todd has offered a solution.
Tom
Deputy,
I did experience a small challenge while at the track one day. My local track has several sustained (hi G) left hand turns which caused the oil to collect on the right side of the supercharger instead of flowing normally through the drain at the bottom. The oil overflowed and caused me to stop driving until I could get it diagnosed. After I had it cleaned out, I have experienced no problems. I consider this to be a minor problem for which Todd has offered a solution.
Tom
#35
Originally posted by RobynC
I had no issues when I tracked my car with the SC.
oil feed lines suck... if not for that clamp...I'd still be driving my car
I had no issues when I tracked my car with the SC.
oil feed lines suck... if not for that clamp...I'd still be driving my car
#39
Cool website mother. How are you going to get that motor back into the doner car with all the extra stuff installed?
Dyno appt is at 11am tomorrow. Not sure how we'll check for boost leaks. I guess if it puts up some good numbers then i won't worry about it. Soapy water is a good idea though. It'd be really hard to check all the hoses though as some are completely out or reach and almost out of view.
Mother, what are you going to do to control the ecu?
Dyno appt is at 11am tomorrow. Not sure how we'll check for boost leaks. I guess if it puts up some good numbers then i won't worry about it. Soapy water is a good idea though. It'd be really hard to check all the hoses though as some are completely out or reach and almost out of view.
Mother, what are you going to do to control the ecu?
#40
This is a project I've been thinking about. Lease is up on my Turbo next April and I really miss my '00 996. Thought about finding a good one and installing the SC. I apologize in advance if this question has already been addressed, but what about the high compresion ratio of the 996 engine? I know that all forced induction engines have a lower comp ratio than N/As. Is it necessary that the CR be dropped or is the original CR within the safety limits of the engine?
#42
Deputy
Originally posted by deputydog95
Cool website mother. How are you going to get that motor back into the doner car with all the extra stuff installed?
Dyno appt is at 11am tomorrow. Not sure how we'll check for boost leaks. I guess if it puts up some good numbers then i won't worry about it. Soapy water is a good idea though. It'd be really hard to check all the hoses though as some are completely out or reach and almost out of view.
Mother, what are you going to do to control the ecu?
Cool website mother. How are you going to get that motor back into the doner car with all the extra stuff installed?
Dyno appt is at 11am tomorrow. Not sure how we'll check for boost leaks. I guess if it puts up some good numbers then i won't worry about it. Soapy water is a good idea though. It'd be really hard to check all the hoses though as some are completely out or reach and almost out of view.
Mother, what are you going to do to control the ecu?
#43
Hot off the presses. Here's the "after" dyno run. I need to get all my dyno runs emailed to me at some point, and for some reason they did not overlay my best "stock" run. It was close, so it's good enough for this comparison.
Not too shabby though. Over 400 uncorrected HP to the wheels. It was actually considerably lower with the corrected numbers so we went with the uncorrected. Nice and cool out today (low 80's)with low humidity.
The only issue, and there may not really be one, is the air fuel ratio. The stock run was spot on to what stock should have been, but this "after run" shows a lean condition. Their AF meter may be out of calibration though.
I am considering adding a boost/AF guage. Any recommendations?
Not too shabby though. Over 400 uncorrected HP to the wheels. It was actually considerably lower with the corrected numbers so we went with the uncorrected. Nice and cool out today (low 80's)with low humidity.
The only issue, and there may not really be one, is the air fuel ratio. The stock run was spot on to what stock should have been, but this "after run" shows a lean condition. Their AF meter may be out of calibration though.
I am considering adding a boost/AF guage. Any recommendations?