997 TT stock DYNO numbers...
#31
400 + to the wheels (AWD) on a Mustang dyno is for sure on par with the SAE'ed 480 at the crank.
Pending cars and or drivetrain loss... difference between a Mustang dyno and DynoJet can be 7% to 10%. <O</ODynoJet has load but this can be viewed as the car doing what it does at the wheels through no street load. <O</OMustang Dyno more or less shows the same car under load actually sitting on the street.
<O</OI say the above because they used a hub dyno to see 475 to the wheels in the GT-R which can’t be 20 more HP than what you guys with 997s would see.
<O</OCheers,<O</O
Allen
Pending cars and or drivetrain loss... difference between a Mustang dyno and DynoJet can be 7% to 10%. <O</ODynoJet has load but this can be viewed as the car doing what it does at the wheels through no street load. <O</OMustang Dyno more or less shows the same car under load actually sitting on the street.
<O</OI say the above because they used a hub dyno to see 475 to the wheels in the GT-R which can’t be 20 more HP than what you guys with 997s would see.
<O</OCheers,<O</O
Allen
#33
The Vivid racing example is just what I would have expected and makes that a very strong car indeed.
430hp and 415tq is right where you should be with those mods. Very nice!
No ECU upgrade on that car?
I thought I read in Excellence that GMG felt 550hp to the flywheel was about all you could get out of the 997TT with stock turbos. Am I wrong about that?
430hp and 415tq is right where you should be with those mods. Very nice!
No ECU upgrade on that car?
I thought I read in Excellence that GMG felt 550hp to the flywheel was about all you could get out of the 997TT with stock turbos. Am I wrong about that?
Last edited by Barrister; 06-12-2008 at 12:06 PM.
#35
I guess we should just be pleased if the car drives like we expect and not get hung up on the numbers.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mackchacha
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
3
07-09-2019 11:03 AM
vividracing
Mercedes / AMG
1
09-01-2015 03:16 PM